On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Gilbert (25/10/2012):
>> I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra time
>> is in case you want to do a maintainer upload instead. See attached
>> patch.
>
> The changelog entry really should be more descriptiv
Michael Gilbert (25/10/2012):
> I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra time
> is in case you want to do a maintainer upload instead. See attached
> patch.
The changelog entry really should be more descriptive IMVHO. Reading
it gives no clue as to which problem is getting
Cyril Brulebois (28/10/2012):
> If you want to see packages migrate from sid to testing before that,
> please speak up. I'm tempted to keep everything l10n-ish for release
> candidates (beta 4 might be the last beta).
I've performed the ReleaseGoals page rename dance accordingly:
- old: http://w
Hello Joachim,
here's what Holger replied:
Holger Wansing (23/10/2012):
> I tested the lilo bootloader on a x86 Virtual Box with the beta3
> netinst CD image:
> - Installation was a complete success.
> - Booting the new system also works without problems.
> (The /etc/lilo.conf also contains th
Hi folks,
sorry, I hadn't found time yet to let you know about the prospective
plans for beta 4. I also haven't found time to read most of the last ~
200 mails on -boot@ but baring regressions in beta 3 (privext handling
for netcfg/NM comes to mind, which got worked around already), I'm
tempted to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 690994 unetbootin
Bug #690994 [installation-reports] [installation-reports] xfce on btrfs,
network install image, no kernel found, btrfs-utils missing
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'unetbootin'.
Ignoring request t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This is a "pre-upload unblock request" for mdadm/3.2.5-4.
Recently, upstream released a new version of mdadm, v3.2.6,
which contains only bugfixes or documentation improvements.
I'm cherry
reassign 690994 unetbootin
thanks
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:33:14 +0200
> From: Jean-Louis Biasini
> To: Holger Wansing
> Subject: Re: Bug#690994: [installation-reports] xfce on btrfs, network
> install
> image, no kernel found, btrfs-utils missing
>
>
> Yes I meant btrfs-tools.
> Actually
On 28/10/2012 19:06, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I'm reluctant to upload tasksel as of now, because of that change,
> which I'm unsure if it's inline with the freeze policy
I has been reverted before previous uploads… and committed back after
that. I guess you could do the same this time as well.
Forward to bug
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:33:14 +0200
From: Jean-Louis Biasini
To: Holger Wansing
Subject: Re: Bug#690994: [installation-reports] xfce on btrfs, network install
image, no kernel found, btrfs-utils missing
Yes I meant btrfs-tools.
Actually the lack of linux kernel installation
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:28:48PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:23 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Hopefully corrected now:
> Correct.
>
> However I wonder if it should also be mentioned that the lo
> interface (for 127.0.0.1) does not come up, too, which leads to
> interesting effec
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> Package: task-gnome-desktop
> Version: 3.13
> Severity: important
>
> The system-config-printer package is still installed by default.
>
> The GNOME control center now includes a configuration tool for cups, and
> the settings daemon replaces the fea
Fred, le Sun 28 Oct 2012 15:01:54 +0100, a écrit :
> Le dim. 28 oct. 2012 12:08:25 CET,
> Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> > And it was discussed again in #630575, with the same conclusion: that
> > conflicts with the goal of simplicity & small size of the installer,
> > we don't really want to doub
Le dim. 28 oct. 2012 12:08:25 CET,
Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> And it was discussed again in #630575, with the same conclusion: that
> conflicts with the goal of simplicity & small size of the installer,
> we don't really want to double the amount of layouts proposed in the
> debian installer (ye
Fred, le Sun 28 Oct 2012 11:35:58 +0100, a écrit :
> For information, I also requested to add this layout for the Squeeze
> installer (see #550962), and Christian didn't find it pertinent, I hope
> this time will be the good one :-)
And it was discussed again in #630575, with the same conclusion:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: hdmedia's kernel+initrd, and netinst multi-arch CD (on the
usbkey) Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta3/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b3-amd64-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 28/10/2012
Machine: IBM Thinkpad X201
Processor: I5
Mem
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:16:17 +0100
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.100
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Philipp Kern
Hello,
Jean-Louis Biasini wrote:
> 1. At the end of the phase "installing base package" the installer told
> me he couldn't find any kernel package to install (on net install I
> would expect him to see on the network but the network is still not
> configured at this stage. I continued and get
netcfg_1.100_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.100.dsc
netcfg_1.100.tar.gz
netcfg_1.100_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.100_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 691651 apt-setup
Bug #691651 [debian-installer] Please add backports configuration to
/etc/apt/sources.list
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'apt-setup'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #691651 to the sam
reassign 691651 apt-setup
thanks
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> please consider adding a sources.list configuration for (wheezy)
> backports during the installation.
> Commenting them out by default would probably be a safe
21 matches
Mail list logo
