The daily builds I'm running on my machine are failing for a few
days. I can't really determine if this is something specific to my
local setup or not, indeed.
BUILDING IMAGE FOR build_netboot
make[2]: `sources.list.udeb' is up to date.
*
* Warning: Building with localudebs.
* Secure apt validat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The main goal would be (from my personal PoV at least) to get more people
> to test releases, maybe emphasizing the need for feedback (in English!)
> on foreign language installs and non-standard architectures
Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>> If so, jusr db_progress STEP 1 <&4 should work just as well and less
>> messily, like in my patch.
>
> Your patch works. Please disregard mine.. many thanks.
Joey, could you please commit it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are other base-install.d hooks that configure things that could
> also be important, and could potentially be overwritten. I found:
>
> console-setup-udeb: /etc/default/console-setup
> rootskel: /etc/udev/rules.d/ files (netwinder only)
>
> There could
Hello
Good Day
My name is sandra i saw your profile today at (nabble.com) and became
intrested
in you,i will also like to know you the more, and i want you
to send an email to my email address, so i can give you my picture for you
to know whom i believe we can move from here to next level
Gaijin, le Thu 19 Jun 2008 13:31:34 -0700, a écrit :
> Personally, I'd like to see a configuration option in the
> installation, like a tasksel option that would reconfigure Debian for
> the visually impared, running through the system and setting up what it
> can.
That is already discussed
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Thu 19 Jun 2008 23:40:38 +0200, a écrit :
> The activation problem is exactly what this thread is about.
BTW, for the long term, I was also thinking about unconditional
preseeding of debconf from any USB stick which is insertd. That would
permit us to have a webpage which a
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# live-installer (6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Run base-install.d hooks after copying in the live system, to avoid
#overwriting any files created by them. Closes: #486182
#
package live-installer
tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> # via tagpending
> #
> # live-installer (6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Run base-install.d hooks after copying in the live system, to avoid
> #overwriting any files create
Attached patch seems to work (mirror works in auto mode), and the small
test suite I added shows it does the right thing in all 4 cases.
Could use some more testing, and my caveats about this being a hacky and
suboptimal approach still apply.
--
see shy jo
From 2e86f33f8439682894441139873cd917ed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 486558 - patch
Bug#486558: installation-reports: strange (null) in URL for tasksel for
automatic install
Tags were: patch pending confirmed
Tags removed: patch
>
End of messag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 486558 patch
Bug#486558: installation-reports: strange (null) in URL for tasksel for
automatic install
Tags were: pending confirmed
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 486892 - patch
Bug#486892: different behavior from debconf when noninteractively asking a
select question with a default not in the select list
Tags were: confirmed
Tags remove
Gaijin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'd like to see a configuration option in the
> installation, like a tasksel option that would reconfigure Debian for
> the visually impared, running through the system and setting up what it
> can. The only problem, beyond writing such a scr
Personally, I'd like to see a configuration option in the
installation, like a tasksel option that would reconfigure Debian for
the visually impared, running through the system and setting up what it
can. The only problem, beyond writing such a script, is accessing it if
you're blind. Wa
Frans Pop wrote:
> Guess this makes the earlier cloned bug to debconf more severe.
Properly fixing it is going to be tricky. Debconf does it by
having a whole class of noninteractive question elements, that are
always created for questions that are not displayed. So it's a simple
matter of having
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> severity 247744 important
Bug#247744: diverges from debconf for select questions that are asked and not
displayed
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> merge 247744 486892
Bu
,
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:40:49PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I want to migrate to newer Parted (finally)
...
Does someone object to the migration?
...
Fine with me.
Cheers,
Hi friends
sure go ahead,
and if it breaks fatresize something will nee
--
FROM Edu VERY URGENT
VERIFY YOUR EDU Mail ACCOUNT NOW
This mail is to inform all our {.EDU} users that we will be upgrading our
site in a couple of days from now. So you as a user of our site you are
required send us your Email account details so as to enable us know if you
are still making us
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:40:49PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I want to migrate to newer Parted (finally) and we've done a lot of
> improvements on it at upstream side and it's been very difficult to
> keep it up to date since our release was really old.
Excellent news and congrats!
> D
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to migrate to newer Parted (finally) and we've done a lot of
> improvements on it at upstream side and it's been very difficult to
> keep it up to date since our release was really old.
