Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.56
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I cannot create ubuntu chroot at all with debootstrap.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
$ sudo debootstrap --arch=amd64 precise precise-am
On 28/01/14 21:02, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Note that with this patch, it still fails the testsuite as I think
> debian/testsuite-kfreebsd.diff needs to be refreshed.
Attached is a refreshed debian/testsuite-kfreebsd.diff
The patch hunks for 'du' had been merged in upstream.
Thanks,
Regards,
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
busybox FTBFS trying to set up a signal handler for SIGPWR, which is
not used or defined on kfreebsd-* or hurd-i386. The attached patch
would skip setting up this particula
On 01/28/2014 09:10 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Helge Deller, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 21:06:12 +0100, a écrit :
>> That said: Is it technically possible to just activate the
>> generation of "installation-guide-hppa" (and maybe for other arches
>> which won't be in Jessie?) when building for "unstable"
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #736966 [debian-installer] debian-installer: patch for new hppa kernel
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Control: tag -1 pending
Helge Deller (2014-01-28):
> Version: git
(I removed that using notfound in an earlier mail.)
> It would be nice if someone with enough karma would apply it to the
> git tree.
Pushed, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Helge Deller, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 21:06:12 +0100, a écrit :
> That said: Is it technically possible to just activate the generation of
> "installation-guide-hppa" (and maybe for other arches which won't be in
> Jessie?) when building for "unstable" ? I mean, as soon as a new
> installation-guide
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 736966 git
Bug #736966 [debian-installer] debian-installer: patch for new hppa kernel
There is no source info for the package 'debian-installer' at version 'git'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version 'git'
No l
Hi Samuel,
On 01/26/2014 10:58 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Helge Deller, le Sun 26 Jan 2014 21:21:49 +0100, a écrit :
>> Next step for me was to try to create a installation-cd.
>> For that I used debian-cd, but failed because the package
>> "installation-guide-hppa" is missing in the
>> reposit
Package: debian-installer
Version: git
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
With the attached trivial patch I was able to build the debian-installer for
the hppa architecture
(and afterwards a netboot install image :-)).
It would be nice if someone with enough karma would apply it to the git tree.
Thank
Package: installation-reports
Preparing to install Debian on my new T430, which has an e1000e on eth0
and an Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 (supported with iwlwifi and
non-free firmware) as wlan0.
I formatted a USB stick, copied the contents of boot.img.gz,[1] copied
the netinst ISO,[2] and untar
I've just tried to re-install Debian on a NUC and encountered the same
problem.
IIRC, when I first installed it I used an image on CD and had no issues
- the installation went smoothly and everything worked.
I recently decided to upgrade the NUC to a 480G SSD, and went for a
fresh installati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.49
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 16:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Gaudenz Steinlin (2014-01-27):
> > In addition it would be nice to have this on a branch in the official
> > Alioth repository.
>
> Why not. Please note there are some pending patches for SHA* sums, and
> some more should appear shortly
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:27:50 +0400
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:1.22.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#736872: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #736872,
regarding busybox: zcat does not decompress file which do not have a .gz suffix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#484799: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #484799,
regarding busybox: mount -f should not mount
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
busybox_1.22.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-3.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-3.debian.tar.xz
busybox_1.22.0-3_amd64.deb
busybox-static_1.22.0-3_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.22.0-3_amd64.udeb
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-3_all.deb
udhcpc_1.22.0-3_am
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#696704: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #696704,
regarding Please enable "devmem" applet
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#375568: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #375568,
regarding busybox-static should include "Provides: busybox"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#704815: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #704815,
regarding Would it be possible to reenable CONFIG_ACPID
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:50:45 +
with message-id <1390902645.7753.14.ca...@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#736747: installation-reports: Jessie netboot amd64,
d-i fails to load installer components
has caused the Debian Bug report #736747,
regarding installation-
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 13:07 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Uncortunately, this whole mess around compression introduces another issue.
> After the 2 fixes for this bug, busybox zcat happily accepts uncompressed
> input and behaves like regular cat, while original zcat refuses to accept
> uncpmpres
28.01.2014 00:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1:1.22.0-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> The zcat applet seems to behave like cat unless the input file has a .gz
> suffix:
>
> Given two identical files (compressed string "Hello World"), one
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 736872 + confirmed upstream patch pending
Bug #736872 [busybox] busybox: zcat does not decompress file which do not have
a .gz suffix
Added tag(s) upstream, confirmed, pending, and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 23:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Alexander Pohl (2014-01-27):
> > attached are the net-retriever-* files. The packages file is empty
> > as the installer cannot find any packages! The netboot installer
> > from wheezy works, so there must be something temporarily broken
26 matches
Mail list logo
