On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> While writing this, I'm wondering whether we could launch the
> -l10n-english fellows on the giant task of reviewing the installation
> manual...As I stopped working on Smith reviews temporarily, I
> have to keep them busy...:-)
I'm not in fav
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the section in the installation guide about configuring apt to
> describe that it is now possible to scan multiple CDs.
>
> I'd welcome comments on the new text before I commit the changes.
I read the entire proposal and found nothi
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm still not sure whether this qualifies as a simplification or not :-/
Also, where is the change that actually tests for a return value of 4?
Or, in other words, how hard do we really need this?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
I'm still not sure whether this qualifies as a simplification or not :-/
Cheers,
FJP
On Saturday 01 March 2008, Philip Hands wrote:
> +++ packages/debian-installer-utils/debian/rules 2008-02-29
> 21:48:43.0 + @@ -40,13 +40,14 @@
[...]
> + dh_link -p di-utils /usr/lib/fetch-ur
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> unblock gtk+2.0/2.12.8-1
> unblock win32-loader/0.6.3
> unblock openssl/0.9.8g-7
> unblock ttf-sil-abyssinica/1.0-4
IMO these would be better left until after the D-I release as they have
udebs that are included in D-I initrds and the D-I image
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here goes a small set of hints for packages that can go to testing:
unblock gtk+2.0/2.12.8-1
unblock hdparm/8.3-1
unblock win32-loader/0.6.3
unblock openssl/0.9.8g-7
unblock ttf-sil-abyssinica/1.0-4
Cheers,
- --
O T A V I OS A L
Accepted:
pkgsel_0.18.dsc
to pool/main/p/pkgsel/pkgsel_0.18.dsc
pkgsel_0.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/pkgsel/pkgsel_0.18.tar.gz
pkgsel_0.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/pkgsel/pkgsel_0.18_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
pkgsel_0.18.dsc - source debian-installer
pkgsel_0.18_all.udeb - st
pkgsel_0.18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pkgsel_0.18.dsc
pkgsel_0.18.tar.gz
pkgsel_0.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Hi,
I've updated the section in the installation guide about configuring apt to
describe that it is now possible to scan multiple CDs.
I'd welcome comments on the new text before I commit the changes.
A diff of en/using-d-i/modules/apt-setup.xml is attached. The new text can
be previewed at: h
Hi!
These days, I have been working on column support for cdebconf again.
I had previously submitted a patch [1] which was not included due to
concerns expressed about using tab ('\t', 0x09 in ASCII) as the field
separator. [2]
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/10/msg00400.html
[2] htt
A Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:44:22, Jérémy Bobbio escreveu:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
> I strongly disagree. It took me more than a full day to produce this
> "changelog" after reviewing more than 14
Hello,
I am running debian etch stable from a net install cd I just downloaded.
I have 4x 500gb drives.
Each drive has 2 partitions. 1gb and 499gb.
raid 1 - each 1gb has been setup as raid 1
raid 5- each 499gb partition was setup as raid 5 totaling a raid 5
partition as 1500gb / 1.5Tb
I set the
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:08:19PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Jeroen,
>
> Please sync those source packages on testing:
>
> pciutils
> etch-support
Done.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN;
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> >> I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release
> >> announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually
> >> meant to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release
>> announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually
>> meant to be a part of i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jeroen,
Please sync those source packages on testing:
pciutils
etch-support
Cheers,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239
Op 04-03-2008 om 15:23 schreef Otavio Salvador:
> Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release
> > announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually
> > meant to be a part of it, as a simple, human-readable compi
Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal
cdebconf's dpkg-reconfigure currently only runs the config and postinst
scripts.
debconf's dpkg-reconfigure runs 3 scripts:
foreach my $info (['prerm','upgrade', $version],
['config', 'reconfigure', $version],
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Guido Günther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > +# :sl3:
> > +_Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the multipath device?
> > + Installation of GRUB on multipath is experimental.
>
> I'm not very keen to add warnings about experimental fea
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release
> announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually
> meant to be a part of it, as a simple, human-readable compilations of
> the various changes in the installer since
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Please take a look at current Release Announce[1] draft. It has some
>> > XXX strings that need to be fixed and also general improvem
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Please take a look at current Release Announce[1] draft. It has some
> > XXX strings that need to be fixed and also general improvement.
>
> I've finally taken a look at the "draf
I just wanted to confirm that it indeed works for me.
Perhaps not very relevant, as by now everyone should have upgraded to
Etch, anyway.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 460824 patch
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 460824 origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
thanks
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 05:58:37AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I can easily reproduce this from a debug shell:
> # mount /dev/hda1 /mnt/ -t ext3 -o relatime
> mount: Mounting /dev/hda1 on /mnt/ failed: Inv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 460824 patch
Bug#460824: Busybox mount: error when relatime option is used
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: patch
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 460824 origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
Bug#46
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008, you wrote:
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> > As far as the Intel document says, it is not bound to the 2.6 kernel.
> > See http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009209.htm
> >
> > We are several people who want a solution for this problem. If
Your message dated Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:49:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#469208: bug report pci don't works
has caused the Debian Bug report #469208,
regarding bug report pci don't works
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
27 matches
Mail list logo
