Dear all,
Ubuntu's patched network-console can retrieve a public key from a fixed and
secure location, which allows one to log in the installer without pre-defined
password (such as "r00tme" in the example preseed file). I am not aware of
problems arising from this patch, and Colin Watson was qui
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:02:28 +0200
with message-id <20120327220228.59f4d478.li...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Wheezy (testing) installation: works fine now
has caused the Debian Bug report #641854,
regarding installation-reports: d-i daily 2011-10-03 kfreebsd-amd64 missing
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:02:28 +0200
with message-id <20120327220228.59f4d478.li...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Wheezy (testing) installation: works fine now
has caused the Debian Bug report #641854,
regarding [kfreebsd-i386] installation-reports: installation fails due to
mi
tags 665885 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 06:41:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Is this what you are looking for?
> >
> > % more debian/libcomerr2/DEBIAN/shlibs
> > libcom_err 2 libcomerr2 (>= 1.33-3)
> > udeb: libcom_err 2 e2fsprogs-udeb (>= 1.33-3)
>
> Yep, that looks like what
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Ad
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 665856 grub-installer
Bug #665856 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Fails to install GRUB on a
Sony VPCZ2 laptop with two SSD drives in RAID 0
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'.
Ignoring request to alt
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:14:10AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > If I'm correct there is no more volatile at all.
>
> There's still the $codename-updates suite. I personally don't care if it's
> not
> deactivatable in d-i, but given that security updates are, it proba
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk_0.160_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.160_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.160_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.160_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.160_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.160_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.160_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.160
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:14:10AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> If I'm correct there is no more volatile at all.
There's still the $codename-updates suite. I personally don't care if it's not
deactivatable in d-i, but given that security updates are, it probably makes
sense.
Kind regards,
P
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt
> > > wrote:
> > > >> partman-nbd
> > > >
> > > >
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665718: fixed in cdebconf 0.160
has caused the Debian Bug report #665718,
regarding black screen when stating graphical installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
cdebconf_0.160_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.160.dsc
cdebconf_0.160.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.160_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.160_amd64.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.160_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.160_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.160_amd64.deb
Den 27-03-2012 19:59, Julien Cristau skrev:
On #debian-boot:
"...The kernel crashes. If I use the fb=false option I can see the
text output."
That sounds like a separate issue, should be filed in another bug if
somebody can reproduce.
Cheers,
Julien
This is bug #665493 on the amd64 kernel im
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 665718 cdebconf-gtk-udeb 0.159
Bug #665718 [debian-installer] black screen when stating graphical installer
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
No longer marked as found in versions 20120324.
Ignoring re
reassign 665718 cdebconf-gtk-udeb 0.159
kthxbye
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 13:23:22 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> package: debian-installer
> version: 20120324
> tags: d-i
>
> On starting graphical installer the screen becomes black.
> This was verified on virtualbox and on real hardware (P8Z68
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 14:35:23 -0700, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:53:56PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Package: e2fsprogs
> > Version: 1.42.1-2
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: d-i
> >
> > (x-debbugs-cc to debian-boot and the btrfs-tools maintainer)
> >
> > btrfs-tools-ud
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.51_i386.udeb
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.51_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.51.dsc
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.51.dsc
os-prober_1.51.tar.gz
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.51.tar.gz
os-prober_1.51_i386.deb
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.51_i386.deb
Change
/debian-installer/debian-installer_20120327_amd64.deb
Changes:
debian-installer (20120327) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Jurij Smakov ]
* Add pata-modules to cdrom config for sparc and sparc64.
Closes: #610906.
* Use xz compression for initrd during netboot image build for sparc
to get
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661620: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #661620,
regarding Recent hd-media initrd lacks ext4 support; d-i cannot find iso on
such fs
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651641: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #651641,
regarding kfreebsd-amd64: daily debian-installer broken by recent change
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642183: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #642183,
regarding debian-installer: hybrid iso sizing issue for unstable build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637460: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #637460,
regarding Typo in xm-debian.cfg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637339: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #637339,
regarding debian-installer: Adapt the script to run d-i to the Linkstation Mini.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633606: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #633606,
regarding debian-installer: minor grammer changes for installer package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#624144: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #624144,
regarding mklibs-copy is being used instead of mklibs, bloating d-i image size
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621769: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #621769,
regarding please include file-reseed udeb on netboot images
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617943: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #617943,
regarding debian-installer: should dynamically populate KERNELIMAGEVERSION
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#610524: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #610524,
regarding Preseed: Debian Installer asks for keyboard-configuration/variant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600229: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #600229,
regarding installer does not ask for keyboard layout on kfreebsd-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#596596: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #596596,
regarding netboot-gtk target for kfreebsd-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
os-prober_1.51_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.51.dsc
os-prober_1.51.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.51_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.51_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
debian-installer_20120327_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20120327.dsc
debian-installer_20120327.tar.gz
debian-installer_20120327_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20120327_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (ru
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> Package: apt-setup
> Severity: normal
>
> VOL_HOST still appears as volatile.debian.org in the UI, but that is
> thuroughly dead now.
If I'm correct there is no more volatile at all.
So, if this is correct, the change would be disabling everything
related
34 matches
Mail list logo
