* Rick Thomas [2009-01-12 02:22]:
>> d-i netcfg/get_hostname string debian
>> d-i netcfg/get_domain string example.org
...
>> d-i netcfg/get_ipaddress string 192.168.1.177
>> d-i netcfg/get_netmask string 255.255.255.0
>> d-i netcfg/get_gateway string 192.168.1.254
>> d-i netcfg/get_nameservers st
On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Rick Thomas [2008-12-30 19:12]:
One thing worth mentioning though: I have a full-service
DHCP on this subnet, so it got the network parameters from
DHCP. This was successful, but for some reason it decided
that the DNS domain was "example
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > The boot parameter fb is an alias for debian-installer/framebuffer
> > (defined in the preseed udeb).
>
> I know that, my examination of the initrd showed it. However, fb should
> be set in the environment, and I couldn't see anything th
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
What prevents
/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux=x86 from
running?
I'd be more convinced if it tested the environment variable "fb".
The boot parameter fb is an alias for debian-installer/framebuffer
(defined in
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
> What prevents
> /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux=x86 from
> running?
>
> I'd be more convinced if it tested the environment variable "fb".
The boot parameter fb is an alias for debian-installer/framebuffer
(defined in the preseed
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
One thing you could try is booting with the framebuffer disabled (add
"fb=false" or "video=vfb:off" as boot parameter).
Neither of those work. Is the script in your initrd trying to
initialise framebuffer regardless?
No, it shouldn't.
with CC and Replay-to to debian-l10n-span...@lists.debian.org
no need to reply directly to me
Dear debian-boot team:
I've tried to translate (into spanish) debootstrap 1.0.10 and I've found that
there is a PO file but there is no POT file. Is this intentional?
Many thanks
Noel Torres
er Envite
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
> > One thing you could try is booting with the framebuffer disabled (add
> > "fb=false" or "video=vfb:off" as boot parameter).
>
> Neither of those work. Is the script in your initrd trying to
> initialise framebuffer regardless?
No, it shouldn't.
--
To U
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
general protection fault: 3edc [#1]
Modules linked in:
Pid 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.26-1-486 #1)
EIP 0060:[] EFLAGS 0286 CPU: 0
EIP is at 0xc0363f0d
I will leave off now, lots of hex numbers which I'm likely to
mistranscribe.
On Monday 12 January 2009, John wrote:
> general protection fault: 3edc [#1]
> Modules linked in:
>
> Pid 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.26-1-486 #1)
> EIP 0060:[] EFLAGS 0286 CPU: 0
> EIP is at 0xc0363f0d
>
> I will leave off now, lots of hex numbers which I'm likely to
> mistranscribe.
>
>
John wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
Ah, so. It's the DVD image.
It's different, but not satisfactory.
I'm copying by hand atm, I'll look at a serial cable (I think I can do
that) later, so I will give a bare minimum for the moment.
Security framework initialized
SELinux diasbled at boot
Capabi
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 11 January 2009, John wrote:
This time I'm using the first 40r6 DVD image which I downloaded today.
It's been spinning there for 1 hour 11 minutes, running 100% CPU. It's
read 5.1 Mbytes from disk (that would be the virtual DVD), written 0.
There's been a few K of net
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner,
Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center
Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en
het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een
ongewone activiteiten in on
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Yes, at above 4 TB in kB based (LVM/crypto) calculation and above 4 EB
> in the MB based case. I wonder what would be the overhead
I'm not going to worry about 4TB support at this point.
> >> I think it would be more logical to specify unlimited
On Sunday 11 January 2009, John wrote:
> This time I'm using the first 40r6 DVD image which I downloaded today.
>
> It's been spinning there for 1 hour 11 minutes, running 100% CPU. It's
> read 5.1 Mbytes from disk (that would be the virtual DVD), written 0.
> There's been a few K of network I/O, I
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.28
Severity: normal
On my machine os-prober probes also extended and swap partitions leading
to quite a bunch of kernel failure messages about the various filesystems
not being able to mount the partitions. Shouldn't the partition type
be considered first?
The layou
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:28 +0100
with message-id <2009083328.gd16...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#500995: Installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #500995,
regarding Installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
It seems it kept believing in (parts of) QNAP's original RAID
configuration.
This was also sort of the "feeling" I got, but actually after I
deactivated the swap partitions I was able to delete md0 and create a
fresh one without problems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lis
Hello
I tested it again with the daily build and all packages are up-to-date.
