On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's
> already a newer version, so it got rejected:
Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.co
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* daily mipsel images build:
The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a
new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the
first two weeks of 2011.
* FAILED BUIL
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.42
Severity: normal
Configuration:
- system is partitioned as follows:
/dev/sda1 = Linux /boot
/dev/sda2 = DOS 6.22
/dev/sda3 = extended partition
/dev/sda5 = Linux LVM PV, containing swap and Linux filesystems
- /dev/sda2 is mounted on /dos
(so the DOS 6.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 612631 + pending
Bug #612631 [installation-guide] debian-installer: error in example-preseed.txt
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
612631: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: Will not boot, so no system, with or without rescue-disk-pc.
Now Debian 6.0.0 is out, should I be sending this report to GRUB
package directly ?
06.03.2011 Fails to boot with Debian sid, unstable grub-rescue-pc
1.99~rc1-3 i386,
>From
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 612281 apt-setup
Bug #612281 [installation-reports] installation-reports: volatile reference
instead of squeeze/updates in, installer
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'apt-setup'.
> forcemerge 614862 612281 492937 59
Miguel Figueiredo at "Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:51:00 +" wrote:
MF> Hi all,
MF> Using GeoMirror [1] (aka cdn.debian.net) as default mirror in the default
MF> installation can save decisions and interaction to who is installing and
be a
MF> more automated process.
MF> * Pros:
MF> - 'good'
07.03.2011 01:00, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: whishlist
> Tags: d-i
>
> Latest debian installer on Squeeze Iso disk debian-6.0.0-amd64-BD-1.iso used
> to
> install new computer.
>
> At the level of creating md devices it is not possible to add an bitmap as I
Package: debian-installer
Severity: whishlist
Tags: d-i
Latest debian installer on Squeeze Iso disk debian-6.0.0-amd64-BD-1.iso used to
install new computer.
At the level of creating md devices it is not possible to add an bitmap as I can
do with --bitmap=internal. Please add (for me internal is
Package: debian-installer
Severity: whishlist
Tags: d-i
Latest debian installer on Squeeze Iso disk debian-6.0.0-amd64-BD-1.iso used to
install new computer.
At the level of creating md devices it is not possible give an name to the
created
md device which can be do with --name mdadm option. Ple
Package: debian-installer
Severity: whishlist
Tags: d-i
Latest debian installer on Squeeze Iso disk debian-6.0.0-amd64-BD-1.iso used to
install new computer.
At the level of creating md devices it is not possible to create degraded md
devices.
For example if you have only one disk of two availab
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Lates debian installer on Squeeze Iso disk debian-6.0.0-amd64-BD-1.iso used to
install new computer.
I've created on sda and sdb the same partition configuration:
xen:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sda: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes
25
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
> > stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
> >
> > grub-installer
>
> Do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 614583 debian-cd 3.1.5
Bug #614583 [debian-installer] Boot prompt for powerpc should tell G5 users to
select 'install64' not 'install'
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'debian-cd'.
Bug #614583 [debian-cd] Boot prompt for
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
> doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
> archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
The biggest barrier to this is that Matt sa
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> > And how about hppa builds?
> >
> > IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why
> > D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right?
>
> oops - powered down my hppa box before i went out of town. It should
> be back up & daily b
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
> doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
> archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
>
> Where would one find the patch for #614
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.dsc
to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.tar.gz
to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_all.deb
to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_all.deb
Override
Reject Reasons:
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1.dsc: old version (1.62) in unstable >= new version
(1.60+squeeze1) targeted at unstable.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
ide the URL of image you tested?
The latest one does it as well, also the non-gtk version
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20110306-00:20/netboot/gtk/mini.iso
FYI, I created the VirtualBox machine with the default for Debian. I get
as far as the boot menu, but if I press enter on 'I
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > - anything I missed?
>
> netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
> working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
> supplied patch for NM's ifblack
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:03:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584973: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.74+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584973,
regarding installer squeeze does not support Cherry USB keyboards
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:03:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558036: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.74+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #558036,
regarding mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di doesn't include sdhci-pci.ko
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> - anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268.
The NM bug is RC but had no i
/grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1_amd64.udeb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1_amd64.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host f
/kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_all.deb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_amd64.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.deb
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1.dsc
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSU
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
...
> That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release
> 2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes.
It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on
26th and need to travel for it on 24th or 25th.
--
Ot
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 18:48, Thibaut Girka wrote:
> Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 à 18:23 +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> Don't you want to maintain it under d-i/something.git on alioth? :)
>
> Why not, although it could really be used outside of d-i or even Debian,
> and we still have to figure out
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:26, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I tried the latest image and a few before that, but neither would boot
> from a usb stick (cat mini.iso > /dev/sdb) or in VirtualBox.
Strange. Can you provide the URL of image you tested?
> The latest testing business card image worked fine t
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
> stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
>
> grub-installer
Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in
unstable
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Samstag, 5. März 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> > I think it should be used, but IMO it should become cdn.debian._org_
>> > first, at least for stable. For sid and testing it's ok without
>> > debian.org but a stable install should
It works!
I simply removed the "quiet" option, and I encountered no other problem
during the installation process.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian
34 matches
Mail list logo
