Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:04 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 30 00:05 buildd@barber b
Thanks for the cleanups. Anyway, is there any problems with the fix?
Source: libglib2.0-udeb
Version: 2.32.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
What $subject says. Please double check stuff when adding new
dependencies. And probably disable the libelf stuff for the udeb build
if possible.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about
> in deep.
It's not, and you should.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
> >On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> To what we had for a1 basically:
> >>
> >> get CD images built (Steve, yey!);
> >> test them
> >> finish ann
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> To what we had for a1 basically:
>>
>> get CD images built (Steve, yey!);
>> test them
>> finish announce mail
>> mail to to d-d-a if all above work
>
>How are things goi
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> To what we had for a1 basically:
>
> get CD images built (Steve, yey!);
> test them
> finish announce mail
> mail to to d-d-a if all above work
How are things going with that?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
> organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
> myself with, some suggested dates:
It looks like the discussion has converged towards:
> May 12/
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:43 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> By the way, I have a question. What is the difference between
> the netboot and the xen image ? I thought I would need the xen
> image on the Amazon cloud, but it worked well with the
> simple netboot (which is good as the xen image did n
9 matches
Mail list logo