Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 612165 + pending
Bug #612165 [installation-guide-i386] installation-guide-i386: Booting from
Linux Using Grub - menu.lst changed to grub.cfg
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #612165 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping proc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 666105 + pending
Bug #666105 [installation-guide] [installation-guide] 5.1.4. Booting from USB
Memory Stick: No prompt when installing the flexible way
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Hello,
Ulrich Krause, le Thu 03 May 2012 12:08:22 +0200, a écrit :
> The line in "/etc/dhcp3/dhcp.conf" regarding the filename should read
>
> ' filename "pxelinux.0";'
>
> (instead of ' filename "/pxelinux.0";'
It seems it was already fixed in another place. I don't see why '/'
should be ne
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: armel Jul 03 08:06 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* FAILED BUILD: armel Jul 03 08:07 buildd@ancina
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk_0.171_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.171_i386.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.171_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.171_i386.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.171_i386.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.171_i386.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.171_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.171_all.u
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.69_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.69_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.69_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.69_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.69_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.69_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.69.dsc
to main/a/apt-setup
cdebconf_0.171_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.171.dsc
cdebconf_0.171.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.171_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.171_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.171_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.171_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.171_i386.deb
cd
cdebconf_0.171_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.171.dsc
cdebconf_0.171.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.171_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.171_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.171_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.171_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.171_i
apt-setup_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.69.dsc
apt-setup_0.69.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.69_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.69_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.69_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.deb
apt-setup_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.69.dsc
apt-setup_0.69.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.69_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.69_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.69_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on hos
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 03 Jul 2012 13:35:50 -0300, a écrit :
> Simon Eigeldinger, le Tue 03 Jul 2012 17:39:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > does adding accessibility packages increase dvd size and cd size so much?
> > thought those where not that big those packages.
>
> Size for dvd and cd is not a proble
Simon Eigeldinger, le Tue 03 Jul 2012 17:39:21 +0200, a écrit :
> does adding accessibility packages increase dvd size and cd size so much?
> thought those where not that big those packages.
Size for dvd and cd is not a problem. It's size for netinst which is,
and it's the same initrd which is use
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.42_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.42_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.42.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.42.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.42.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.42.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.42_all.deb
to main/d/debootstrap
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:38 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
> >
> > debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >
> > * Downgrade the absence of an I
debootstrap_1.0.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.42.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.42.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.42_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UN
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
>
> debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to an
> info
> message.
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:28 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ian Campbell (03/07/2012):
> > And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
> >
> > debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >
> > * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to
Ian Campbell (03/07/2012):
> And debootstrap 1.0.42 which contains (Joey+Colin CCd):
>
> debootstrap (1.0.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to an
> info
> message. For now, debootstrap can cope fine
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 08:53 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > Hello,
> >
> > It'd be good to migrate to testing for b1 also espeakup (just
> > translations) and brltty (description fixup, and d-i udev hardware list
> > update).
>
>
> The same s
Christian PERRIER (03/07/2012):
> Quoting Luca Capello (l...@pca.it):
> > I would like to import the current code into a Git repository and
> > then add all the changes, but I was wondering if such a code is
> > already available somewhere. I quickly looked through the web
> > interface of the SV
Quoting Luca Capello (l...@pca.it):
> I would like to import the current code into a Git repository and then
> add all the changes, but I was wondering if such a code is already
> available somewhere. I quickly looked through the web interface of the
> SVN d-i repository [7], with no success. An
Hi there!
For the RMLL 2012 [1] I re-installed the Debian Events Box machine [2]
after the previous installation for FOSDEM 2012 [3]. While the latter
was squeeze, the former is wheezy, given that we froze and thus we can
give an idea of the next stable version (also with the new theme [4]).
[1]
Hi sir,
Shenzhen LEDTECH Lighting co.ltd is here,exporting led module with high quality
and competitive price.Product is as follows:
Injection led module(IP65),piranha led module,waterproof epoxy led module and
non-waterproof led module and so on.
Any interests,pls contact me free,specification
24 matches
Mail list logo
