Bug#626434: flash-kernel: please add u-boot script support

2011-05-11 Thread Hector Oron
Package: flash-kernel Version: 2.40 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, I have been working out support for u-boot scripts. I would like to know your comments or input about it as might might push it to the efika flash-kernel branch which someday I hope to merge into master. Right now, I a

Bug#375568: busybox-static should include "Provides: busybox"

2011-05-11 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
Hi, Michael. Thanks for the response. Comments below. On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:46 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > initramfs-tools does not depend on busybox indeed, but it > recommends busybox|busybox-initramfs. With default apt > settings that basically translates to depends, since > all Rec

Bug#626299: debian-installer: installer broken on armel - "Can't check signature: public key not found"

2011-05-11 Thread booster
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gerd [2011-05-10 19:51]: > >> May 10 17:29:44 choose-mirror[1718]: INFO: suite/codename set to: >> stable/squeeze >> May 10 17:29:44 choose-mirror[1718]: DEBUG: command: wget -q >> http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian//dists/squeeze/main/binary-armel/Release -O >> - |

art

2011-05-11 Thread thesalon.eu
Hi debian-boot@lists.debian.org buy the best contemporary artprints in the world and check out the latest art news updates, go to : thesalon.eu art design gallery. Mosalodi Barend Meyer http://www.thesalon.eu/artist.htm http://www.thesalon.eu a...@thesalon.eu n...@thesalon.eu 5/11/2011

Re: About LINUX Kernel upgrade.

2011-05-11 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Suman Gangopadhyay (gangopadhyayp...@gmail.com): > Respected Sir / Madam, > > I have tried a lot in upgrading the kernel of my DEBIAN 6.0 from version > 2.6.32 to 2.6.38. Every time, when i try to boot into the new kernel I > get stupendous errors which says to me that "UNABLE TO BOOT INTO

About LINUX Kernel upgrade.

2011-05-11 Thread Suman Gangopadhyay
Respected Sir / Madam, I have tried a lot in upgrading the kernel of my DEBIAN 6.0 from version 2.6.32 to 2.6.38. Every time, when i try to boot into the new kernel I get stupendous errors which says to me that "UNABLE TO BOOT INTO THE KERNEL 2.6.38". Tell me or Guide me through the steps by whic

Re: Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ian Campbell, le Wed 11 May 2011 10:34:27 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit : > > > We could maybe improve the wording to make it clearer than "Speech > > > install". Maybe "Install with ^sp

Re: Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-11 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit : > > > I've attached an example of what I plan to commit: > > > > That's an example, right? Only activating in amd64 GTK netboot is just > > because this is an example, I gues

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-05-11 Thread Christian PERRIER
> Insufficient extends free in the LVM volume group, as always. Fixed now. Oh, great. /me crosses fingers for a completely error-free daily build for the next day...:-) Thanks for all this work, Phil. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-05-11 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-05-11, Daily build aggregator wrote: > Debian installer build overview > --- > > Failed or old builds: > > * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic > > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log > > *

Re: Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-11 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > It does not fit the menu width, only "Install with speech synth" shows > up. "^Speech synthesis install" can fit. "Install with speech synth" has my preference, very slightly. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit : > > I've attached an example of what I plan to commit: > > That's an example, right? Only activating in amd64 GTK netboot is just > because this is an example, I guess. Yes. I plan to do the same for cdrom/hd-media too and on i386 to