>
> I'd like to confirm if there's no problem for rest of D-I team i
Hello,
I want to migrate to newer Parted (finally) and we've done a lot of
improvements on it at upstream side and it's been very difficult to
keep it up to date since our release was really old.
I'd like to confirm if there's no problem for rest of D-I team in
migrating it now and get an ack fro
Joey Hess wrote:
> If so, jusr db_progress STEP 1 <&4 should work just as well and less
> messily, like in my patch.
Your patch works. Please disregard mine.. many thanks.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 486926 + patch
> thanks
>
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the right
> > combination..any ideas?
>
> Got it, hurrah. Updated and tested patch attached.
Huh, it looks like I was at least on the right track with my patch
Chris Lamb wrote:
> That fixes that problem, but now the read command started by "db_progress
> STEP 1" is reading a filename instead of the the STEP value, resulting in
> "Invalid value: ./bin/", and the installation failing.
>
> I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the righ
Sébastien Hinderer, le Thu 19 Jun 2008 17:34:03 +0200, a écrit :
> In case people do not want an unconditional beep, would it be possible
> to configure syslinux so that keeping a well known combination of key
> pressed while booting would make it beep when it's ready to accept
> options.
Unfortun
Best Pharm Service
Quality Narcotic Experts
http://www.ghateunel.com
c animals or plants are preordained for the sake of the breeder? "But if we
give up the principle in one case,...no shadow of reason can be assigned for
the belief that variations, alike in nature and the result of the same ge
Hi,
> It is a bit hard for blind people to know exactly when they can type
> boot options for the installer. It would be helpful that syslinux beeps
> when it is ready to get input. What do people think about it?
It'd be convenient, yes. In case people do not want an unconditional
beep, would i
tags 486926 + patch
thanks
Chris Lamb wrote:
> I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the right
> combination..any ideas?
Got it, hurrah. Updated and tested patch attached.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have created tests for oldsys-preseed on kuropro now.
Patches attached.
-- Per
oldsys-preseed-tests-080619.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
kuroboxpro_dhcp.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
kuroboxpro_static.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Joey Hess wrote:
> > something seems to block the filename output from tar, causing the
> > progress bar to sit at 2% until very near the end - it then shoots up
> > quite quickly.
>
> Right, I guess I'd need to use a read loop to get the lines one at a
> time rather than having it buffer. Upda
Op 19-06-2008 om 13:47 schreef Geert Stappers:
> > + if [ "$usage" = "dhcp" ]; then
> > + NET_CONFIG=dhcp
> > + else
> > + NET_CONFIG=static
> > + IP_ADDRESS=$(cat "$netinfo" | grep "^my_ipaddress" |
> > sed 's/.*=//')
> > +
> + if [ "$usage" = "dhcp" ]; then
> + NET_CONFIG=dhcp
> + else
> + NET_CONFIG=static
> + IP_ADDRESS=$(cat "$netinfo" | grep "^my_ipaddress" |
> sed 's/.*=//')
> + NETMASK=$(cat "$netinfo" | gre
> "ST" == Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ST> Hello, It is a bit hard for blind people to know exactly when
ST> they can type boot options for the installer. It would be
ST> helpful that syslinux beeps when it is ready to get input. What
ST> do people think about it
Hello,
It is a bit hard for blind people to know exactly when they can type
boot options for the installer. It would be helpful that syslinux beeps
when it is ready to get input. What do people think about it?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
I added support for KuroBox Pro to oldsys-preseed.
The patch is tested and works. (I'll submit tests/arm
later when I have created them.)
The default IP address is 192.168.11.150, there is no
default gateway and ns but I set it to 192.168.11.1
because that is what I would have expected by default
This bug is even more severe than it first looked. The Choices list is
completely ignored by cdebconf when a db_get is done immediately after a
db_subst that sets a variable used in Choices (or with a db_input in
between that gets skipped because of priority).
From a trace in #486558:
debconf: --
It still isn't working. I now get an immediate "bad mirror". db_get on
mirror/http/mirror is empty, so mirror_root is still null.
Below a debconf trace with the new code (no default) and two debug log
statements added by me. Boot in "auto" mode.
It clearly shows mirror/http/mirror getting its var
38 matches
Mail list logo
