i'm using amd64 iso image
2012/8/6 samuel arellano
> hi, since about ten days ago I have a problem trying to install debian
> testing, I boot from usb stick and in the step of "detecting network
> hardware" the screen keeps blue, I've tried with many images downloaded in
> differentes days and t
with people starting with Debian.
Installing from USB and next line in that file are not compatible (or
you need to mount Usb like it were a CD):
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Wheezy_ - Official Snapshot amd64
DVD Binary-1 20120806-05:09]/ wheezy contrib main
Thank you !
--
Pleas
hi, since about ten days ago I have a problem trying to install debian
testing, I boot from usb stick and in the step of "detecting network
hardware" the screen keeps blue, I've tried with many images downloaded in
differentes days and the problem remains.
I hope you can answer me
thanks
alex, le Mon 06 Aug 2012 14:43:32 -0600, a écrit :
> tanks, but its more easy to my friends to install DEBIAN with this
> tool
> http://sliceoflinux.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/instalar-ubuntu-9-10-06_animado.gif
As always, help to integrate such thing is simply welcome.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSC
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 04:44 +0900, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Alejandro Alcántar, le Sat 21 Jul 2012 13:37:39 -0600, a écrit :
> >>hi, i love debian , but went recommend to my friends , the have
> >>problems to re-size a partition and install with windows together, then
> >>thast why end to reco
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:07:02 +0200
with message-id <20120806200702.gr9...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684048: installation-reports: Successful installation
from CD netinst Beta1 on PC amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #684048,
regarding installation-rep
[Previously sent to debian-user list, was advised here was
more appropriate]
I have two objectives:
1. Define, by experimentation, optimal installation
parameters to meet my
idiosyncratic concept of a "minimal install".
2. Determine if there are bugs in Debian Installer, the
instr
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 681656 hw-detect
> Bug #681656 [debian-installer] Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install
> Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'hw-detect'.
> No longer
Quoting Brian Potkin (claremont...@gmail.com):
> ethernet interfaces do not. At the 'Detect network hardware' stage the
> process hung and the d-i screen remained blue.
>
> Another machine behaved in a similar fashion but on a third the expected
> message about missing firware was displayed. This
On Sun 05 Aug 2012 at 09:02:54 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > It look like the two "hangs" result from trying to find the firmware files
> > iwlwifi-2030-6.ucode (for WiFi) and rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw (for wired
> > ethernet). This seems to be the same problem as in bugs #683690 and #683692.
>
Accepted:
mountmedia_0.21.dsc
to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21.dsc
mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz
to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz
mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb
to main/m/mountmedia/mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb
Changes:
mountmedia (0.21) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Karsten Merker ]
* Do
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:43:12 +0100
with message-id <20120806184312.gg24...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #679984,
regarding installation-report: Wheezy installed successfully on Asus P5B with
alpha1 installer from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677519 installation-guide
Bug #677519 [installation-reports] installation-reports: 32 or 64 bit?
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'installation-guide'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677519 to the sa
mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mountmedia_0.21.dsc
mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz
mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:39:24 +0100
with message-id <20120806183924.ge24...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #662108,
regarding Installation on Acer Aspire One 532h
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:38:47 +0100
with message-id <20120806183847.gd24...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #661834,
regarding Installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 681656 hw-detect
Bug #681656 [debian-installer] Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'hw-detect'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20120508.
Ignoring request
mountmedia_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
mountmedia_0.21.dsc
mountmedia_0.21.tar.gz
mountmedia_0.21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-req
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:37:44 +0100
with message-id <20120806183744.gc24...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #671682,
regarding Successful Wheezy netinst report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:36:31 +0100
with message-id <20120806183631.gb24...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #660667,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 655005 wifi connection didn't work during installation
Bug #655005 [installation-reports] installation-report
Changed Bug title to 'wifi connection didn't work during installation' from
'installation-report'
> severity 655005 minor
Bug #6
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:30:21 +0100
with message-id <20120806183021.ga23...@einval.com>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report!
has caused the Debian Bug report #650195,
regarding installation-reports: Wheezy 64-bit succesfully installed on a Intel
Core i3 system
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607698 + moreinfo
Bug #607698 [installation-reports] installation-report: squeeze d-i i386 hangs
accessing the hdd (segfault)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607698: ht
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 513565 hw-detect
Bug #513565 [installation-reports] post install bugs
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #513565 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 681610 hw-detect
Bug #681610 [installation-reports] Installation fails during loading firmware
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #681610 to the same values
reassign 681610 hw-detect
thanks
Reassigning firmware loading bugs to hw-detect. There's a number of
bugs showing up here; time to look for patterns so we can fix the
underlying cause(s).
