Is it as simple as appending something like "desktop=xfce" to the boot
command line?
If so, maybe it could be as simple as adding a couple of sentences to
the text in /install/boot.msg ...
I'll see if that works. If it does, I'll suggest some wording for the
message.
On Feb 26, 2013,
Quoting Bob Bib (bobbib...@mail.ru):
> Michael Biebl:
>
> > Package: tasksel
> > Version: 3.14+deb7u1
> ...
> > ii tasksel-data3.14+deb7u1
>
> Where have you found tasksel/3.14+deb7u1, while testing & sid both have
> 3.14+nmu1? :)
There has been a broken upload (by me) with that ve
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #701781 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Cannot load usbcore kernel module
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #701781 to the same values
previously set
> reassign -1 flash-kernel
Bug #701781 [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Seriously WTF
> severity 656877 grave
Bug #656877 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel is not being run for kernel upgrades
with unchanged ABI version
Bug #673418 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel is not being run for kernel upgrades
with unchanged ABI versi
Michael Biebl:
> Package: tasksel
> Version: 3.14+deb7u1
...
> ii tasksel-data3.14+deb7u1
Where have you found tasksel/3.14+deb7u1, while testing & sid both have
3.14+nmu1? :)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:36:39 +0400
with message-id <1361928999.403294...@f304.mail.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#680678: task-ssh-server: depend on 'ssh' instead of
'openssh-server'
has caused the Debian Bug report #680678,
regarding task-ssh-server: depend on 'ssh' instead of 'open
Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>With the amd64 netinst CD I have found a spot in the maze of helpful
>"expert" options offered when the CD first boots that lets me choose
>which Desktop Environment will be installed later on by tasksel. This
>is really nice because it means I don't have to have a sepa
Package: iso-scan
Version: 1.43
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have a multi-boot usb drive that I keep multiple linux iso's on.
I set up the debian installer on my drive using the kernel and initrd from
here: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
amd64/current/ima
Ben Hutchings (25/02/2013):
> On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 23:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > No objection here, feel free to upload. And sorry for the delay.
>
> Done.
ACK for unblock-udeb too. No big testing done yet, but any regressions
would quickly show up in the dailies, so… we'll know soon
I haven't done it before but now I tried to replace libata.atapi_passthru16=0
against libata.force=noncq and it was successful. Which of both solutions would
you prefer?
time /lib/udev/ata_id --export /dev/sr0 returns:
ID_ATA=1
ID_TYPE=cd
ID_BUS=ata
ID_MODEL=ATAPI_DVD_A_DH16ABSH
ID_MODEL_ENC=AT
On 02/26/2013 07:43 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
26.02.2013 03:21, John Spencer wrote:
[ quoting the full mail of lasse since it didnt make its way into the bb
maillist yet ]
Additionally there has been a discussion and attempts to cook up a
patch in Debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/686502 ,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.49
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
12 matches
Mail list logo
