On Sun, 24 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs:
> - Intel i486,
There is new hardware sold today that is (only) compatible to the 486 SX
instruction set. But it runs at 300 MHz. So it would be a pity to loose
support for such hardwar
Hello Bastian,
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compile
On 2009-05-24, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
IMHO you got to explain why you want to mak
I demand that Bastian Blank may or may not have written...
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose a
> change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
WRT squeeze, pre- or
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
>
>
Hi folks
I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs:
- Intel
Hi folks
I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the s390 port to
z900. At the same time the 31-bit kernel (-s390) will be retired because
it lacks upstream maintenance.
This means that Debian will get unusable on the old 31-bit-only CPUs (G5
and G6), as used for example in the Mult
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.26_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.26_all.udeb
user-setup_1.26.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.26.dsc
user-setup_1.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.26.tar.gz
user-setup_1.26_all.deb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-s
As we're getting closer and closer of switching the console setup
packages from kbd-config to console-setup, I included console-setup in
the "level 1" PO files for Debian Installer, as of today.
Existing translations (19 at the moment I did this) have been merged
into the sublevel 1-3 files. It me
user-setup_1.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.26.dsc
user-setup_1.26.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.26_all.udeb
user-setup_1.26_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> > That's not what I call KISS. Main problem is that in ~2 years time
> > someone will have to untangle what exactly is legacy and what is not.
>
> Yes, your version is easier to cleanup after squeeze goes out.
>
> Please go ahead and commit it
user-setup_1.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.26.dsc
user-setup_1.26.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.26_all.udeb
user-setup_1.26_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
> The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
> unblock them?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Dear all,
I just started looking for ext4 support in bootloaders, I found out
that LILO and GRUB2 support the file system. GRUB support was added on
ubuntu [1] but on ubuntu forums I found out that people is having
problems. I'm going to search documentation about other bootloaders and
I'll
<>
<>
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 22:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > I intend to do the following changes to linux-2.6:
> > > * Change i386/686(-bigmem) to include generic op
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a
> > > bit, that should be possible.
> >
> > We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep
<>
<>
2009/5/23 Bastian Blank :
>
> Some of this changes affects D-I.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> I intend to do the following changes to linux-2.6:
>> * Remove i386/486.
Some VIA mini-ITX boards only work with the i486 flavor, last I checked.
I have such one in
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a
> > bit, that should be possible.
>
> We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep this up it
> looks that in 4 or 5 weeks we can hav
22 matches
Mail list logo
