Processed: Re: Bug#576309: installation-reports: [pt_BR] A mistake in grub-pc configuration phase

2010-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 576309 Should consider rewording grub-installer templates to abetter > fit 2010 device names Bug #576309 [grub-installer] installation-reports: [pt_BR] A mistake in grub-pc configuration phase Changed Bug title to 'Should consider reword

Processed: reassign 576490 to base-installer

2010-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 576490 base-installer Bug #576490 [initramfs-tools] use lvm name and not UUID for lvm resume partition Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'base-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Bug#576309: installation-reports: [pt_BR] A mistake in grub-pc configuration phase

2010-04-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
retitle 576309 Should consider rewording grub-installer templates to abetter fit 2010 device names thanks > This really will depend upon upstream. > > If English translation gets an update we can then > update the translation. :) Agreed. Retitling the bug as the pt_BR specific iss

Processed: reassign 572858 to initramfs-tools

2010-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 572858 initramfs-tools Bug #572858 [base-installer] use lvm name and not UUID for lvm resume partition Bug reassigned from package 'base-installer' to 'initramfs-tools'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Bug#576309: installation-reports: [pt_BR] A mistake in grub-pc configuration phase

2010-04-04 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03-04-2010 09:35, Eriberto wrote: > 2010/4/3 Christian PERRIER : > >> While I'm OK with s/hda/sdc5, Indeed, it was probably a leftover from a copy-paste. >> I don't agree with other changes: >> >> - the original English talks about "ext

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100403 20:36]: > On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case > > the build-script doesn't return true. > > I think that's fine. If individual build targets fail then the build as a > who

Bug#575751: marked as done ([rootskel-gtk PATCH] Only start X if we're using the GTK frontend.)

2010-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:18:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#575751: fixed in rootskel-gtk 1.19 has caused the Debian Bug report #575751, regarding [rootskel-gtk PATCH] Only start X if we're using the GTK frontend. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-04 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: rootskel-gtk_1.19.dsc to main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.19.dsc rootskel-gtk_1.19.tar.gz to main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.19.tar.gz rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.udeb to main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.udeb Override entries for your package: rootskel-gtk_1.19.dsc

Processing of rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.changes

2010-04-04 Thread Archive Administrator
rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel-gtk_1.19.dsc rootskel-gtk_1.19.tar.gz rootskel-gtk_1.19_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.

Bug#516911: Same behaviour with lenny installer 5.0.4

2010-04-04 Thread Bernhard
Hello, only for information: same behaviour with lenny installer 5.0.4 (the kernel has to be the 686 image instead of the 486 image). Regards Bernhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o

Spam cleaning effort: spam reporters needed for Feb and Mar 2010

2010-04-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
In the effort to keep the debian-boot archives clean of spam (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean), we're currently missing at least one person going through the archives for February 2010 (only 4 have gone through the archives as of now and a given post needs to be reported 5 times to