On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:38:11AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 28-01-2008 om 00:41 schreef Daniel Dickinson:
> > I've got a project I've been working on in fits and starts that I'd
> > like to use d-i for. I'm working on a utility system that allows
> > restore/rescue/repair/modification of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 456578 installation-reports
Bug#456578: debian-installer: after first reboot, grub says: "unknown
filesystem type" and then hangs
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
> severity 456578 normal
Bug#456578: d
not sure if this matters, but i just noticed debian also doesn't allow
my headphone, line out, and microphone to work. also, there is a volume
control that doesn't change the volume. not major issues, but would be
nice to have.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
x27;ve included a fairly strict check of allowed version numbers, based on
what we've used in the past. This is mainly because we don't want really
weird versions ending up as directory names on the mirrors.
The following formats are allowed:
- MMDD : regular upload to u
On Saturday 27 October 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I spoke to Colin at debconf about getting automatic processing of d-i
> byhand uploads happening -- rather than needing an ftpmaster to unpack
> the installer-* stuff directly. The dak-side implementation is pretty
> much done now, and works for t
On Monday 28 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Yes. I think that we should make it installed in following arches:
>
> - sparc (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/06/30/HNsparclaptop_1.html)
Does laptop-detect currently actually support detection of Sparc laptops? If
it does not, then IMO i
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:54:22AM -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
...
> What is the feeling, in principal, about having system rescue stuff in
> d-i? What about foreign os rescue/backup/imaging? Is there anyway to
> have this available without borking d-i or will I need to maintain a
> shadow arc
On 28/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > I'm hoping that the udebs don't mean anything to d-i unless the d-i
> > build scripts pull them in as specifically directed and therefore don't
> > impact on d-i unless you want them to.
>
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:45:11 +0100
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > I'm hoping that the udebs don't mean anything to d-i unless the d-i
> > build scripts pull them in as specifically directed and therefore
> > don't impact on d-i unless
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 27 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Today while talking about the removal of laptop-detect from tasksel
>> depends list, specially for s390, vorlon noticed that we'd need to
>> change tasksel from arch all to arch any to make it possible.
>
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I'm hoping that the udebs don't mean anything to d-i unless the d-i
> build scripts pull them in as specifically directed and therefore don't
> impact on d-i unless you want them to.
I'm afraid they do. For various reasons adding udebs to the ar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462910 kernel-wedge
Bug#462910: Please provide the udeb packages.
Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to `kernel-wedge'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Op 28-01-2008 om 00:41 schreef Daniel Dickinson:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a project I've been working on in fits and starts that I'd
> like to use d-i for. I'm working on a utility system that allows
> restore/rescue/repair/modification of a linux system (the restore is to
> be a local or networked res
13 matches
Mail list logo
