[William Belanger]
> Is the password blanked out to prevent someone printing it out?
Yes. The late_command part is executed in finish-install.d/07preseed,
while the user setup is in finish-install.d/06user-setup, and the
passwords are cleared just after user. To get access to the user
password,
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2010-07-30 19:32]:
> Warning: /etc/fstab parse error; guessing that the root device is /dev/sda2
Please show me what your /etc/fstab looks like.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2010-07-31 10:34]:
> i also note that there is no command in flash-kernel for the guruplug to
> actually write the kernel to NAND storage -- it generates uImage and
> uInitrd, but does not store them to /dev/mtd1 as i'd expect something like:
> nandwrite /dev/mtd1 /boot/uIm
Hi there,
I am new to Linux and have only started using Debian one year ago.I am
not a programmer, only a user.
I have found three little annoyances with Debian 5.0.4/5.0.5 and they
are:
1. Evolution email client: the program seems unable to display more than
three (3) email accounts when check
Hello,
I'm attempting to create a custom install CD using preseeding. I've managed
to get everything to work as expected with one exception.
My preseed/late_command calls a script, which - among other things - creates
a samba user using smbpasswd. The creation of this user requires a username
and
On 0, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just uploaded busybox version 1:1.17.1-2 into unstable (it was
> previously in experimental), which supports Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD.
>
> As already agreed with Otavio, could you please unblock this package?
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
Your message dated Sat, 07 Aug 2010 17:17:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591917: fixed in partman-md 53
has caused the Debian Bug report #591917,
regarding /sbin/mdadm --detail --scan fails in d-i
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
partman-md_53.dsc
to main/p/partman-md/partman-md_53.dsc
partman-md_53.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-md/partman-md_53.tar.gz
partman-md_53_all.udeb
to main/p/partman-md/partman-md_53_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-md_53.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-md_5
partman-md_53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-md_53.dsc
partman-md_53.tar.gz
partman-md_53_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 04:31:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> > > August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> > August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
> > progress to fixing the issue.
>
> I still feel this is an overre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> notforwarded 591917
Bug #591917 [partman-md] /sbin/mdadm --detail --scan fails in d-i
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Hey folks,
As promised earlier (a few weeks back), I've moved the download
location for the daily netinst images that I've been building
including firmware packages. They are deliberately not included
alongside the official main daily builds, as they contain non-free
material. They're now at
ht
Your message dated Sat, 07 Aug 2010 15:04:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#505111: fixed in rescue 1.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #505111,
regarding rescue-mode md auto-assembly could cause data loss
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Accepted:
rescue-check_1.23_all.udeb
to main/r/rescue/rescue-check_1.23_all.udeb
rescue-mode_1.23_all.udeb
to main/r/rescue/rescue-mode_1.23_all.udeb
rescue_1.23.dsc
to main/r/rescue/rescue_1.23.dsc
rescue_1.23.tar.gz
to main/r/rescue/rescue_1.23.tar.gz
Override entries for your packag
Your message dated Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:59:44 +0100
with message-id <20100807145943.ga21...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#591852: libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Clock skew
detected.
has caused the Debian Bug report #591852,
regarding libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Clock skew detected.
to be mark
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 04:31:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> > August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
> > progress to fixing the issue.
>
> I still f
rescue_1.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rescue_1.23.dsc
rescue_1.23.tar.gz
rescue-check_1.23_all.udeb
rescue-mode_1.23_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
> progress to fixing the issue.
I still feel this is an overreaction as only the original reporter has ever
see
The boot.img.gz it is in:
"http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/";
to make bootable pen drives does not work on version testing.
While the process gzip-dc boot.img.gz is created then will not work,
however to the same process but for lenny vesion if it works correctly.
Tha
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Can we PLEASE rename this from "rescue" image to "safe mode" image, and
> document in its boot screen that it should NEVER be used in a system with
> filesystem or RAID problems?
Well, my whole reply came out with a lot more annoyed tone th
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
> and we've now frozen, again.
Yes. And the justifications in the bug report for not fixing the underlying
issues go like this: we should take actions which are guaranteed to destro
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
the hacklab room is the
23 matches
Mail list logo
