Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 699192 netcfg
Bug #699192 [installation-reports] installation-reports: French translation for
message displayed in case of invalid hostname is wrong
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'netcfg'.
Ignoring request to alte
reassign 699192 netcfg
thanks
Quoting Thierry Rascle (thier...@free.fr):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n d-i
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When the user types in an invalid hostname, a message is displayed to explain
> which characters are allowed in a hostname, and wha
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> > > > I suspect e8ae8876bcea30cc45bcba25ed1e9ea2a317aff0 to be safe and a
> > > > good idea.I have however no idea for
> > > > 1ec13c5a378076c10988237972d4df0f1eefafd3, given my own C-fu..:-)
> > >
> > > It made the jenkins build stable and was non
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hello,
>
> Christian PERRIER (11/01/2013):
> > Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> >
> > > I think we should include this change in wheezy.
> >
> > +1...unless Cyril really wants us to be feature-frozen during the RC
> > stage, which would
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 28 05:48 debian-cd@pettersson 6sidmulti-arch
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/6sidmulti-arch
Totals: 170 builds (1 failed, 0 old)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Dear all,
I just want to report a little feedback about EFI testing distribution. I
wasn't able install debian wheezy on my Dell Inspiron 14z. Same problem both
for the official beta4 build and the test build 5 [1] : black screen. When I
boot the cd it shows the main menu correctly but when I c
Sorry, this can be considered as a duplicate of bug #688336
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:58:01 +0100
Source: finish-install
Binary: finish-install
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrie
finish-install_2.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
finish-install_2.42.dsc
finish-install_2.42.tar.gz
finish-install_2.42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
finish-install_2.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
finish-install_2.42.dsc
finish-install_2.42.tar.gz
finish-install_2.42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:57:08 +0100
Source: cdrom-checker
Binary: cdrom-checker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
cdrom-checker_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.24.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.24.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.24_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-r
cdrom-checker_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.24.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.24.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.24_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.57
Tags: patch
This is a patch from one of our users to fix detection of multi btrfs
pools/volumes in os-prober.
Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888341
Description:
1. regular ext2 partitions are used for /boot
2. There are two separate btrf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 699156 apt-setup
Bug #699156 [debian-installer] debian-installer: d-i should offer users the
installation of backported packages
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'apt-setup'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-
reassign 699156 apt-setup
forcemerge 691651 699156
thanks
Quoting Andreas Glaeser (bugs.andreas.glae...@freenet.de):
> question asked. Probably using backported packages should not be the default
> in debian,
> but at least for expert-installations the user should be asked wether
> backported p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze4+b2
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When I set up a new i486-system (i.e.32-bit-PC) yesterday, I had to add
backported
packages manually and take care about pinnin
On 2013-01-28 02:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Christian PERRIER (03/01/2013):
>> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>>> I'd like you to figure out whether you want the *.po updates from
>>> 1.92 to 1.94 in master to be cherry-picked in the wheezy branch
>>> which is the base for a 1.92+deb
On 2013-01-28 02:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Christian PERRIER (06/01/2013):
>> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>>> Christian PERRIER (03/01/2013):
Well, it had two translation updates, one being Jordi's
harmonization of "double l" in Catalan, so it might be good to have
>>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
