Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 16 08:11 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 16 08:12 buildd@ancina
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 03:18 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice
> > to watch credits in the future.
> > It would also have been nice to upload a new version focusing
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 15:30:36 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> Is this problem still there and/or is there any plan to work on this for
> wheezy?
>
Please don't send such messages without any context. Referring to a bug
as "this problem" with just "ping" as a subject is just not helpful.
You mig
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 610885 important
Bug #610885 [partman-base] default install fails on kfreebsd-amd64
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610885: http://bugs.debian.org/
severity 610885 important
thanks
Quoting Arne Wichmann (a...@anhrefn.saar.de):
> Is this problem still there and/or is there any plan to work on this for
> wheezy?
I don't really thing this is release critical as there is a workaround.
Thanks for waking this up.
--
signature.asc
Descripti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 579522 important
Bug #579522 [tasksel] tasksel - Removes packages without consent
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 579522 wontfix
Bug #579522 [tasksel] tasksel - Removes packages without consent
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> than
severity 579522 important
tags 579522 wontfix
thanks
Quoting Arne Wichmann (a...@anhrefn.saar.de):
> Ok, squeeze is long gone and this serious bug is unhandled for more than 18
> months. Is there any plan to fix this?
Many comments in the bug log seem to suggest that the bug is wontfix
and anywa
Is this problem still there and/or is there any plan to work on this for
wheezy?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Plan
Ok, squeeze is long gone and this serious bug is unhandled for more than 18
months. Is there any plan to fix this?
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you b
Accepted:
zipl-installer_0.0.21.dsc
to main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.21.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
to main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.21_s390.udeb
to main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.21_s390.udeb
Changes:
zipl-installer (0.0.
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.32.dsc
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.32.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.32.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.32.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.32_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.32_s390.udeb
Changes:
s390-netdevice (0.0.
Accepted:
s390-dasd_0.0.28.dsc
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.28.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.28.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.28.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.28_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.28_s390.udeb
Changes:
s390-dasd (0.0.28) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Updated translati
s390-netdevice_0.0.32_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.32.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.32.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.32_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
zipl-installer_0.0.21_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zipl-installer_0.0.21.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.21_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
s390-dasd_0.0.28_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-dasd_0.0.28.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.28.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.28_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@l
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:44:58PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> S390:
> s390-netdevice
> s390-dasd
> zipl-installer
Done for s390. s390x should be autobuilt.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.60_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.60_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.60_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.60_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.60_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.60_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.60.dsc
to main/a/apt-setup
apt-setup_0.60_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.60.dsc
apt-setup_0.60.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.60_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.60_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.60_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.de
Accepted:
udpkg_1.14.dsc
to main/u/udpkg/udpkg_1.14.dsc
udpkg_1.14.tar.gz
to main/u/udpkg/udpkg_1.14.tar.gz
udpkg_1.14_i386.udeb
to main/u/udpkg/udpkg_1.14_i386.udeb
Changes:
udpkg (1.14) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload
* Replace XC-package-Type with Package-Type
.
[ Joey H
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_44.dsc
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_44.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_44.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_44.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_44_all.udeb
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_44_all.udeb
Changes:
partman-auto-lvm (44) unstab
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:02:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665852: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.60
has caused the Debian Bug report #665852,
regarding UI still refers to volatile.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
partman-auto-lvm_44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_44.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_44.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
partman-auto-lvm_44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_44.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_44.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
udpkg_1.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
udpkg_1.14.dsc
udpkg_1.14.tar.gz
udpkg_1.14_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
udpkg_1.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
udpkg_1.14.dsc
udpkg_1.14.tar.gz
udpkg_1.14_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.o
As you probably noticed, I mass-uploaded D-I packages yesterday. I
didn't use Otavios' mass-upload script as I prefer building with
pbuilder/cowbuilder and...I also like to chek lintian's output.
I still need to have the following packages uploaded, for non
i386/amd64 architectures:
PowerPC:
part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 677460 libmeep-lam4-dev/1.1.1-8
Bug #677460 [libmeep-lam4-dev,libmeep-mpich2-dev] libmeep-mpich2-dev and
libmeep-lam4-dev: error when trying to install together
The source libmeep-lam4-dev and version 1.1.1-8 do not appear to match any
bin
Hi,
(2nd mail like this as some mail addresses were incorrect in PO files)
In preparation for the release, a last minute change was made to
strings belonging to the apt-setup repository.
This D-I component prompts users about activation of extra package
repositories. In the past, this was "volat
28 matches
Mail list logo
