Bug#711293: debian-installer: System fails to mount root after installing btrfs on raid

2013-06-05 Thread Peter Krefting
Package: debian-installer Version: 20130430 Severity: normal Since my system (Asus eeepc 901) has fairly slow SSD disks, I tried to install on a software RAID0 chain, but that failed to boot. These are the steps I performed: 1. Set up two 4 gigabyte partitions (in my case sda2 and sdb1) for RAID.

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2013-06-05 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 04 08:07 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 04 08:08 buildd@ancina

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2013-06-05 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Loïc Minier [2013-06-05 13:40]: > Yeah, I've pushed a test_db script which currently only tests for > unknown fields (case sensitively) Can you please upload to unstable. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2013-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Loïc Minier (05/06/2013): > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any > > new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet > > seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules, causing > > non-zer

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2013-06-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any > new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet > seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules, causing > non-zero exit in case there are some hits?

busybox_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-06-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:59:36 +0800 Source: busybox Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:1.20.0-8.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer

Bug#701381: marked as done (busybox: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17)

2013-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:48:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#701381: fixed in busybox 1:1.20.0-8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #701381, regarding busybox: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2013-06-05 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2013/6/5 Cyril Brulebois : > Martin Michlmayr (04/06/2013): >> I just received several bug reports about this issue and decided to >> investigate. > Many thanks! +1 > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any > new such items would be spotted early? The follow