Hi Martin
On Oct 26, 2007 2:49 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lowmem 2 Oct 25 13:45:22 - Oct 25 14:49:07 1:04
> lowmem 1 Oct 25 16:54:59 - Oct 25 19:46:35 2:52
I still get the same results with lowmem level 1 installations and
flash-kernel_1.5 (corrected menu-item number)
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:04:28AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 03 November 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> > Here's an updated patch that implements Joey's suggestion of extending
> > mirror/udeb/suite to support multiple suites. Again I've omitted the
> > indention of the inner loop to make
On Saturday 03 November 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> Here's an updated patch that implements Joey's suggestion of extending
> mirror/udeb/suite to support multiple suites. Again I've omitted the
> indention of the inner loop to make it clear what has changed.
Has this been tested?
> What I don't l
Frans, Joey: thanks for your beedback, and sorry for the latency - I
was travelling/offline quite a bit in the past week.
Here's an updated patch that implements Joey's suggestion of extending
mirror/udeb/suite to support multiple suites. Again I've omitted the
indention of the inner loop to make
On Friday 02 November 2007, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I plan to commit my patches tomorrow after a bit more testing, upload
> > pkgsel at once and upload di-utils and apt-setup after apt/debconf
> > migrate.
>
> Dann have not merged his changes, it would be
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I plan to commit my patches tomorrow after a bit more testing, upload pkgsel
> at once and upload di-utils and apt-setup after apt/debconf migrate.
Dann have not merged his changes, it would be nice to commit his
pkgsel changes before you upload it.
Dann?
On Friday 02 November 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> * Needs svn debconf, which I won't upload for at least another 4 days,
> since Frans's patch needs unstable debconf to propigate testing.
Or upload with medium prio? Unless new changes are somewhat experimental of
course.
Also, I want to wait for
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
I've tested and fixed up yesterday's patch. I think this works rather
well, just a few issues:
* debconf-apt-progress only advances the bar 15% while downloading,
I'll de-hardcode that later.
* 50mirror validates a mirror and then adds a deb-src line at the end.
The progress bar for downloadin
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# death to spam
reopen 328498
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # closed by spam
> reopen 328498
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: cdebconf-newt-udeb
Version: 0.125
As shown in the screenshots debconf_displcorr1 and debconf_displcorr2 at
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/, there is some display corruption
when the XOrg screen resolution multiselect dialog is displayed on top of a
progress bar. After the dialog,
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
"This product has completely re-built my self confidence.
I would not believe it unless I had seen it for my self.
I am very impressed with ManSter."
Richard, USA
See: www.guiset.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.31_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.31_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.31_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.31.dsc
to poo
apt-setup_0.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.31.dsc
apt-setup_0.31.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.31_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.31_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.31_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:04:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Work from home
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.iso
15-Oct-2007
Date: 2-Nov-2007
Machine: Main Board:K8M800-MLVF Rev.B (via k8m800/ via VT8237)
Processor: AMD Sempron 2800+
Memory: 512MB
Partitions:
Hi,
On Thursday 01 November 2007 19:34, Holger Levsen wrote:
> We've already done that for our etch release, released in July. There, we
> only support installation from network with a DVD, the CD installs need
s/from/without/
> network. The size of the need
This bug is much worse in Etch. Debian-Installer overwrites the
Solaris partition's bootloader, without even asking! I am changing
the severity level to Critical. One of the definitions of Critical
is "makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system)
break." This bug breaks Solaris,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 293867 critical
Bug#293867: should offer to install silo to partition instead of MBR with silo
-t
Severity set to `critical' from `wishlist'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> We could add a warning about that in the installation guide, but I don't
> think there is much more that we can do than that. I would personally
> qualify any data loss resulting from that as being caused by "user
> error".
FWIW, that warning has no
27 matches
Mail list logo
