Forwarding to correct group.
-- Forwarded message --
From: മഹേഷ് മുകുന്ദന് | Mahesh M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/8/25
Subject: [ssug-kollam] Fwd: VERY IMPORTANT. Please do read.
I had sent this mail to some Debian list, but perhaps a wrong
destination. If anyone has some ide
reassign 496446 cdebconf
forcmerge 496093 496446
thanks
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 03:22:43PM -0400, Van Reuther wrote:
> If I boot a LiveCD and dump all partitions, recreate the disk labels and
> mdadm --zero-superblock then boot using the debian installer I can start
> to create my physical volum
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 496446 cdebconf
Bug#496446: Partition Manager hangs
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports, debian-amd64' to `cdebconf'.
> forcmerge 496093 496446
Unknown command or malformed arguments to com
Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:39:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#449055: cdebconf: display corruption with multiselect
over progress bar
has caused the Debian Bug report #449055,
regarding cdebconf: display corruption after running xresprobe (during
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# base-installer (1.95) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Install filesystem related packages after running the post-install hooks,
#as the formers might be interactive (and thus need locales to be
#transl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> # via tagpending
> #
> # base-installer (1.95) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Install filesystem related packages after running the post-install hooks,
> #as the formers migh
Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492751: fixed in base-installer 1.94
has caused the Debian Bug report #492751,
regarding Lenny beta 2 dies on boot up
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494466: fixed in base-installer 1.94
has caused the Debian Bug report #494466,
regarding [patch, RFC] Allow to select driver inclusion policy for
initramfs-tools
to be marked as done.
This
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-24 21:35]:
> > > +unusable \
> > > + linux-image-2.6-k7 \
> > > + linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7 \
> > >linux-image-2.6-686 \
> > > - linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 \
> > > + linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem \
> > >
Accepted:
base-installer_1.94.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.94.dsc
base-installer_1.94.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.94.tar.gz
base-installer_1.94_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.94_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.94_armel.udeb
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-24 21:35]:
> > +unusable \
> > + linux-image-2.6-k7 \
> > + linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7 \
> >linux-image-2.6-686 \
> > - linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 \
> > + linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem \
> >linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem \
> >linux-image-2.6.18-1-68
Package: installation-reports, debian-amd64
Boot method: CDROM
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/unstable/20080824-1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2008, Aug 23rd. Approx. 2 PM Eastern Daylight Time.
Machine: Intel DX38BT
Processor: Intel Q6600
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Author: tbm
> Date: Sun Aug 24 19:16:06 2008
> New Revision: 55229
> kernel-2.6 \
> - linux-image-2.6-686 \
>linux-image-2.6-486
> usable \
>linux-image-2.6-486 \
> - linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem \
> + linux-image-2.6.18-1-486
> +unusab
base-installer_1.94_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.94.dsc
base-installer_1.94.tar.gz
base-installer_1.94_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.94_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:12:01PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> * linux-2.6: Ready, builds of some slow arches not yet installed.
>> ready now, except for the openvz RC bug
>
> Fixed upstream, will go in with the next update.
Ok.
>>> * linux-latest-2
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:12:01PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > * linux-2.6: Ready, builds of some slow arches not yet installed.
> ready now, except for the openvz RC bug
Fixed upstream, will go in with the next update.
> > * linux-latest-2.6: Ready.
> The vserver packages
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-3, linux-latest-2.6/15,
> linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-3 and linux-modules-contrib/2.6.26-1.
> This is the first round of kernel updates for the Lenny release.
>
> The status is
> * linux-2.6: Ready, builds of some slow arches
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.8_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.8_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_2.8.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.8.dsc
flash-kernel_2.8.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.8.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.8_arm.deb
to pool/m
> I tried to dig the history of the repository in order to figure out why
> snapshot_dev() used "sort" in the first place, but I was not able to
> get any meaningful result. Do anyone have an idea?
The reason for the sort is probably to make the dialog show:
eth0: .
eth1: .
wlan0:
flash-kernel_2.8_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.8.dsc
flash-kernel_2.8.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.8_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.8_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Accepted:
glantank-utils_1.9_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-utils_1.9_arm.deb
glantank_1.9.dsc
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_1.9.dsc
glantank_1.9.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_1.9.tar.gz
Override entries for your package:
glantank-utils_1.9_arm.deb - optional admin
g
* Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-24 14:02]:
> Wouldn't the following be sufficient?
> if (!strcmp(dev->path, "/dev/mtd"))
> In any cases, go ahead… :)
Yes, but I followed the coding "standard" emplyed in other parts of
the file.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UN
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:04:30PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Patch:
>
> Index: find-parts.c
> ===
> --- find-parts.c (revision 55196)
> +++ find-parts.c (working copy)
> @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@
> while ((dev = ped_de
Hi!
I was wondering what was the procedure to adjust lowmem requirements.
I have found the following in
packages/lowmem/debian-installer-startup.d/S15lowmem:
Set level1 to the lowest amount of memory that will support an install
not in lowmem mode. (This is the max memory footprint of the ins
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.7_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.7_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_2.7.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.7.dsc
flash-kernel_2.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.7.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.7_arm.deb
to pool/m
flash-kernel_2.7_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.7.dsc
flash-kernel_2.7.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.7_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.7_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
glantank_1.9_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glantank_1.9.dsc
glantank_1.9.tar.gz
glantank-utils_1.9_arm.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496293: fixed in partconf 1.29
has caused the Debian Bug report #496293,
regarding should skip mtd devices for now
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_1.29_armel.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_1.29_armel.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_1.29_armel.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_1.29_armel.udeb
partconf_1.29.dsc
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_1.29.dsc
partconf_1.29.tar.gz
to
partconf_1.29_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partconf_1.29.dsc
partconf_1.29.tar.gz
partconf-find-partitions_1.29_armel.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_1.29_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Now that dpkg supports triggers, base-installer should install the
> kernel and extra packages at the same time.
>
> As triggers are used by initramfs-tools, this would allow us to only
> build the initrd once, avoiding multiple expensive computation
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.93
Severity: wishlist
Now that dpkg supports triggers, base-installer should install the kernel
and extra packages at the same time.
As triggers are used by initramfs-tools, this would allow us to only
build the initrd once, avoiding multiple expensive computati
Patch:
Index: find-parts.c
===
--- find-parts.c(revision 55196)
+++ find-parts.c(working copy)
@@ -180,6 +180,8 @@
while ((dev = ped_device_get_next(dev)) != NULL) {
if (dev->read_only)
conti
Package: partconf-find-partitions
Version: 1.28
Severity: important
LVM and RAID don't work on the QNAP TS-409 beacuse find-partitions
fails to work because of #487738.
find-partitions should skip /dev/mtd* devices for now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:48:05PM +0300, root wrote:
> I installed Debian lenny successfully using the beta2 installer.
> However the installer didn't support raid10, and I already created
> a raid10 array (using Debian sid from an old HDD), and a raid1 array.
>
> I installed on the raid1, and t
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.35
Severity: normal
I installed Debian lenny successfully using the beta2 installer.
However the installer didn't support raid10, and I already created
a raid10 array (using Debian sid from an old HDD), and a raid1 array.
I installed on the raid1, and th
36 matches
Mail list logo
