Hi,
it would be great if you could unblock ttf-dejavu 2.23-1 which
fixes an important issue [1].
Thanx alot in advance,
Davide
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200712191257.59357.benlaenen%40gmail.com&forum_name=dejavu-fonts
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think that prefmeta (preferred metapackage) is more logical for the
> template name from my point of view. I'd like to get a comment from
> Christian since he always gives good suggestions on this cases :-)
Well, when it comes at template *names*
On Feb 4, 2008 12:53 AM, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all comments that has been sent to this thread, I've changed the
> timeline to the following:
>
> +--+---+
> |March 3, 2007 |planned release date
reassign 463866 debian-installer-utils
severity 463866 wishlist
thanks
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps this code should be in in-target instead?
Seems reasonable to add this in debian-installer-utils, in the function
library chroot-setup.sh (which is sourced by i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 463855 installation-reports
Bug#463855: Testing ISO (DVD and Netinst)
Warning: Unknown package 'netinst'
Warning: Unknown package 'iso'
Bug reassigned from package `netinst iso' to `installation-reports'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please
Package: Netinst ISO
Version: daily builds of 02/03/08 and build #1 of 03/03/08
The last Netinst ISOs, at least in my system, are unable
to install Grub (on the contrary, the ISO of stable
work fine). The same trouble with the DVD 1 of Testing.
Morevoer, they have a strange dependencies system.
"
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Dropping CCs to d-release/kernel/cd.)
>
> On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Those patches looks OK for commiting right now from my point of view.
>
> I want at least confirmation that this will actually be the way we're going
> to do Et
(Dropping CCs to d-release/kernel/cd.)
On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Those patches looks OK for commiting right now from my point of view.
I want at least confirmation that this will actually be the way we're going
to do Etch+1/2. I've also just sent a mail to Ted Tso with
On Monday 04 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> There is one issue, which I will detail in a follow-up mail to
> debian-boot only. The short summary is that for arm the etchnhalf kernel
> meta packages are currently not considered "installable", so as things
> stand now the above would not work for
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
> You've probably seen that a new grub has been uploaded, which should solve
> this issue for unstable and etch.
Lenny
<...>
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Theodore Y. T
Hello Ted,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:00:20 -0500, Ted Tso wrote:
> If the grub maintainers can't figure out a way to break up the
> monolithic patch quickly, or to get it incorporated into Debian, or
> get it upstreamed ASAP, one of the things that I could do is change
> mke2fs.conf in the udeb file,
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Because of changes in the installation procedure since I implemented
> the "sarge-support" udeb, I first needed to ensure installation of the
> etch-support udeb is queued in cdrom-detect and iso-scan. With that, we
> will have the following situation
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have been quite disappointed that there was no real follow-up to my
> mails, which now leaves us in the situation that there is basically no
> support yet to select the correct kernel for etch+1/2.
Being the sucker that I am, I did start to look int
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> But lenny isn't broken since current lenny version of e2fsprogs is
>>> still using 128 bytes as inode size.
>>
>> NO!
>>
>> The e2fsprogs _udeb_ in unstab
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> But lenny isn't broken since current lenny version of e2fsprogs is
>> still using 128 bytes as inode size.
>
> NO!
>
> The e2fsprogs _udeb_ in unstable already has the 256 default and _that_ is
> what is
On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> But lenny isn't broken since current lenny version of e2fsprogs is
> still using 128 bytes as inode size.
NO!
The e2fsprogs _udeb_ in unstable already has the 256 default and _that_ is
what is used when you create partitions in partman with da
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 03 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Please, can you make sure e2fsprogs-udeb >= 1.40.5-1 doesn't reach
>> > testing before grub 0.97-30 (just uploaded) has? Otherwise D-I builds
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Please, can you make sure e2fsprogs-udeb >= 1.40.5-1 doesn't reach
> > testing before grub 0.97-30 (just uploaded) has? Otherwise D-I builds
> > will fail to boot onto installed system.
>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:06:13PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please unblock directfb/1.0.1-6. The sparc binaries are still missing,
> > though.
