Re: wait for the boot device

2009-07-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marco d'Itri [2009.07.19.2309 +0200]: > > Really? So is /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdadm > > (from the mdadm package) wrong, or something else buggy or broken by > > design? I also experienced the need for udevsettle when booting from > > LVM over partitioned multip

Re: please let dhcp3 into testing

2009-07-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > >That seems feasible and sustainable, isn't it? > > There is a webpage [1] tracking it, maybe it should just be used more? That's pulled information (one has to think about visiting the page, etc.). I happen to think that pushed information could be more e

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Luca, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Luca Favatella wrote: > In the past two weeks I focused on getting network configuration > working in debian-installer (d-i), without success. > I skipped the keyboard layout selection, because not a top priority, > and I didn't reach udeb download (and

Bug#536820: please add scratchbox2 variant

2009-07-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Riku, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > Manpage updated. I didn't touch the whitespace issues because I already > try match what is in the files it patch - tabs for debootstrap and functions, > mixed for scripts/sid. [...] Is, it doesn't mean we ought to not avoid addmin

kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-19 Thread Luca Favatella
In the past two weeks I focused on getting network configuration working in debian-installer (d-i), without success. I skipped the keyboard layout selection, because not a top priority, and I didn't reach udeb download (and installation). I focused on network configuration in d-i, mostly done by

Bug#387696: marked as done (mdcfg: MD stands for "multiple device", not "multidisk")

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#387696: fixed in partman-md 46 has caused the Debian Bug report #387696, regarding mdcfg: MD stands for "multiple device", not "multidisk" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#499285: marked as done (partman-md: should use partman locking mechanism)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#499285: fixed in partman-md 46 has caused the Debian Bug report #499285, regarding partman-md: should use partman locking mechanism to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

partman-md_46_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: partman-md_46.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46.dsc partman-md_46.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46.tar.gz partman-md_46_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46_all.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-md_46.dsc - source debian-installer

Re: wait for the boot device

2009-07-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > If you need udevsettle anywhere else than after running udevtrigger then > > something is either buggy or broken by design. > Really? So is /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdadm > (from the mdadm package) wrong, or something else buggy or broken b

Re: wait for the boot device

2009-07-19 Thread Ferenc Wagner
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Now that a kernel (and initramfs-tools) maintainer gave the >> explanation you requested, how do you think we could proceed with >> this? > > As I explained, I will consider this after I will have finished the next > uplo

Bug#536820: please add scratchbox2 variant

2009-07-19 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:32:54PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Argh, please forget the previous patch. That one was certainly not the > > one I wanted to send. The patch attached to this mail has the advantage > > of actually working. > P

Processing of partman-md_46_i386.changes

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-md_46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-md_46.dsc partman-md_46.tar.gz partman-md_46_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: wait for the boot device

2009-07-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Now that a kernel (and initramfs-tools) maintainer gave the > explanation you requested, how do you think we could proceed with > this? As I explained, I will consider this after I will have finished the next upload. > I'd like to add that udevsettle calls are a

Bug#533384: marked as done (do not add ff02::3 to /etc/hosts)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:17:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#533384: fixed in netcfg 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #533384, regarding do not add ff02::3 to /etc/hosts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Re: Switch to udhcpc in netcfg

2009-07-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello all, On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > To test the udhcpc usage you can build an installer image with the > modified udebs and do, at console: > > #: rm -rf /var/lib/dhcp3 /sbin/dhclient* To make it easier to test I've pushed the netcfg changes and also uploaded netc

netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb netcfg_1.50.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50.dsc netcfg_1.50.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50.tar.gz netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb Override entri

Processing of netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.50.dsc netcfg_1.50.tar.gz netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Processing of netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: netcfg_1.50.dsc netcfg_1.50.tar.gz netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia

Processed: Re: Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath, yaboot.conf)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 515249 installation-guide-powerpc Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath, yaboot.conf) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-guide-powerpc'. > End of message, stoppi

Processed: Re: Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath, yaboot.conf)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 515249 normal Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath, yaboot.conf) Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > clone 515249 -1 Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, mult

Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath, yaboot.conf)

2009-07-19 Thread Max Vozeler
severity 515249 normal clone 515249 -1 retitle -1 manual: Mention console=hvc0 for ppc? reassign -1 installation-guide thanks On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:49:36AM +, Paul McEnery wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > Initial boot: Maybe not soe much an error, I had to specify the > cons

Bug#520697: marked as done (installation-reports: xterm not work without I command metacity gnome-panel and nautilus)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:59:04 +0200 with message-id <20090719155903.ga30...@dp.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#520697: installation-reports: xterm not work without I command metacity gnome-panel and nautilus has caused the Debian Bug report #520697, regarding installation-reports: xt

Bug#536439: marked as done (installation-reports: Postgresql package problem after clean install of Lenny-Netinst.)

