A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I'm changing all bugs still marked as fixed because of an NMU
> # but never closed by the maintainer as closed in the version of
> # the NMU. This will make sure they get properly tracked,
> # closed and eventually archived.
> close 323645 0.05-0.1
B
onf-udeb
Description: Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation)
Package: bogl-bterm-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 0.1.18-2
Provides: editor
Depends: libc-udeb
Description: Ben's Own Graphics Library - graphical terminal
Package: debian-installer
Status: install ok ins
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.61_armel.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.61_armel.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.61_armel.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.61_armel.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:48:44 -0300]:
>
>> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > * Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
>
>> >> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
>
>> > Are all these udeb-only packages?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
> +---+--+
> | Date| What happe |
> +---+
libdebian-installer_0.61_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.61.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.61.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.61_armel.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.61_armel.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.61_armel.udeb
libdebian-in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO it's best to wait until with syncing until all components are
> available for all arches (at least those that are included in D-I
> images) so that an upload of debian-installer itself can follow as soon
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:48:44 -0300]:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
> >> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
> > Are all these udeb-only packages? If they are not, can we get a list
> > divided in two
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Frans Pop [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:34:58 +0200]:
> > On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
> > > aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I can prepare that list if you want.
>
> Isn't that exactly what dato asked for?
I didn't send it yet since he might use the provided information
bellow to educate Britney about it. He could just say:
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I can prepare that list if you want.
Isn't that exactly what dato asked for?
> Those are mixed up. The ones that aren't udeb-only and are maintained
> by debian-boot are available at:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/d-i/trunk/scripts/testing-
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
>
>> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
>
> Are all these udeb-only packages? If they are not, can we get a list
> divided in two groups? (udeb-only vs not-udeb-only).
They are not. I can pr
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
Are all these udeb-only packages? If they are not, can we get a list
divided in two groups? (udeb-only vs not-udeb-only).
TIA,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.co
* Frans Pop [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:34:58 +0200]:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
> > aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it since
> > last migrated version. Obviously if you or anyone
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 06:39:40PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> libdebian-installer segfaults parsing the attached status file.
>
> open("/var/lib/dpkg/status", O_RDONLY) = 7
> fstat64(7, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=12288, ...}) = 0
> mmap2(NULL, 12288, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 7, 0) = 0x40
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Removing version as this was an old latent issue
> notfound 500378 0.60
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.60.
> severity 500378 serious
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Severity set to `seri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 500378 0.60
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Bug marked as found in version 0.60.
> severity 500378 grave
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 500378 serious
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> BTW, it seems this has nothing to do with main-menu or libc6 at all.
> When I make the following (completely random) change, the image also
> works:
Yes, I just found the same. Even just removing the very last newline in
the status file fix
tus: install ok unpacked
Version: 0.136
Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.7-1), cdebconf-udeb
Description: Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation)
Package: bogl-bterm-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 0.1.18-2
Provides: editor
Depends: libc-udeb
Description: Ben's Own Graphics Library - graphical terminal
Package: debian-installer
Status: install ok installed
Version: orion5x-netboot-20080927-09:34
Description: debian installation image
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-27 18:07]:
> BTW, it seems this has nothing to do with main-menu or libc6 at all.
> When I make the following (completely random) change, the image also
> works:
libdebian-installer segfaults parsing my status file.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cy
BTW, it seems this has nothing to do with main-menu or libc6 at all.
When I make the following (completely random) change, the image also
works:
diff -urN i~/var/lib/dpkg/status i/var/lib/dpkg/status
--- i~/var/lib/dpkg/status 2008-09-27 14:42:50.0 +0300
+++ i/var/lib/dpkg/status
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It is currently exactly the same. We'll need to merge the releases of
>> the missing fours uploads only and installer dir when we do the
>> uploads. I don't think it will be difficult to do. I can do t
scription: Shared NIC drivers
Package: zlib1g-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12
Description: compression library - runtime for Debian installer
Package: libdebconfclient0-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 0.136
Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.7-1), cdebconf-udeb
Description: Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation)
Package: bogl-bterm-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 0.1.18-2
Provides: editor
Depends: libc-udeb
Description: Ben's Own Graphics Library - graphical terminal
Package: debian-installer
Status: install ok installed
Version: orion5x-netboot-20080927-09:34
Description: debian installation image
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I unpacked the initrd, made the change and repacked it.