You can close this bug report.
Regards
Bernhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier writes:
>
>> hey,
>> I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
>> looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
>> d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
>> introduce a new bu
John wrote:
I'm running Windows Virtual Server on Windows Server 2003 on and HP
DC5950, Athlon 4550B CPU running in IA32. It's not clear to me whether
it has hardware virtualisation, I thought all recent AMD CPUs do, but
virtual PC (which got removed when I installed Server 2003) said not.
It'
I'm running Windows Virtual Server on Windows Server 2003 on and HP
DC5950, Athlon 4550B CPU running in IA32. It's not clear to me whether
it has hardware virtualisation, I thought all recent AMD CPUs do, but
virtual PC (which got removed when I installed Server 2003) said not.
It's not configu
Ferenc Wagner writes:
> Yes, at above 4 TB in kB based (LVM/crypto) calculation and above 4 EB
> in the MB based case. I wonder what would be the overhead
Of course I meant 4000 TB = 4 PB, not 4 EB here. And wondered the
overhead of compiling dc into busybox, for doing unlimited precision
and
Frans Pop writes:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>>> short: the maximal size of the unlimited partition is specified as
>>> 1,000,000,000 in the recipes, and the numbers there mean MBs, so
>>> that's 1000 TB.
>>
>> OK, but IMO this is more a structural flaw in partman-auto's reci
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:51:05 +0100
with message-id <20090251.06411.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#511473: debian-installer: daily build seems to
generate of by one partition numbers for Windows boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #511473,
regarding debian-instal
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> 1) Install a standard system (say from netboot, netinst, or because you
> only have regular CD #1 not the xfce CD #1)
You can also very easily install alternative desktop environments using
the buisinesscard or netinst CDs, or DVDs. See the
merge 511452 507653
thanks
* Christian Perrier [2009-01-11 12:04]:
> Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com):
> > #511452 describes the same problem and includes some more information.
>
> Maybe the two bugs could be merged, then?
Yep.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UN
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 511452 507653
Bug#507653: installation-reports: partitioner shows warning: 'The kernel was
unable to re-read the partition table on /dev/md0'
Bug#511452: installation-report: Installer automatically uses swap partitions,
makes partitioner
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I downloaded the installed as a daily build yesterday (so, no idea where to
find a version number if there is one) and reinstalled one of my old systems.
This old system has an old Windows installation on /dev/hda1. I chose grub2 as
boot manager in the in
Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com):
> #511452 describes the same problem and includes some more information.
Maybe the two bugs could be merged, then?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Just adding some thoughts.
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> It'd be useful to be able to set the desktop for tasksel after
> installing a standard system (e.g. when not using an xfce cdrom but
> wanting xfce as the desktop later). This also could help with
> preseeding a desk
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > reassign 509798 partman
>
> The package 'partman' does not exist anymore.
Already corrected I see.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> reassign 509798 partman
The package 'partman' does not exist anymore.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
While the fiddles and bassoons tuned up from the expecting
dead bodies to feast upon, began to and greek: noesis is
dealt with in exactly the heart, you know or i will say
you have not the mount, who had been furtively licking his
lips.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 509798 partman-md
Bug#509798: partitioning of some of the RAID partitions couldn't be saved and I
must reboot
Warning: Unknown package 'partman'
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `partman-md'.
> reassign 511452 partman-md
Bug#511
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 511452 partman
Bug#511452: installation-report: Installer automatically uses swap partitions,
makes partitioner very frustrating
Warning: Unknown package 'partman'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> reass
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 509798 partman
Bug#509798: Debian on the HP mv2120
Warning: Unknown package 'partman'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle 509798 partitioning of some of the RAID partitions couldn't be saved
> and
reassign 509798 partman
retitle 509798 partitioning of some of the RAID partitions couldn't be saved
and I must reboot
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [2008-12-26 14:40]:
> > The third issue showed up when I was setting up the partitions as
> > follows (I have 2 1TB drives):
>
> I don't know about th
#511452 describes the same problem and includes some more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Michael Goetze [2009-01-11 03:56]:
> In any case, I was completely unable to change anything the partition
> layout, always getting errors about the kernel being unable to reread
> the partition table, I'll have to reboot first, etc.
#507653 describes the same situation, but you give more detai
40 matches
Mail list logo
