Filed as #725643 against zfsutils-udeb; gotta love edos doing all the work…
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- Begin Message ---
Newly-broken packages in unstable
libzfs1-udeb kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
partman-zfs kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
zfsutils
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 02:20:54 +0200
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386
Version: 29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Cyril Bruleboi
partman-zfs_29_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-zfs_29.dsc
partman-zfs_29.tar.gz
partman-zfs_29_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
Cyril Brulebois (2013-08-22):
> I'm very much tempted to upload partman-zfs 25 as partman-zfs 27, and
> call it a day. Broken partitioning is a very serious issue; ditto for
> depending on something that doesn't exist.
I've just reverted the commit on top of current master. Since I wasn't
sure ho
Hi,
so fonts-lao has been in unstable for 60 days, and still hasn't entered
testing because of the out of date ttf-lao binary. It seems that nobody
is depending on it, so it could be decrufted by ftpmasters. At least
according to:
| kibi@franck:~$ dak rm -Rn -b ttf-lao -s unstable
| Will remove th
Hi,
looking at the testing summary page for d-i, I noticed win32-loader is
blocked from automatic migration. I'm not sure whether we want to keep
it that way but at least the 0.7.4.9 release currently in sid shouldn't
hurt AFAICT; some bits of "modernity" on the source side, and updated
Built-Usin
Package: zfsutils-udeb
Version: 9.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package is no longer installable, since it gained a dependency on
libjail1, which isn't an udeb. This was caught by our edos4udeb script,
but that can easily be deduced from the change
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
When installing Debian Wheezy I chose to separate my home partition from the
rest of the system, installing it all on an encrypted LVM volume. However, I
chose to let the debian installer automatically choose the sizes
(I see that Andreas has recently posted a set of patches. The patches I
have attached below are not based on that work, although they address
some of the same problems. At the end of this message, are some comments
about how our alternative solutions might be combined.)
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:02:4
Hi,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:11:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Is there still a reason to keep trying the regular mount? Are there cases
> > where grub-mount is expected to fail? Maybe only trying grub-mount could be
> > the d
10 matches
Mail list logo
