Re: r49295 - in trunk/packages/arch/i386/win32-loader: . debian l10n l10n/po templates

Robert Millan wrote: > I would just have win32-loader.ini have an _optional_ parameter like > "desktop=(gnome|kde|xfce)" that CDs can use to tell win32-loader that there's > only this desktop choice. Like with other options in win32-loader.ini, its > non-presence means all are available and user c

Bug#442287: frontend mismatch

dpkg-reconfigure was crashing because I had edited questions.dat and set debconf/frontend to text, while /etc/cdebconf.conf had it set to newt. This seemed to make dpkg-reconfigure use a weird mix of the newt and text frontends. First it started up the newt frontend (clearing the screen), and then

Bug#443760: dpkg-reconfigure does not detect config script exiting nonzero

Package: cdebconf Version: 0.123 Severity: normal cdebconf's dpkg-reconfigure exits zero even if the config script exited nonzero. confmodule_shutdown() seems to not set the right exit status in this case. (dpkg-reconfigure was always exiting 126, since it failed to call confmodule_shutdown(), I

Processed: unblock 328498 with 442287

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > unblock 328498 with 442287 Bug#442287: dpkg-reconfigure segfaults Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331

Bug#443627: marked as done (cdebconf breaks installations when debconf isn't installed)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:32:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443627: fixed in cdebconf 0.123 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

cdebconf_0.123_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.123_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.123_i386.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.123_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.123_i386.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.123_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.123_all.udeb cdebco

Processing of cdebconf_0.123_i386.changes

cdebconf_0.123_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.123.dsc cdebconf_0.123.tar.gz cdebconf-priority_0.123_all.udeb cdebconf_0.123_i386.deb libdebconfclient0_0.123_i386.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.123_i386.deb cdebconf-udeb_0.123_i386.udeb

Re: potential help for #443874

Geert Stappers wrote: > How to get 'elf_data.hpp' ? Try svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/d-i/people/waldi/packages/mklibs-old instead. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#443709: FTBFS: Does not handle comments starting with #

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > console-setup fails because it does not handle files that have > > comments beginning with #: > > Anyone objecting to /me committing Matt's patch? I have just uploaded the package. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Bug#443709: FTBFS: Does not handle comments starting with #

> > console-setup fails because it does not handle files that have > > comments beginning with #: > > > Anyone objecting to /me committing Matt's patch? Well, Anton was quicker than me..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#443709: marked as done (FTBFS: Does not handle comments starting with #)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443709: fixed in console-setup 1.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#443709: FTBFS: Does not handle comments starting with #

Quoting Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: console-setup > Version: 1.18 > Severity: serious > > console-setup fails because it does not handle files that have > comments beginning with #: Anyone objecting to /me committing Matt's patch? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#438395: marked as done (console-setup: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#438395: fixed in console-setup 1.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#435285: marked as done (console-setup: ugly six dots in /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#435285: fixed in console-setup 1.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

console-setup_1.19_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: bdf2psf_1.19_all.deb to pool/main/c/console-setup/bdf2psf_1.19_all.deb console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.19_all.udeb to pool/main/c/console-setup/console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.19_all.udeb console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.19_all.udeb to pool/main/c/console-setup/console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.1

Processing of console-setup_1.19_i386.changes

console-setup_1.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: console-setup_1.19.dsc console-setup_1.19.tar.gz console-setup_1.19_all.deb console-setup-mini_1.19_all.deb bdf2psf_1.19_all.deb console-setup-udeb_1.19_all.udeb console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.19_all

Bug#443709: FTBFS: Does not handle comments starting with #

Package: console-setup Version: 1.18 Severity: serious console-setup fails because it does not handle files that have comments beginning with #: ./ckbcomp: instead of "#ཨ༁ྸༀkey{[0x1000f21,0x1000f2a,0x1000" in cn expected };. The attached patch fixes this problem. -- Matt diff -ru console-setu