Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2012-02-01 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Jan 31 06:07 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jan 31 06:07 buildd@ancina

Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 22:11:29 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > Yeah, I thought that. However I wonder why that is. Where's the ABI > boundary? Old modules keep working with the new kernel. Not necessarily the other way around. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:12:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 22:56:02 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:46:50PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Would you agree that this is a bug ? > > Can you tell me what's broken? > Loading new modules on an ol

Fattura N5849041722.

2012-02-01 Thread Robot
Gentile Cliente La sua societa ha una fattura. Informazioni: http://www.stefanoferrucci.it/statistica/Pagamento.zip?UnBo3XmUAcCm Si prega di pagare fino 2012/02/05 Tel. / Fax.: (771) 309 04 877. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-01 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi all. On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:46:50PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Would you agree that this is a bug ? Can you tell me what's broken? Loading new modules on an old kernel might fail. I don't think this is new, if you want an image that works across point releases you need one that has a

Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 22:56:02 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:46:50PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Would you agree that this is a bug ? > > Can you tell me what's broken? > Loading new modules on an old kernel might fail. I don't think this is new, if you want an ima

Re: My cdebconf is escaped !

2012-02-01 Thread Regis Boudin
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:57 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Regis Boudin wrote: > > * ejabberd. During postinst, cdebconf seems to wait indefinitely on the > > read() in confmodule.c, line 109. The problem only occurs if > > "invoke-rc.d ejabberd start" is called during the postinst script, > > though.

Re: My cdebconf is escaped !

2012-02-01 Thread Joey Hess
Regis Boudin wrote: > * ejabberd. During postinst, cdebconf seems to wait indefinitely on the > read() in confmodule.c, line 109. The problem only occurs if > "invoke-rc.d ejabberd start" is called during the postinst script, > though. Sounds like the typical problem of a daemon inheriting the co

Bug#658037: D-I tries to install Debian on my cellphone instead of loading the firmware

2012-02-01 Thread hec...@btinternet.com
Christian, How do I unsubscribe from this link. I do not recall subscribing Regards, DH _ On 31 Jan 2012 at 7:02, Christian PERRIER wrote: Subject:Bug#658037: D-I tries to install Debian on my cellphone instead of loading the firmware Send reply to: dave.n...@debian.o

Re: Continuing to use old kernels for installation after point releases

2012-02-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:16:41PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > The simplest solution, suggested by several people in the thread, > would be not to remove the old udebs from the archive. I don't know > whether that's possible, but no-one seemed to give an authoritative > answer to that suggestion p

Re: Continuing to use old kernels for installation after point releases

2012-02-01 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Ian Jackson [120131 16:17]: > I have a setup at work which, amongst other things, regularly > autoinstalls Debian. Because I don't want it to break unexpectedly, I > prefer to keep using old installation kernels - for example, new > kernels may have different requirements for non-free firmware