Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2009 07:49:28 +0200
with message-id <20090908054928.gf29...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#545508: installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #545508,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2009 07:50:24 +0200
with message-id <20090908055024.gg29...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#545539: installation-reports: A successful
installation.
has caused the Debian Bug report #545539,
regarding installation-reports: A successful installatio
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
> > [1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
> > images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the
> > "docs" and "tools" directories :-)
>
> Would you please describe what is left that the new version of
> debm
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
This is a bit tedious, just to report a successful installation!
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian-502a-i386-CD-1.iso
Date: 7th September, 2009 at about 20:00 hours
Machine: HP Omnibook 4150 B
Partitions:
Base Sy
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
...
> ... debmirror[1] ...
...
> [1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD images
>using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the "docs" and
>"tools" directories :-)
Would you please describe what is left
The (nearly) bi-monthly D-I team meeting happened today at 20:00UTC.
As usual, the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Monday 07 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Have you made some progress here? During the team meeting today, there
> is a rough consensus that we should move on but all of us agreed that
> you could have interesting comments and, even if they aren't as
> polished as you would like to, i
tag 509723 patch
quit
Hi,
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 07:56:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Changes:
> busybox (1:1.13.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release.
> - Unbreak compressed usage. (closes: #521443)
>* [deb, udeb] Enable udhpc. (closes: #504089)
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 509723 patch
Bug #509723 [preseed] Support TFTP preseed fetch method
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
> > plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
> > package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
> > packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate
Your message dated Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:38:20 +0200
with message-id <20090907203820.gr29...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug fixed in last upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #532842,
regarding Debconf translations do not carry proper copyright
to be marked as done.
This means th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 536353 etch
Bug #536353 [debian-installer] debian-installer: [s390,etch] gpgv: Can't check
signature: public key not found
Added tag(s) etch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
2009/9/7 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko :
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
>> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
>> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to lo
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
The correct machine ID is probably PowerBook3,3.
Risto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
317...@bugs.debian.org
Committed to a Bright Future?
Stop Wishing and Start Doing
Pick up the Phone and ring 8774073076
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:37:48 -0700
2009
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-502a-i386-netinst.iso from debian.org
Date: 2009-09-07 02:51:00
Machine: Dell Inspiron 9300 (Laptop)
Processor: Pentium M, 1.86GHz
Memory: 1GB
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/s
247...@bugs.debian.org
Committed to a Bright Future?
Stop Wishing and Start Doing
Pick up the Phone and ring 8774073076
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:29:16 -0900
2009
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Just for the record, I'm including here people from debian-boot, so that
this extra piece of information gets somehow included in future versions
of d-i (if it is not incorporated already).
On Sep 07 2009, sergio sevillano wrote:
> Rogério Brito escribió:
> >See if it works and reportback. If that
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:02:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#491376: fixed in partman-auto 89
has caused the Debian Bug report #491376,
regarding recipe for BIOS-based boot on gpt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Accepted:
partman-auto_89.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_89.dsc
partman-auto_89.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_89.tar.gz
partman-auto_89_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_89_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_89.dsc - s
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 13:30 +0200 schrieb Vincent Danjean:
> Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:03:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >
> >> Robert filed already after the upload of grub-legacy a RC bug so it
> >> doestn't migrate after the usual 10 days to testing.
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
partman-auto_89_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_89.dsc
partman-auto_89.tar.gz
partman-auto_89_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.d
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_71.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_71.dsc
partman-partitioning_71.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_71.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_71_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_7
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:11:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#511518: fixed in os-prober 1.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #511518,
regarding os-prober: probes extended and swap partitions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:03:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
>> Robert filed already after the upload of grub-legacy a RC bug so it
>> doestn't migrate after the usual 10 days to testing.
>>
>> Note that we only Suggests: os-prober and not Recommend: it like Ubuntu
>> doe
2009/9/7 Colin Watson :
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > The level of functionality provided by the existing filesystem modules
>> > would be quite sufficient.
>>
>> Oh I see, you mean the other way around, using th
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:11:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#476184: fixed in os-prober 1.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #476184,
regarding os-prober: Mounted partitions after running update-grub
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.31_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.31_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.31.dsc
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.31.dsc
os-prober_1.31.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.31.tar.gz
os-prober_1.31_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.31
partman-partitioning_71_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_71.dsc
partman-partitioning_71.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_71_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> >> interface so that it can have read/write support in
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
>> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
>
> I'm actively uninterested in write support; in thi
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> gfxboot-theme-ubuntu needs a small patch (attached) to adjust to the
> renaming of the userland executables.
Thanks, I've applied a similar patch in gfxboot-theme-ubuntu 0.8.4.
> I'll look into creating a gfxboot-theme-debian using
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
I'm actively uninterested in write support; in this case it would do
much more harm than good.
> Of course,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
>
os-prober_1.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.31.dsc
os-prober_1.31.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.31_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.31_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
All apologies for the late reply. I've been busy elsewhere.
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Thursday 27 August 2009, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
I'm not sure where to ask, so please redirect me to the appropriate
mailing list if necessary.
I'm currently trying to use pbuilder to package an OCaml binding t
os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
filesystem modules, etc.
Today's crazy idea was to implement a FUSE wrapper for grub-fs
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-502a-i386-netinst.iso from debian.org
Date: 2009-09-07 01:55:00
Machine: Dell Inspiron 9300 (Laptop)
Processor: Pentium M, 1.86GHz
Memory: 1GB
Partitions:
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
Base System Installation Checklist
40 matches
Mail list logo
