I would second the suggestion for support of implementing loop-aes, as
this must otherwise be done through other means, thereby increasing the
cost (time, labor) of deploying Debian to secure situations.
You want to get more leads from your web site? Are there extensions to your
pages you know you want to do? Contact me for a free analysis and quote. Email
me back today.
Perry Gregg
Davis, CA & Austin, TX
cell: (510) 684-4152
P.S. Google or Yahoo "Perry Gregg" or "Perry Gregg tennis", we practi
You want to get more leads from your web site? Are there extensions to your
pages you know you want to do? Contact me for a free analysis and quote. Email
me back today.
Perry Gregg
Davis, CA & Austin, TX
cell: (510) 684-4152
P.S. Google or Yahoo "Perry Gregg" or "Perry Gregg tennis", we practi
Thanks for getting amd64 going again so fast.
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As of now, we can't move the armel builds yet (as we are waiting for
> the new debian machines to be setup). I hope to not forget to mention
> it once we have the new machines running.
>
> For i386, I d
* Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org) [100401 19:55]:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > OK. I guess we'll get back to you on that. I'd like to hear what Joey
> > thinks of that as he currently runs two arches, including i386.
>
> I would like to get rid of the dedicated machine I have running for
> the armel build
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I cannot run the installer without graphics. It could be that the
> installer is actually running but does not print anything on the serial
> port but I doubt that is the case because with graphics I have to type
> the name of the image to boot.
Frans Pop wrote:
> OK. I guess we'll get back to you on that. I'd like to hear what Joey
> thinks of that as he currently runs two arches, including i386.
I would like to get rid of the dedicated machine I have running for
the armel builds. Don't really care about the i386 build overhead, but
als
On 04/01/2010 06:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Changing the "-boot d" to "-boot c" gives access to the installed system
with full serial support from the quik bootloader so I don't think this
is the case.
Can you provide the boot log for th
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Changing the "-boot d" to "-boot c" gives access to the installed system
> with full serial support from the quik bootloader so I don't think this
> is the case.
Can you provide the boot log for the installer somehow?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
tag 576206 moreinfo
thanks
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> qemu-system-ppc -m 1024 -net nic -net
> tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=nomg -cdrom
> debian-504-powerpc-netinst.iso -boot d -nographic
>
> does not seem to do anything.
>
> Without -nographic a prompt on yellow
On 04/01/2010 05:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
tag 576206 moreinfo
thanks
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
qemu-system-ppc -m 1024 -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=nomg -cdrom
debian-504-powerpc-netinst.iso -boot d -nographic
Sorry, part of the comman
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 576206 moreinfo
Bug #576206 [debian-installer] debian-installer: [ppc] does not work with
serial console
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
qemu-system-ppc -m 1024 -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=nomg -cdrom
debian-504-powerpc-netinst.iso -boot d -nographic
does not seem to do anything.
Without -nographic a prompt on yellow screen appears where you can type
something to
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 15:08]:
> > On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > If the build-only could also be more verbose (i.e. logging during
> > > build) I'd appreciate that even more.
> >
> > Would it be OK if you hav
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 15:08]:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If the build-only could also be more verbose (i.e. logging during build)
> > I'd appreciate that even more.
>
> Would it be OK if you have to set 'LOG_TO_STDOUT=1' for that in the
> environment
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100331 21:38]:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > The "svn update" inside the chroot fails now - nothing to worry, but
> > > would be nice if that wouldn't happen.
> >
> > Looks like you curre
16 matches
Mail list logo
