Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1189059142 time_t, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
The debian-installer team would like to fix a few issues that are still
present in the Etch version of d-i.
Before starting the work on updating the packages, I would like to get
feedback from the stable release managers on those c
At 1189059142 time_t, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> The debian-installer team would like to fix a few issues that are still
> present in the Etch version of d-i.
>
> Before starting the work on updating the packages, I would like to get
> feedback from the stable release managers on those candidate patch
Package: lilo-installer
Severity: normal
Hi!
The template "lilo-installer/manual_bootdev" in lilo-installer has not
been updated since the compatibility with devfs-style device names has
been removed from the debian-installer. It currently reads:
Please enter the partition or disk onto which L
Hi!
The debian-installer team would like to fix a few issues that are still
present in the Etch version of d-i.
Before starting the work on updating the packages, I would like to get
feedback from the stable release managers on those candidate patches:
* cdebconf: Fix off-by-one error reading f
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:27:17 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
> > of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence cost than
> > managing one more udeb, we're doing somet
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:01:22AM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:45:03PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > You first need to select "Configure encrypted volumes" near the
> > top of the partman main menu to setup the encrypted partitions.
I realize that my wording ("You
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> Actually, it is a lot cheaper than having another udeb to track from a
>> d-i RM point of view...
>
> Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
> of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:45:03PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:43:45PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > I tried to create an encrypted partition from d-i on etch. So I
> > select "use as crypted partition" and can modify crypto parameters.
> > All good and well. But where d
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:43:45PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I tried to create an encrypted partition from d-i on etch. So I
> select "use as crypted partition" and can modify crypto parameters.
> All good and well. But where do I assign the mount point for the
> crypted partition?
You
i.iso [1] after burning it. It will download all
the necessary components of the debian-installer through the network and
proceed the installation as you would expect.
[1] http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/20070905-09:01/netboot/mini.iso
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
Hello,
I tried to create an encrypted partition from d-i on etch. So I
select "use as crypted partition" and can modify crypto parameters.
All good and well. But where do I assign the mount point for the
crypted partition?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Actually, it is a lot cheaper than having another udeb to track from a
> d-i RM point of view...
Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence cost than
managing one more udeb, we're doing so
i386: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/20070905-09:01/
Cheers,
On 31/08/07, Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:45:24PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > >> Hi folks
> > >>
> > >> I prepared a busybox update. The following changes are not yet done:
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Guido, could you try to link libaio statically to the multipath-tools
> > for the udeb?
>
> While doing this would be as easy as using "LDFLAGS += -Wl,-Bstatic
t.
[1] amd64: http://people.debian.org/~aba/d-i/images/20070902-10:51/
or i386: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/20070905-09:01/
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ :
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Guido, could you try to link libaio statically to the multipath-tools
> for the udeb?
While doing this would be as easy as using "LDFLAGS += -Wl,-Bstatic
-laio -Wl,-Bdynamic" it kind of defeats the purpose of a shared library
comp
Hi Jeremy,
the following modules are loaded during boot and also show up in lsmod:
i2o_core
This is always needed to access your I2O hardware. It is the main
module, which provides low level access to the I2O hardware. [I2O FAQ]
i2o_block
This is the disk driver, which let you access your RAI
Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> - libsdl1.2debian-udeb
>>
>> If no one speaks up, I will ask for its removal in two days.
>
> I remember it was proposed [1] to include sdl-based games in the g-i,
> but i doubt this is ever going to happen..
Yes, I rememb
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 12:15:24PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:29:36AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > I've done a look on current available udebs and some look very useless
>> > currently and I'd like to request their re
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:29:36AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've done a look on current available udebs and some look very useless
currently and I'd like to request their removal. For it, I'd like,
first, to discuss here to see if someone complain about:
[...]
- li
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 12:15:24PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:29:36AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I've done a look on current available udebs and some look very useless
> > currently and I'd like to request their removal. For it, I'd like,
> > first, to discuss h
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:29:36AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've done a look on current available udebs and some look very useless
> currently and I'd like to request their removal. For it, I'd like,
> first, to discuss here to see if someone complain about:
> [...]
- libsdl1.2debian-ude
23 matches
Mail list logo