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:20:56 +0200 with message-id <20090719152055.ga29...@dp.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#536439: installation-reports: Postgresql package problem after clean install of Lenny-Netinst. has caused the Debian Bug report #536439, regarding installation-reports: Post

Re: please let dhcp3 into testing

2009-07-19 Thread Luk Claes
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): Cyril Brulebois wrote: Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009): I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security fix for CVE-2009-0692 You're s

Processed: Re: Bug#534248: debian-installer: File system creation failed

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 534248 parted Bug#534248: debian-installer: File system creation failed Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `parted'. > found 534248 1.8.8.git.2009.06.03-1 Bug#534248: debian-installer: File system creation failed Bug marke

Re: wait for the boot device

2009-07-19 Thread Ferenc Wagner
maximilian attems writes: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:55:40PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >> On Jun 25, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> Any word on this? >> >> I'd like to get an explanation from the kernel maintainers about why >> this would be needed (and it would be needed in my package). > >

Re: please let dhcp3 into testing

2009-07-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009): > >>I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that > >>necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security > >>fix for CVE-2009-0692 > > > >You're supposed

Processed: block 328498 with 537535, block 328498 with 537536

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 328498 with 537535 Bug#537535: other missing utilities for debconf replacement Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734 331735 331736 331737 331738 331739 33174

Processed: forcibly merging 469363 537522

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 469363 537522 Bug#469363: dpkg-reconfigure should run prerm upgrade Bug#537522: dpkg-reconfigure does not run prerm, postinst Forcibly Merged 469363 537522. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#537536: missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc

2009-07-19 Thread Joey Hess
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.146 Severity: normal perl debconf, in the "frontend" program, has complicated probing that figures out the package whose postinst script is being run, and loads the corresponding templates file and runs the corresponding config script first. (Etc.) cdebconf is missin

Bug#537535: other missing utilities for debconf replacement

2009-07-19 Thread Joey Hess
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.146 Severity: normal In order to replace perl debconf, the following utilities are also probably needed in cdebconf: * debconf-set-selections (preseed has a shell version of this, just needs some minor breaking out and the ability to read stdin if no file is speci

flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb flash-kernel_2.20.dsc to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.20.dsc flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.20_armel.de

Processed: setting package to cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * dpkg-reconfigure: Don't treat config script exit 1 as success. > #Closes: #443760 > # * dpkg-reconfigure: Run prerm script to simulate package reinstallation. > #Closes: #469363 > # > p

Processing of flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes

2009-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_2.20.dsc flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot

Re: partman-md/mdcfg merge

2009-07-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:52:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Colin Watson [2009.07.17.2209 +0200]: > > It looks as if this is too difficult for people to test without it > > being in the archive, so in the absence of objections I've gone > > ahead and committed this. Let's see ho

Processed: setting package to cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291 > # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix -p to set priority. Closes: #442288 > # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix skipping of seen questions. Closes: #442290 > # >

Processed: setting package to cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291 > # > package cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf > cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclien

Processed: setting package to cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291 > # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix -p to set priority. Closes: #442288 > # > package cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf

Processed: block 328498 with 443760, block 328498 with 469363

2009-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 328498 with 443760 Bug#443760: dpkg-reconfigure does not detect config script exiting nonzero Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734 331735 331736 331737 3317

Bug#537523: passthrough frontend and debconf-apt-progress needed to replace perl debconf

2009-07-19 Thread Joey Hess
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.146 Severity: normal In order to fully replace perl debconf, cdebconf needs to have an implementation of debconf-apt-progress and the passthrough frontend. This doesn't really block the perl debconf replacement bug, because it would be possible to use cdebconf as a d

Bug#212881: not a blocker

2009-07-19 Thread Joey Hess
unblock 328498 with 212881 retitle 212881 alternative noninteractive (but visible) frontend tag 212881 patch thanks cdebconf already treats "noninteractive" the same as "none" when selecting a frontend, which is I think close enough to perl debconf's behavior that this bug is not a blocker for cde

Bug#537522: dpkg-reconfigure does not run prerm, postinst

2009-07-19 Thread Joey Hess
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.146 Severity: normal Perl dpkg-reconfigure runs the prerm upgrade and the postinst configure, so as to simulate a page upgrade and cause the reconfiguration to take effect. cdebconf is missing this. Also, perl dpkg-reconfigure has a nasty hack to detect prerm/postinst