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 613822 hw-detect
Bug #613822 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Squeeze (amd64 and
i386) cannot load NIC firmware from USB during installation for Poweredge 2950
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 547175 hw-detect
Bug #547175 [installation-reports] installation-report: SunBlade 2000: fails to
pick up ql2200_fw.bin from usb stick
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hw-detect'.
No longer marked as found in version
reassign 547175 hw-detect
thanks
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:13:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO.
>>
>>Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware
>>across an
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO.
>
>Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware
>across and reload modules.
Just talking to Leif, he's sure he copied the raw firmware file onto
his USB stick r
The mail client wrapped a line of the patch, please take the attached file:
loadsize.patch
Description: loadsize.patch
I tried to install beta 1 now – this bug is still present:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta1/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-wheezy-DI-b1-amd64-DVD-1.iso
The workaround mentioned in Message #35 works for me.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
Source: debian-cd
A patch proposal for the package debian-cd package of Wheezy.
It turned out that the script 'tools/boot/wheezy/boot-ia64' in the
debian-cd source package gives genisoimage the switches
-no-emul-boot
-b boot/boot.img
-c boot/boot.catalog
in similar way as I did it in my last
Ritesh Raj Sarraf (06/08/2012):
> Release Team,
>
> Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this
> migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is
> anything I can do to speed up the process.
>
> PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I wi
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:25 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:04:08PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix
> > it up now.
>
> dch should do this by itself in the meantime. Otherwise add
> DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HE
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 19:10:31 +0400, Darren Baginski wrote:
> Perhaps I mistakenly though that there is/was two keyboard configuration:
> one for console, another for X.
> keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap applies for both of them?
>
Yes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
05.08.2012, 23:39, "Cyril Brulebois" :
> Hello,
>
> Darren Baginski (05/08/2012):
>
>> I'm testing "Debian Installer 7.0 Beta1" with the same pressed I have
>> for Squeeze for a long time.
>
> did you read the announce?
>
>> For some reason new installer asks me about "Keymap to use:".
>> Bu
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
This is a report of a successful installation.
Congratulations for the work and thank you very much.
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-
latest/amd64/
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:04:08PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Yes, I normally would, don't know how I missed it this time. I'll go fix
> it up now.
dch should do this by itself in the meantime. Otherwise add
DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog
to ~/.devscripts.
Bastian
--
Each kiss is as th
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk):
> > > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > > commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6
> > > Author: I
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk):
> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6
> > Author: Ian Campbell
> > Date: Tue Jul 10 21:20:51 2012 +
> >
> >
Release Team,
Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this
migrate to testing?
As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up
the process.
PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it.
I hope we can close this soon. T
Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk):
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 4ac8107d9338cd0ff48c1223529516359c32fec6
> Author: Ian Campbell
> Date: Tue Jul 10 21:20:51 2012 +
>
> Add Dreamplug device (Kirkwood)
>
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/d
Installed from the 30th of July 2012 DVD ISO.
Same workaround was successful - drop to a shell, manually copy firmware
across and reload modules.
Christian PERRIER, le Mon 06 Aug 2012 08:27:56 +0200, a écrit :
> Dunno what the "?" means
It means not to fail if the module does not actually exist, which is
useful when the availability depends on the arch.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Hello,
just replying for the sake of people reading -boot@ and wondering:
Philipp Kern (06/08/2012):
> This is fine from a RT point of view, thanks. But given that this package
> needs the d-i RM ACK and I couldn't find a definite answer in the archives,
> this still needs confirmation. KiBi?
I
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:33:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Please unblock package busybox.
>
> The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was
> unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix
> merely removes "__attribute__(aligned(1))" and similar quali
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...
Concerning package cdebconf-gtk...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed priority from optional to extra
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further commen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package busybox.
The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was
unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix
merely removes "__attribut
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 02:26:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Petr Salinger (03/08/2012):
> > > Just keeping you posted. The change looks reasonable, but the
> > > package needs a separate ACK from the d-i team. Last I heard from
> > > them, they requested that we hold all udebs for now.
>
On 06.08.2012 12:18, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> could you request an unblock for the busybox in unstable if you're happy with
> it?
I waited for the usual 10 days to finish. And meanwhile I've a
few more fixes for it which are worth to add for wheezy, -- not
urgent but nice-to-have.
Hi Michael,
could you request an unblock for the busybox in unstable if you're happy with
it?
Thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 14:30 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell :
> > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:37 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>
> >> > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-)
> >>
> >> No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1.
>
On 6 August 2012 14:33, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> These semantics could be enforced by replacing use of aptitude with
>> equivalent calls to apt-get, or updating aptitude to 0.6.9 series (in
>> experimental) which can report the errors similar to apt-get. IMO
>> apt-get is preferable because it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 661069 + release-notes
Bug #661069 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is
installed or the user warned about its lack.
Bug #660734 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is
installed or the user warne
55 matches
Mail list logo