That really is strange.
Can you provide the output of 'grep libc' on that status file?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> It is currently exactly the same. We'll need to merge the releases of
> the missing fours uploads only and installer dir when we do the
> uploads. I don't think it will be difficult to do. I can do the merges
> to the branch.
No, it is not th
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Humm ... it would be interesting to compare the symbols of both
>> libraries to see what differ between them.
>
> What exactly would you want to compare? I personally do not see any point
> in this ap
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
>> aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it since
>> last migrated version.
>
> Would you mind sharing with the re
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
> aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it since
> last migrated version.
Would you mind sharing with the rest of the team which udebs you have
excluded?
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-27 15:44]:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > i.e. replace libc6-udeb with libc6 for main-menu in
> > /var/lib/dpkg/status and the installer starts again.
>
> Change it how? In the main-menu udeb before the image is built, change i
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Humm ... it would be interesting to compare the symbols of both
> libraries to see what differ between them.
What exactly would you want to compare? I personally do not see any point
in this approach to be honest.
signature.asc
Description
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> i.e. replace libc6-udeb with libc6 for main-menu in
> /var/lib/dpkg/status and the installer starts again.
Change it how? In the main-menu udeb before the image is built, change it
in the image before it is booted or change it on the fly la
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
> aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it since
> last migrated version. Obviously if you or anyone disagree with that
> we can discuss it.
Please do NOT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-27 09:10]:
>> Please also remove glantank from testing since its functionality has
>> been merged in another component.
>
> To clarify, the glantank-installe
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The daily image doesn't start (at least on QNAP). You only get the
> cursor and the screen redraws, but you never see any blue window. The
> image from 2008-09-22 worked whereas that from 2008-09-24 (or later)
> fails to start. I reverted all chang
* Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-27 09:10]:
> Please also remove glantank from testing since its functionality has
> been merged in another component.
To clarify, the glantank-installer udeb has to be removed from
testing and glantank/1.9 should be allowed into lenny.
--
Martin Mich
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
Most of people here know my disagreements with Ubuntu in some areas
but I fully agree that installer is really a diffent case here.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RT,
I've reviewed all packages we track and droped the ones I belive
aren't suitable for Lenny release since had many changes on it since
last migrated version. Obviously if you or anyone disagree with that
we can discuss it.
Here goes the firs
Hi thanks for the help and sorry for late reply have being busy with
work and stuff.
Well anyways i tried it and worked just fine. For some reason its
disabling irq19 during installing but havent notice anything bad
because of it.
Kedit doesent seem to work. If iam in as user and type su in conso
The daily image doesn't start (at least on QNAP). You only get the
cursor and the screen redraws, but you never see any blue window. The
image from 2008-09-22 worked whereas that from 2008-09-24 (or later)
fails to start. I reverted all changes to see which one broke the
installer and came up wi
Hi thanks for the help and sorry for late reply have being busy with
work and stuff.
Well anyways i tried it and worked just fine. For some reason its
disabling irq19 during installing but havent notice anything bad
because of it.
Kedit doesent seem to work. If iam in as user and type su in consol
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Hmm, come on. This is really not the way Ubuntu behave with us wrt the
> > installer. We have the incredible luck of the constant commitment of
> > Colin to keep a good link and to do the best for D
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmm, come on. This is really not the way Ubuntu behave with us wrt the
> installer. We have the incredible luck of the constant commitment of
> Colin to keep a good link and to do the best for D-I to benefit from
> develoments made for Ubunt
44 matches
Mail list logo
