Package: mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di
Version: 1.84
Hi! Daily d-i fails to detect SDHC card slot in Acer Aspire One (
04:00.2 SD Host controller [0805]: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host
Controller [197b:2381] (prog-if 01)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
).
M
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> would it be possible for the installer to automatically determine the
> correct UTC setting based on info retrieved from the NTP clock?
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I have always been wondering whether d-i couldn't tr
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:39:41 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 558016 clock-setup
> thanks
>
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > suppose that at the beginning of the installation the user says "yes" to
> > whether they want their clock to be autamically configured with NTP
Frans Pop, le Thu 26 Nov 2009 00:39:41 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > suppose that at the beginning of the installation the user says "yes" to
> > whether they want their clock to be autamically configured with NTP,
> > then (ideally) they should never
reassign 558016 clock-setup
thanks
On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> suppose that at the beginning of the installation the user says "yes" to
> whether they want their clock to be autamically configured with NTP,
> then (ideally) they should never have to worry about the cloc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 558016 clock-setup
Bug #558016 [debian-installer] debian-installer: UTC question is unnecessary
when using NTP
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'clock-setup'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
package: debian-installer
severity: normal
suppose that at the beginning of the installation the user says "yes" to
whether they want their clock to be autamically configured with NTP,
then (ideally) they should never have to worry about the clock ever
again.
however, as the installer finishes up
On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >> * Otavio Salvador [2009-11-23 19:44]:
> >> > #557387 - Graphical installer is brokeness (cjwatson and/or lunar)
> >> > #55663
Hello Frans,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Otavio Salvador [2009-11-23 19:44]:
>> > #557387 - Graphical installer is brokeness (cjwatson and/or lunar)
>> > #556635 - udev: blanks inserted RW media (fixed in GIT a
On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2009-11-23 19:44]:
> > #557387 - Graphical installer is brokeness (cjwatson and/or lunar)
> > #556635 - udev: blanks inserted RW media (fixed in GIT already)
>
> A fixed udev has been uploaded in the meantime. Although
Hello Martin,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2009-11-23 19:44]:
>> #557387 - Graphical installer is brokeness (cjwatson and/or lunar)
>> #556635 - udev: blanks inserted RW media (fixed in GIT already)
>
> A fixed udev has been uploaded in the mean
* Christian Perrier [2009-11-25 19:53]:
> I'm somehow not entirely happy with the synopsis not being understable
> all alone (without the long descriptions...and also virtually
> requiring the long description to be read *before* it).
I just copied other templates from partman-ext3 so maybe those
* Otavio Salvador [2009-11-23 19:44]:
> #557387 - Graphical installer is brokeness (cjwatson and/or lunar)
> #556635 - udev: blanks inserted RW media (fixed in GIT already)
A fixed udev has been uploaded in the meantime. Although I wonder if
this was a blocker to start with since the udeb in t
Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com):
> I think the patch I proposed (below) is fine but we still need a new
> template.
>
> How about the following text:
>
> _Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
> Your boot partition has not been marked as a bootable partition, even
Your message dated Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:45:47 +
with message-id <20091125184547.ga3...@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line No longer supported
has caused the Debian Bug report #404950,
regarding [mips] Disk is advertised as partition on SWARM (Broadcom BCM91250a)
to be marked as done.
This
I think the patch I proposed (below) is fine but we still need a new
template.
How about the following text:
_Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
Your boot partition has not been marked as a bootable partition, even
though this is required by your machine in order to boot
I suggested putting the following patch into d-i just before the
release of lenny but never got an ack/nack. Since this issue is
still there, I'm thinking of putting the patch in now. Can some
partman experts comment on it?
* Martin Michlmayr [2009-01-06 16:56]:
> We have a partman check that e
17 matches
Mail list logo
