On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Lee Winter (lee.j.i.win...@gmail.com):
>
>> I did the most recent three months of 2009, but the density was pretty low.
>
> I haven't checked the wiki and I'm not online right now, but please
> take care to register this in the pa
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> The existing templates for the four main questions in localechooser all
> have problems: they cause Lintian warnings and don't really help the
> user with what he's doing.
Thanks for working on this. It was on my TODO list for a while as I
found quite stran
Quoting Lee Winter (lee.j.i.win...@gmail.com):
> I did the most recent three months of 2009, but the density was pretty low.
I haven't checked the wiki and I'm not online right now, but please
take care to register this in the page.
>
> > Old archives are also missing reviews, particularly a f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 553678 localechooser
Bug #553678 [locales] locales: Language soup in Nowegian locale
Bug reassigned from package 'locales' to 'localechooser'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.7-18.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> As one can see on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean,
> this effort initiated by Frans back in April is lagging.
>
> Last 3 months of debian-boot archives have been reviewed by 3 persons
> only (Frans, Giacomo Catenazzi and
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:21:34AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > It has been deemed "too buggy to be in Debian" by the ftp team, who don't
>> > have the authority to make such determinations on their own.
>
>> Doesn't the ftp team have aut
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:21:34AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > It has been deemed "too buggy to be in Debian" by the ftp team, who don't
> > have the authority to make such determinations on their own.
> Doesn't the ftp team have authority over determining what goes
> into the arch
Your message dated Mon, 2 Nov 2009 00:16:27 +0100
with message-id <200911020016.28413.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#552067: Install process "forgets" the CD if left
alone for long time
has caused the Debian Bug report #552067,
regarding Install process "forgets" the CD if left alon
I am using a Dell D630, nvidia graphics, and am having the same problem. I
am using the oct 29 build.
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> I've just tried building netcfg on s390, but that fails with:
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 's390' does not
> appear in package's architecture list (i386 sparc alpha m68k arm
> armel armeb powerpc mips mipsel hppa ia
The existing templates for the four main questions in localechooser all
have problems: they cause Lintian warnings and don't really help the
user with what he's doing.
Below a proposed patch to improve them. The patch also includes the changes
needed because of #552560 ("locale selection incomplet
I may have a clue.
After the 1st reboot, the keyboard is in qwerty whereas I submit my
password in azerty during install... Very annoying, still in Lenny.
The keyboard is in US in both gdm and Gnome.
I suspect HAL to not have rules to follow the keyboard map used during
installand use an US keyboa
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 552576 important
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:15:01AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> A missing standards version is a violation of a Should directive in
>> policy, and normally would be filed as important.
>
>> Filed as serious, s
As one can see on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean,
this effort initiated by Frans back in April is lagging.
Last 3 months of debian-boot archives have been reviewed by 3 persons
only (Frans, Giacomo Catenazzi and me) and are thus missing at least
two more people to review them so
# was fixed before bug was filled;
# so wasn't marked pending automatically
tag 552576 pending
thanks
gosh.. why do you guys waste so much time for something that has already
been fixed in svn anyway... (even before the first bug was filled)
nevermind, i guess i don't have to understand that.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # was fixed before bug was filled;
> # so wasn't marked pending automatically
> tag 552576 pending
Bug #552576 [live-installer] live-installer: should have a Standards-Version
field
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 552576 important
Bug #552576 [live-installer] live-installer: should have a Standards-Version
field
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
severity 552576 important
thanks
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:15:01AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> A missing standards version is a violation of a Should directive in
> policy, and normally would be filed as important.
> Filed as serious, since a package with these files will currently get
> th
Package: live-installer
Version: 13
Severity: serious
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: no-standards-version-field
The source package does not have a Standards-Version control
field. Please update your package to latest Policy and set this
control field appropriately.
Refer to Debian Polic
19 matches
Mail list logo
