Bug#582101: marked as done (debian-installer: boot on raid mdadm fails after installation (raid1 + LVM) "similar superblocks)

2013-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:28:27 -0400 with message-id and subject line re: debian-installer: boot on raid mdadm fails after installation (raid1 + LVM) has caused the Debian Bug report #582101, regarding debian-installer: boot on raid mdadm fails after installation (raid1 + LVM) "si

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2013-04-26 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 26 21:37 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidamd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 26 21:38 debian-cd@pettersson Csidamd64

Bug#706112: debian-installer: Wheezy installer always install bootloader in /dev/sda

2013-04-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Vincent McIntyre (vincent.mcint...@csiro.au): > b) modify po/sublevel1/template.po to point to the new question like this: > #. Type: select > #. Choices > #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.http-in:2001 > #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.ftp.sel-in:2001 > +#: ../grub-installer.templat

Bug#702435: installation-reports: installation did not complete installing tasks or bootloader

2013-04-26 Thread Josh-Daniel Davis
Do you have any logs, screenshots, etc to explain "failed to do"? What state was the system in? Your report doesn't show partitioning information, etc. With friendly regards, Josh-D. S. Davis

Bug#706219: Subject: No boot, Sil 3114 + SATA drive on Debian installer RC1 wheezy v7.0 i386 20130214-11:13

2013-04-26 Thread techy techtech
Package: installation-reports Subject: No boot, Sil 3114 + SATA drive on Debian installer RC1 wheezy v7.0 i386 20130214-11:13 My old unresolved archived bug#607301, Dated 16.12.2010, describes this issue using Squeeze di Beta2. This new graphical install, will not Auto Re Boot using a Silicon Im

Bug#706112: debian-installer: Wheezy installer always install bootloader in /dev/sda

2013-04-26 Thread Joey Hess
Vincent McIntyre wrote: > I found the string, in po/sublevel1, here's the templates.po > #. Type: select > #. Choices > #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.http-in:2001 > #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.ftp.sel-in:2001 > msgid "enter information manually" > msgstr "" > > Is it the case that I need

Bug#706112: debian-installer: Wheezy installer always install bootloader in /dev/sda

2013-04-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, just another how-to-reproduce: run d-i on a system with /boot on RAID 1 and / on LVM on RAID 10 on five discs. d-i (priority=low) asks whether to install grub2 to the MBR, I say yes, and it installs to /dev/sda, so I’ll have to, later, in the installed system, reconfigure it to tell it to ins

Bug#706112: debian-installer: Wheezy installer always install bootloader in /dev/sda

2013-04-26 Thread Vincent McIntyre
Hi Joey thank you for your helpful comments. I'm working on fixing the issues. I do have one question because I'm completely new to the translation side of things... On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 08:28:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > There are also some hardcoded user-visible strings embedded in the

Processed: Re: Bug#706191: debian-installer: mirror/http/hostname should behave better when given http://hostname as an argument.

2013-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 706191 choose-mirror Bug #706191 [debian-installer] debian-installer: mirror/http/hostname should behave better when given http://hostname as an argument. Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'choose-mirror'. Ignoring reques

Bug#706191: debian-installer: mirror/http/hostname should behave better when given http://hostname as an argument.

2013-04-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
reassign 706191 choose-mirror severity 706191 wishlist thanks Quoting dcooley (dcoo...@mauilion.com): > Package: debian-installer > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > >* What led up to the situation? > >When installing a new system via pxe. > >* What exactly did you