A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
!!! There were errors during the build process.
!!! Please check the log and correct the errors.
Only architectures (if any) that were built correctly have been uploaded.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.al
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: normal
I successfully debootstrapped sid, and then look a look at the end of
bootstrap.log.
Setting up klogd (1.5-2) ...
Starting kernel log daemon...
Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing
.
Setting up tasksel-data (2.73) ...
Setting u
Hello,
Since some people know that I am subscribed to this list, I am announcing publically my
unsubscription from the list.
My reasons vary from lack of time, lost interest and personal life changes to huge number of
maintainance mails in relation to *my* perceeved SNR of the list (in the li
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_1.10_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_1.10_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_1.10.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.10.dsc
flash-kernel_1.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.10.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.10_arm.deb
to
flash-kernel_1.10_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_1.10.dsc
flash-kernel_1.10.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.10_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_1.10_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-10 12:33]:
> No, it is not. At least not for all subarches:
> XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx <---!!!
Doh, thanks for catching this.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> this version fixes #471024 which affects the graphical installer:
>> please unblock it.
>
> Sorry by delayed answer. No objection.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Accepted:
partman-palo_11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_11.dsc
partman-palo_11.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_11.tar.gz
partman-palo_11_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_11_hppa.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-palo_11.dsc - s
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm pretty exited about this as it's something that's on my mind for
> probably two years now and IMO has the potential to make D-I a lot more
> user friendly.
As Joeyh mentioned, there were discussions about similar ideas in the
past and, in short, I li
Op 10-05-2008 om 15:03 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Saturday 10 May 2008, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > What means "POC"?
Proof of Concept
> Why don't you try google before creating useless noise on the list?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What means "POC"?
Why don't you try google before creating useless noise on the list?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
partman-palo_11_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-palo_11.dsc
partman-palo_11.tar.gz
partman-palo_11_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Op 10-05-2008 om 13:27 schreef Ian Campbell:
>
> Not yet tested POC patch attached.
What means "POC"?
POC?
Piece of Code?
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summary: d-i 4.0r3 resized succesfull MSFT Windows XP NTFS partition.
Hello Debian-Installer People,
Earlier this week I did resize succesfully a NTFS partition.
Before I started was worried some what, but it turned out all fine.
This feedback posting describes the repartition action.
The i
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 13:05 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Would modifying the way $console is determined at lines 32-37 to work
> off of /proc/cmdline in the same way grub-installer works (i.e.
> pulling out the last console=) be acceptable?
Of course that doesn't work if there is no console= l
The attached enables a getty on hvc0 when installing under Xen. I'm not
terribly happy with doing this by checking for the presence of
both /sys/bus/xen && /dev/hvc0.
Would modifying the way $console is determined at lines 32-37 to work
off of /proc/cmdline in the same way grub-installer works (i.
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Maybe this change could be a good occasion to remind users that the
> keyboard mapping at that moment is a US keymap and not a localized
> one. Get the point ?
I've added a note with the following text:
The keyboard is assumed to have a default A
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Any idea against which package to report these? debconf?
> kernel-package?
>
> May 10 08:40:03 in-target: Setting up linux-image-2.6.25-1-orion5x
> (2.6.25-1) ... May 10 08:40:08 debconf: Obsolete command TITLE
> Configuring linux-image-2.6.25-1-
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> At the end of the installation, I got a message saying that no boot
> loader was installed. I went to the menu and found that
> flash-kernel-installer had not been loaded, which is strange because
> its standard on arm.
No, it is not. At least no
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-10 11:57]:
> > Same basically goes for the first: if all arches need it it is fine
> > to do it in kernel-wedge. And if that is the case, the above becomes
> > rather academic and should be done anyway.
>
>
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.91
Severity: minor
I just tried an installation of unstable on Orion and got a message
asking me to select a kernel. I believe I got this message because
while linux-image-2.6.25-1-orion5x is available,
linux-image-2.6-orion5x is not.
Anyway, the strange thing
One more question: again, same scenario, installing on Orion with
unstable because it needs 2.6.25 kernel. I got the usual "Continue
the install without loading kernel modules" message but that's okay
since I put the important kernel udebs on the initrd.
At the end of the installation, I got a me
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-10 11:57]:
> Same basically goes for the first: if all arches need it it is fine
> to do it in kernel-wedge. And if that is the case, the above becomes
> rather academic and should be done anyway.
How can we find out whether all arches need it?
--
Martin
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> How about this when we move to 2.6.25:
>
> Index: package-list
> ===
> --- package-list (revision 53285)
> +++ package-list (working copy)
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
> This pack
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Anyway, the strange thing was the title of the message: "Configuring
> locales". I couldn't find where this came from, but it would be nice
> if someone could fix this. Thanks.
No idea. Please file a minor BR against base-installer.
signature.
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Frans, I noticed you added a crypto-core-modules udeb that contains
> blkcipher. This module has been renamed to crypto_blkcipher in
> 2.6.25. What's the best way to handle this in kernel-wedge? Modify
> crypto-core-modules so it looks like this
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 14:02:30 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> With that in mind, I'd like to ask for the cairo unblock.
>
Shouldn't pixman be unblocked too, then, to get libpixman-1-0-udeb in
testing?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have updated the section in the Installation Guide that explains the boot
> screen and would appreciate a review before I commit it.
As usual, the documentation is clear and I see no obvious correction
to do...
Maybe this change could be a good occasi
Any idea against which package to report these? debconf? kernel-package?
May 10 08:40:03 in-target: Setting up linux-image-2.6.25-1-orion5x (2.6.25-1)
...
May 10 08:40:08 debconf: Obsolete command TITLE Configuring
linux-image-2.6.25-1-orion5x called
May 10 08:40:08 in-target: Use of uninitial
I just tried an installation of unstable on Orion and got a message
asking me to select a kernel. I believe I got this message because
while linux-image-2.6.25-1-orion5x is available,
linux-image-2.6-orion5x is not.
Anyway, the strange thing was the title of the message: "Configuring
locales". I
And one more issue with 2.6.25. I get the following:
kernel-wedge find-dups 2.6.25-1-orion5x
debian/crypto-modules-2.6.25-1-orion5x-di
lib/modules/2.6.25-1-orion5x/kernel/crypto/crypto_blkcipher.ko
debian/crypto-core-modules-2.6.25-1-orion5x-di
lib/modules/2.6.25-1-orion5x/kernel/crypto
Frans, I noticed you added a crypto-core-modules udeb that contains
blkcipher. This module has been renamed to crypto_blkcipher in
2.6.25. What's the best way to handle this in kernel-wedge? Modify
crypto-core-modules so it looks like this:
blkcipher ?
crypto_blkcipher ?
or simply replace blkc
32 matches
Mail list logo
