On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:15:06PM +1000, Heddle Weaver wrote:
> I've made a few attempts to install the weekly build (August 22nd,
> netinstall, Wheezy) onto a machine and same drive as an XP install.
> I know it can be done as I did it in the dim past when I was making the
> switch from Microsoft
Hello,
I've made a few attempts to install the weekly build (August 22nd,
netinstall, Wheezy) onto a machine and same drive as an XP install.
I know it can be done as I did it in the dim past when I was making the
switch from Microsoft.
However, as the partitioning stage shows no sign of recognis
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-sparc/current/images/netboot/boot.img
Date: 2011-08-30
Machine: Sun Ultra 10
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-
Accepted:
partman-nbd_0.3.dsc
to main/p/partman-nbd/partman-nbd_0.3.dsc
partman-nbd_0.3.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-nbd/partman-nbd_0.3.tar.gz
partman-nbd_0.3_all.udeb
to main/p/partman-nbd/partman-nbd_0.3_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-nbd_0.3.dsc - source debian-insta
partman-nbd_0.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-nbd_0.3.dsc
partman-nbd_0.3.tar.gz
partman-nbd_0.3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists
Hello,
2011/8/30 Daily build aggregator :
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: armel Aug 29 06:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote:
> can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be
> built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM
> bugs.
Yes; those can be removed.
Thanks by handling it.
--
Otavio Salvador
Hi,
can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be
built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM
bugs.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
Hi!
Am 29.08.2011 20:10, schrieb Michael Gold:
> I had to connect an ethernet dongle because the onboard network port
> wasn't detected by the installer; the onboard port worked after
> upgrading to unstable.
FWIW: I have the very same notebook (but the version without the nvidia
card, only the
9 matches
Mail list logo