> I see processes such as:
> "grub-mount /dev/mapper/vg1-SomeLogicalVolume /var/lib/os-prober/mount"
Can you all see if you have anything in common with these vg
partitions? Also, can you analyze the output from manually running
the seemingly hanging process?
# grub-mount /dev/mapper/vg
Also,
It seems that Windows sometimes installs legacy bootloader even on UEFI
systems. This causes os-prober to put chainload entry for legacy boot in
grub2 menu, which fails to boot on UEFI.
Attached are suggested patches, which
- skip legacy MS loader detection on UEFI platform
- add framework for se
I've been thinking about how bootloader installation is handled, and think I
have some good ideas, but would like to run them past the collected wisdom
of my fellow derivativists and debian-boot. Feel free to reply to either or
both lists; I'm subscribed to both Feel free to reply to either or both
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
-- Package-specific info:
USB stick + netinst
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
+
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 686096 normal
Bug #686096 [partman-lvm] LVM partman corruption of logical partitions on same
extended partition
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
68
severity 686096 normal
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121013193330.gh20...@gpm.stappers.nl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The Debian installer is not the cause here
> reassign 688346 initramfs-tools 0.107
Bug #688346 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Impossible boot with
LVM crypted disk on non-QWERTY keyboard
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-r
severity: normal
thanks
> Therefore, I believe the wrong value was cached somewhere within partman
Or some thing else that is wrong.
But the severity is not critical.
The bugreporter can reproduce "the bug".
It would a bug (without quotes) when it is reproduceable with two disks.
Currently is "
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The problems depicted by 688064 and 688346 have not the same cause. I will
> close 688346 (my next command to come) because it had been fixed by a new
> package version, while 688064 is still current
> unmerge 688064
Bug #688064 [installation-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 690350 apt-setup
Bug #690350 [debian-installer] d-i: Offline installation only with CD-ROM
failed
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'apt-setup'.
No longer marked as found in versions beta2.
Ignoring request to alter fixe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 690353 lilo-installer
Bug #690353 [debian-installer] d-i: lilo cannot be used - lack of initrd entry
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'lilo-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions beta2.
Ignoring request to alte
On Sat 13 Oct 2012 at 18:25:17 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> I have attached four patches which hopefully remove any occurances
> of businesscard/business card in the Manual.
I forgot to say that removing the word "businesscard" from pkgsel.xml
turned the paragraph into nonsense. So I rewote it.
In the thread starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2012/07/msg00067.html
the intention to cease producing businesscard images is declared,
Using a text version of the Manual at
http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.i386/
I found a number of references to this image. Looking at the sou
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:03:59AM +0200, Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 11:13 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
> >>Deja vu: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606636
> >>To me it is still a bug, although other
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:10:04PM -0400, Anthony L. Awtrey wrote:
> I am tracing through the segfault in my environment and will post
> updates / patches as I get them.
Well, it's pretty clear what's happening. A null pointer (hostname) is passed
into a function (netcfg_get_hostname) which expect
On 13.10.2012 09:43, Mike Hommey wrote:
> That being said, I think we should actively advise people to use
> backports for iceweasel. Making that statement part of the release notes
> might be a good idea. Possibly with a working pinning setup.
>
> Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the work
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:30:55 +0200
with message-id <20121013073055.gh5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690351: installation-reports: Succesful install of 7.0
beta 2 with one extra debconf question
has caused the Debian Bug report #690351,
regarding installat
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:32:00 +0200
with message-id <20121013073200.gi5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690333: Installation of Wheezy successfully on Acer
Aspire One 532h
has caused the Debian Bug report #690333,
regarding Installation of Wheezy successfully
Quoting Bernhard (bewoe...@yahoo.de):
> No problems detected:
> - ISO image was found at USB Stick
> - Installation was done with WLAN (WPA2)
Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as
usual with reports for successful installations: I close the bug..:-)
This does not of cours
19 matches
Mail list logo
