also sprach Marco d'Itri [2009.07.19.2309 +0200]:
> > Really? So is /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdadm
> > (from the mdadm package) wrong, or something else buggy or broken by
> > design? I also experienced the need for udevsettle when booting from
> > LVM over partitioned multip
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
> >That seems feasible and sustainable, isn't it?
>
> There is a webpage [1] tracking it, maybe it should just be used more?
That's pulled information (one has to think about visiting the page,
etc.).
I happen to think that pushed information could be more e
Hello Luca,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> In the past two weeks I focused on getting network configuration
> working in debian-installer (d-i), without success.
> I skipped the keyboard layout selection, because not a top priority,
> and I didn't reach udeb download (and
Hello Riku,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Manpage updated. I didn't touch the whitespace issues because I already
> try match what is in the files it patch - tabs for debootstrap and functions,
> mixed for scripts/sid.
[...]
Is, it doesn't mean we ought to not avoid addmin
In the past two weeks I focused on getting network configuration
working in debian-installer (d-i), without success.
I skipped the keyboard layout selection, because not a top priority,
and I didn't reach udeb download (and installation).
I focused on network configuration in d-i, mostly done by
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:34:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#387696: fixed in partman-md 46
has caused the Debian Bug report #387696,
regarding mdcfg: MD stands for "multiple device", not "multidisk"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:34:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#499285: fixed in partman-md 46
has caused the Debian Bug report #499285,
regarding partman-md: should use partman locking mechanism
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Accepted:
partman-md_46.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46.dsc
partman-md_46.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46.tar.gz
partman-md_46_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_46_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-md_46.dsc - source debian-installer
On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > If you need udevsettle anywhere else than after running udevtrigger then
> > something is either buggy or broken by design.
> Really? So is /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdadm
> (from the mdadm package) wrong, or something else buggy or broken b
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Now that a kernel (and initramfs-tools) maintainer gave the
>> explanation you requested, how do you think we could proceed with
>> this?
>
> As I explained, I will consider this after I will have finished the next
> uplo
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:32:54PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Argh, please forget the previous patch. That one was certainly not the
> > one I wanted to send. The patch attached to this mail has the advantage
> > of actually working.
> P
partman-md_46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-md_46.dsc
partman-md_46.tar.gz
partman-md_46_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Jul 19, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Now that a kernel (and initramfs-tools) maintainer gave the
> explanation you requested, how do you think we could proceed with
> this?
As I explained, I will consider this after I will have finished the next
upload.
> I'd like to add that udevsettle calls are a
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:17:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#533384: fixed in netcfg 1.50
has caused the Debian Bug report #533384,
regarding do not add ff02::3 to /etc/hosts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hello all,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> To test the udhcpc usage you can build an installer image with the
> modified udebs and do, at console:
>
> #: rm -rf /var/lib/dhcp3 /sbin/dhclient*
To make it easier to test I've pushed the netcfg changes and also
uploaded netc
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb
netcfg_1.50.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50.dsc
netcfg_1.50.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50.tar.gz
netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb
Override entri
netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.50.dsc
netcfg_1.50.tar.gz
netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
netcfg_1.50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
netcfg_1.50.dsc
netcfg_1.50.tar.gz
netcfg_1.50_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.50_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 515249 installation-guide-powerpc
Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath,
yaboot.conf)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
`installation-guide-powerpc'.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 515249 normal
Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, multipath,
yaboot.conf)
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> clone 515249 -1
Bug#515249: installation-reports: Various issues on IBM Power5 (lvm, mult
severity 515249 normal
clone 515249 -1
retitle -1 manual: Mention console=hvc0 for ppc?
reassign -1 installation-guide
thanks
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:49:36AM +, Paul McEnery wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> Initial boot: Maybe not soe much an error, I had to specify the
> cons
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:59:04 +0200
with message-id <20090719155903.ga30...@dp.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#520697: installation-reports: xterm not work without I
command metacity gnome-panel and nautilus
has caused the Debian Bug report #520697,
regarding installation-reports: xt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:20:56 +0200
with message-id <20090719152055.ga29...@dp.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#536439: installation-reports: Postgresql package
problem after clean install of Lenny-Netinst.
has caused the Debian Bug report #536439,
regarding installation-reports: Post
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009):
I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
fix for CVE-2009-0692
You're s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 534248 parted
Bug#534248: debian-installer: File system creation failed
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `parted'.
> found 534248 1.8.8.git.2009.06.03-1
Bug#534248: debian-installer: File system creation failed
Bug marke
maximilian attems writes:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:55:40PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> On Jun 25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Any word on this?
>>
>> I'd like to get an explanation from the kernel maintainers about why
>> this would be needed (and it would be needed in my package).
>
>
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009):
> >>I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
> >>necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
> >>fix for CVE-2009-0692
> >
> >You're supposed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 328498 with 537535
Bug#537535: other missing utilities for debconf replacement
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734
331735 331736 331737 331738 331739 33174
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 469363 537522
Bug#469363: dpkg-reconfigure should run prerm upgrade
Bug#537522: dpkg-reconfigure does not run prerm, postinst
Forcibly Merged 469363 537522.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.146
Severity: normal
perl debconf, in the "frontend" program, has complicated
probing that figures out the package whose postinst
script is being run, and loads the corresponding templates
file and runs the corresponding config script first. (Etc.)
cdebconf is missin
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.146
Severity: normal
In order to replace perl debconf, the following utilities
are also probably needed in cdebconf:
* debconf-set-selections (preseed has a shell version of this,
just needs some minor breaking out and the ability to read
stdin if no file is speci
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.20.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.20.dsc
flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * dpkg-reconfigure: Don't treat config script exit 1 as success.
> #Closes: #443760
> # * dpkg-reconfigure: Run prerm script to simulate package reinstallation.
> #Closes: #469363
> #
> p
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.20.dsc
flash-kernel_2.20.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.20_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.20_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:52:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Watson [2009.07.17.2209 +0200]:
> > It looks as if this is too difficult for people to test without it
> > being in the archive, so in the absence of objections I've gone
> > ahead and committed this. Let's see ho
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291
> # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix -p to set priority. Closes: #442288
> # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix skipping of seen questions. Closes: #442290
> #
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291
> #
> package cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf
> cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-gtk cdebconf-newt-udeb libdebconfclien
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #cdebconf (0.146) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Remove newt screen clearing code. Closes: #442291
> # * dpkg-reconfigure: Fix -p to set priority. Closes: #442288
> #
> package cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 328498 with 443760
Bug#443760: dpkg-reconfigure does not detect config script exiting nonzero
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734
331735 331736 331737 3317
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.146
Severity: normal
In order to fully replace perl debconf, cdebconf needs to have
an implementation of debconf-apt-progress and the passthrough
frontend.
This doesn't really block the perl debconf replacement bug,
because it would be possible to use cdebconf as a d
unblock 328498 with 212881
retitle 212881 alternative noninteractive (but visible) frontend
tag 212881 patch
thanks
cdebconf already treats "noninteractive" the same as "none"
when selecting a frontend, which is I think close enough to
perl debconf's behavior that this bug is not a blocker
for cde
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.146
Severity: normal
Perl dpkg-reconfigure runs the prerm upgrade and the postinst
configure, so as to simulate a page upgrade and cause the
reconfiguration to take effect. cdebconf is missing this.
Also, perl dpkg-reconfigure has a nasty hack to detect
prerm/postinst
42 matches
Mail list logo