>
> No objection
done
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Please unblock directfb/1.0.1-6. The sparc binaries are still missing,
> though.
No objection
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 03 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> - e2fsprogs inode size change
>> >>
>> >>Lastest release[1] changed the default inode size to 256
>> >>bytes. This is not yet on lenny but is already available on sid and
>> >>will hit len
Hello,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 22:07:54 +0100 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing wrong. The last upload of netcfg was on Jan 14, so any changes made
> _after_ that date will not yet be included in current images.
>
Ah, ok, thanks. I wasn't aware of that.
Holger
--
==
Package: debian-installer
Version: n/a; 2008-02-03
When using the d-i image to install Debian Edu/Lenny, I ran into a
problem with missing ptys. We install debian-edu-config very early in
the installation, and this will try to enable debian-edu-etc-svk,
which need to use expect to initialize the
Hi,
Please unblock directfb/1.0.1-6. The sparc binaries are still missing,
though.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> - e2fsprogs inode size change
> >>
> >>Lastest release[1] changed the default inode size to 256
> >>bytes. This is not yet on lenny but is already available on sid and
> >>will hit lenny in few days.
> >>
> >>1. http://e2fspro
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD netinst testing
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sun Feb 3 21:33:36 CET 2008
Machine: ASUS P5B
Processor: Intel duo E6600
Memory: 2G
Partitions: (two di
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.71
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
transmission is an easy and fast lightweight BitTorrent client.
gnome-btdownload lacks many features in comparison.
---
tasks/gnome-desktop |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tasks/gnome-desktop b/t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 463842 grub-installer
Bug#463842: mention highpoint/grub conflict in D-I errata
Bug reassigned from package `grub2' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all comments that has been sent to this thread, I've changed the
timeline to the following:
+--+---+
| Date | What happens |
+---
clone 394868 -1
retitle -1 mention highpoint/grub conflict in D-I errata
tags 394868 moreinfo
thanks
Sorry, I thought I was reassigning from GRUB Legacy, not from grub-installer.
Anyway, I'm willing to look into this, but we need more information, see my
questions at:
https://savannah.gnu.org/
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Please, can you make sure e2fsprogs-udeb >= 1.40.5-1 doesn't reach testing
> before grub 0.97-30 (just uploaded) has? Otherwise D-I builds will fail to
> boot onto installed system.
>
> For details see #463236, #463123.
I've added a note on the
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Before begin to answer, I want to say that I agree with you and will
follow your advice of do a 2.6.22 based release and prepare a beta2
changing the kernel just after beta1 release.
> On Thursday 31 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> - kernel to releas
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm not familiar with this part; could it be that we just need to adjust
> XB-Installer-Menu-Item in yaboot-installer ?
From installer/doc/devel/menu-item-numbers.txt:
7000 apt-setup
pkgsel
7300 palo-installer (hppa)
grub-installer (i38
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 03 February 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > It may have *meant* GRUB2, but what it *said* was GRUB. In any case,
> > it doesn't work, and presents an impediment to an otherwise nominal
> > installation process.
GRUB Legacy and GR
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Robert: I guess this must be because of your changes in version 1.26?
> It's possibly OK to offer grub2 as an option for powerpc, but I doubt it
> should be the default choice at this point.
>
> Also, if only some subarchitectures ar
reassign 463765 grub-installer 1.26
severity 463765 serious
thanks
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> It was a nominal installation until it came time to write a boot loader.
> It presented me with a top-level installer menu, with "Install GRUB boot
> loader" hilighted.
On Sunday 0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 395839 ipv6
Bug#395839: busybox: IPv6 support for busybox wget
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: ipv6
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 463765 grub-installer 1.26
Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install "grub" bootloader on
PowerPC. Why?
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'.
> severity 463765 serious
Bug#463765: debian-installer
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:39:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
First of all, I am very sorry for the big delay I have caused in this
topic. I was not aware of your mail and that you are waiting for a
response since I have not read this list for quite a while (I thought
consensus was found since the p
40 matches
Mail list logo
