Bug#651720: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid

2012-11-20 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Hi Arno! Sorry, I somehow didn't have 651...@bugs.debian.org copied on my previous mail so I'm inlining your mail for the benefit of the BTS: On 20/11/12 23:19, Arno Töll wrote: I am not sure if checking for / being ZFS is good enough then. Would

debootstrap_1.0.44_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-11-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:55:53 +0100 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.44 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyr

Bug#693718: marked as done (debootstrap: wrong 'for' in kldstat checks for freebsd)

2012-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:47:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693718: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.44 has caused the Debian Bug report #693718, regarding debootstrap: wrong 'for' in kldstat checks for freebsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.44_amd64.changes

2012-11-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debootstrap_1.0.44_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.44.dsc debootstrap_1.0.44.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.44_all.deb debootstrap-udeb_1.0.44_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To U

Re: Bug#651720: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid

2012-11-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Arno! Sorry, I somehow didn't have 651...@bugs.debian.org copied on my previous mail so I'm inlining your mail for the benefit of the BTS: On 20/11/12 23:19, Arno Töll wrote: > I am not sure if checking for / being ZFS is good enough then. Wouldn't > we need to check for any file system being

Bug#651720: Fwd: Re: Bug#651720: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid

2012-11-20 Thread Arno Töll
[Err, sorry sent the message everywhere but to the bug] Hi Steven, On 11/16/2012 10:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I noticed some relevant code in the grub-installer script that seems to > do that: > >> if [ "$bootfstype" = "zfs" ]; then >> # Required by update-grub on ZFS >> mkdir

Re: Bug#651720: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid

2012-11-20 Thread Arno Töll
Hi Steven, On 11/16/2012 10:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I noticed some relevant code in the grub-installer script that seems to > do that: > >> if [ "$bootfstype" = "zfs" ]; then >> # Required by update-grub on ZFS >> mkdir -p $ROOT/boot/zfs >> cp /boot/zfs/zpool.cache $ROOT

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2012-11-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: reassign -1 flash-kernel 3.3 Control: severity -1 serious Suschman (20/11/2012): > Package: debian-installer > Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro > Severity: grave > Tags: d-i > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > Clean installing Debi

Processed: Re: Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2012-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 flash-kernel 3.3 Bug #693839 [debian-installer] debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'flash-kernel'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of b

Bug#693485: Re[2]: Bug#693485: keyboard-configuration: XKBLAYOUT, XKBOPTIONS values manually set in /etc/default/keyboard lost on upgrade

2012-11-20 Thread Bob Bib
Anton Zinoviev: > 3. Whether this bug is reproducible or console-setup no longer > overwrites your manual settings. I've noticed this behavior on 2 Debian installations; it occured on package upgrade (1.82 -> 1.87) only and doesn't happen on every reboot. I'm not sure whether it's caused by unco

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

2012-11-20 Thread Suschman
Package: debian-installer Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Clean installing Debian 7 with Beta3 netinstall on Linkstation Pro/Live fails kernel install. Started by copying uImage and initrd

Bug#690586: installation-reports: NVIDIA GF108 [Quadro 1000M] 10de:0dfa (rev a1) X fails with nouveau/linux-3.2

2012-11-20 Thread Sven Joachim
Control: severity -1 important Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: found -1 3.2.23-1 Control: fixed -1 3.3-1~experimental.1 Am 20.11.2012 um 19:29 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:57:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > [...] >> Could you please try a 3.3 kernel from snapsh

Processed: Re: Bug#690586: installation-reports: NVIDIA GF108 [Quadro 1000M] 10de:0dfa (rev a1) X fails with nouveau/linux-3.2

2012-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #690586 [installation-reports] installation-reports: NVIDIA GF108 [Quadro 1000M] 10de:0dfa (rev a1) X fails with nouveau/linux-3.2 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > reassign -1 src:linux Bug #690586 [installation-reports] installa

Bug#690586: installation-reports: NVIDIA GF108 [Quadro 1000M] 10de:0dfa (rev a1) X fails with nouveau/linux-3.2

2012-11-20 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi Sven, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:57:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: [...] > Could you please try a 3.3 kernel from snapshot.debian.org¹? There were > various i2c related nouveau commits in that version, so maybe it would > be sufficient to backport them. > ¹ > http://snapshot.debian.org/arch

Bug#690586: installation-reports: NVIDIA GF108 [Quadro 1000M] 10de:0dfa (rev a1) X fails with nouveau/linux-3.2

2012-11-20 Thread Sven Joachim
Am 20.11.2012 um 08:49 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt: > Find attached two netconsole logs that look more helpful: "unknown i2c > port". Interesting news: The machine does not lock up completely, > the log continues and after a few minutes I switched off the machine > by pressing the power button for

Re: Proposal to add patches to netcfg (#682737)

2012-11-20 Thread Philipp Kern
Luca, am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:13:37PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:42:14 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > * ba5ee42 Write out network-manager configuration files with mode 0600. > [...] > > * 4e1dbbd finish-install: Do not set /etc/network/interfaces to mode 0600.

Re: Proposal to add patches to netcfg (#682737)

2012-11-20 Thread Michael Biebl
On 20.11.2012 14:13, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:42:14 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> * ba5ee42 Write out network-manager configuration files with mode 0600. > [...] NM config files need to be 0600, so this is correct. >> * 4e1dbbd finish-install: Do not set /etc/ne

Re: Proposal to add patches to netcfg (#682737)

2012-11-20 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:42:14 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > * ba5ee42 Write out network-manager configuration files with mode 0600. [...] > * 4e1dbbd finish-install: Do not set /etc/network/interfaces to mode 0600. [...] > So we need libuuid only on non-Linux platforms (I hope it still com

Re: Proposal to add patches to netcfg (#682737)

2012-11-20 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, so your patches looked very good, and as Michael already mailed, they have been merged (but not yet uploaded). I need to try yet another installation with the desktop task activated, which takes a fair while. Afterwards it should be uploaded, hit the dailies and hopefully not be the cause of m

Bug#693485: keyboard-configuration: XKBLAYOUT, XKBOPTIONS values manually set in /etc/default/keyboard lost on upgrade

2012-11-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 04:15:06AM +0400, Bob Bib wrote: > > after upgrading the whole 'console-setup' package from 1.82 to 1.87 > version, I've lost my XKBLAYOUT and XKBOPTIONS variable values > manually set in '/etc/default/keyboard'; Can you give us the following information: 1. The origina