Frans Pop wrote:
AFAIK grub (at least the default "legacy" version) also still has problems
with / on XFS. That's the one other case where D-I automatically falls
back to lilo.
I think you mean /boot on XFS. Having / as XFS seems to work fine for me...
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Eric Dorland wrote:
> Well I think Google generally does treat the Iceweasel user agent
> properly.
Not in the case of maps.google.com, where the sidebar cannot be hidden
in iceweasel, can in firefox.
> > I'm afraid that documenting it in README.Debian won't help desktop users
> > who just find t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 486558 choose-mirror 2.24
Bug#486558: installation-reports: strange (null) in URL for tasksel for
automatic install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `choose-mirror'.
> severity 486558 important
Bug#486558: installation-re
reassign 486558 choose-mirror 2.24
severity 486558 important
tags 486558 confirmed
thanks
Thanks for the report.
On Monday 16 June 2008, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> I tried the automatic install, and everything was fine until I got the
> following error: "Bad archive mirror".
>
reassign 480935 rootskel-bootfloppy
retitle 480935 Explicit sanity checking needed for build-time problems?
tags 480935 - d-i
thanks
On Monday 16 June 2008, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Holger: at least this means you can now test if the new syslinux
> > solves your boot problem; please try both the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 480935 rootskel-bootfloppy
Bug#480935: installationreport: floppy install 20080227 not working
Bug reassigned from package `syslinux' to `rootskel-bootfloppy'.
> retitle 480935 Explicit sanity checking needed for build-time problems?
Bug#48093
Thanks for your reply, Frans. As for the enhancement requests for e2fsprogs
and s390-tools to respect and support the RECOMP option of CMS minidisks, those
are not distribution specific. I would hope that they could be bumped
upstream. In theory, partman is not distribution-specific either, a
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinstall CD (ISO)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2008-06-16
Machine: VirtualBox 1.6.2
Processor: Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.5 GHz
Memory: 256MB
Partitions: root on 8
tag 486549 help
severity 486549 wishlist
thanks
On Monday 16 June 2008, Stephen Powell wrote:
> The single partition implicitly created on a z/VM minidisk by the CMS
> FORMAT command (and optionally, the CMS RESERVE command) is not
> recognized by partman.
Your request is no doubt completely vali
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 486549 help
Bug#486549: The single partition present on a CMS minidisk is not supported
(s390/s390x only)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> severity 486549 wishlist
Bug#486549: The single partition present on a CMS minidisk is not support
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 06:02:16PM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
> console-setup is currently frozen because it provides a udeb.
Done
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madi
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:42:36AM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello,
>
> please unblock klibc 1.5.10-1
done
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpr4Prc8AVT
Package: partman-base
Version: 105
This bug applies only to the s390 and s390x architectures.
The single partition implicitly created on a z/VM minidisk by the CMS FORMAT
command (and optionally, the CMS RESERVE command) is not recognized by partman.
mke2fs, mkswap, etc. recognize such a parti
reassign 486541 grub-installer 1.32
severity 486541 wishlist
tags 486541 wontfix
retitle 486541 Grub fails after changing boot disk order in BIOS
thanks
On Monday 16 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> * PROBLEM on first reboot: chosen in BIOS to boot from IDE1 (=hdb)
IMO t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 486541 grub-installer 1.32
Bug#486541: grub problem with debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
> severity 486541 wishlist
Bug#486541: grub problem with debian-installer
Severity set to `wishli
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/
debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso (16-Jun-2008 11:14)
Date: 16-Jun-2008 18:00
Machine: Desktop PC (Mainboard Elitegroup K7S5A)
Processor: Athlon XP-1700+
Memory
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:27:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#479781: Debootstrap
has caused the Debian Bug report #479781,
regarding Debootstrap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
I managed to install base system with ext2 file system instead of ext3.
However, during installation of GUI I got parity errors. Looks like
disk hardware problem.
Please close the bug report.
/Anders
--
Anders Winnberg tel: +46 31 772 5533
Onsala Space Observatory fax: +46 31 772
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 485655 tasksel 2.74
Bug#485655: debian-installer: The KDE images should use sudo too and configure
KDE accordingly.
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `tasksel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 485655 tasksel 2.74
thanks
On Monday 16 June 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> It seems easier at the moment to add your code, and include it in the
> task than it does to change the default or remove the debconf use, and
> come up with a way to detect which tasks were installed[1].
Sounds good t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hello,
>
> please unblock klibc 1.5.10-1
>
> was 10 days in unstable without trouble and fixes some utils.
> no lib changes itself.
>
> hpa just pushed out 1.5.11, i'd like to upload that tomorrow
> as s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> console-setup is currently frozen because it provides a udeb.
>
> As the D-I beta2 is out and, anyway, console-setup's udeb is not used
> in D-I as of now, I think it's OK for it to enter testing.
No ob
(Dropping d-release again.)
On Monday 16 June 2008, peter green wrote:
> >> I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
> >> moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a
> >> shape
>
> Can either version of grub handle all the cases that lilo can?
D-I cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/08 04:19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
>> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
(Dropping d-release for this part of the discussion.)
On Monday 16 June 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We still very regularly get installation reports where people use
> > lilo rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> would say that the activity on the bug report shows the same.
OTOH, aren't most of the
I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
Can either version of grub handle all the cases that lilo can? for
example can either of them handle the situation where root is on lvm and
there is no
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:29:43AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > So the user agent thing is fairly well documented at
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/399633, but basically it's our stand against
> > > user-agent insanity. We could of
William Pitcock wrote:
> I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
> moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
That's just great. That means that whoever did this just broke an option
that's been available in Debian Installer since forever: to
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 13 June 2008, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Earlier instances of the same problem. The 8 GiB barrier was because
>> > of the BIOS only issuing one 24-bit ATA command. I'm not sure how
>> > common will the new limit be in comparison.
>>
>> As w
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > So the user agent thing is fairly well documented at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/399633, but basically it's our stand against
> > user-agent insanity. We could of course make it say Firefox easily,
> > but this certainly seems a bit de
31 matches
Mail list logo
