Hi,
On Tue Aug 07, 2007 at 21:01:46 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Here goes a new set of hints. I think they're all ok to go but please
> let me know if there're any problem that I've missed.
>
> unblock console-setup/1.18
unblocked
> unblock dhcp3/3.0.6-1
unblocked
> unblock ttf-khmeros/5.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 436497 d-i
Bug#436497: should avoid using timers in progress bar
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> reassign 436497 newt
Bug#436497: should avoid using timers in progress
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM team,
Here goes a new set of hints. I think they're all ok to go but please
let me know if there're any problem that I've missed.
unblock console-setup/1.18
unblock dhcp3/3.0.6-1
unblock ttf-khmeros/5.0-1
unblock slang2/2.0.7-3
unblock pwgen
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436218: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387673: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314311: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314304: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294484: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.2_i386.udeb: package says priority is required, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.2_i386.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.2.dsc
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.2.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.2.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.2_all.deb
to pool/main/
debootstrap_1.0.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.2.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.2.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.2_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.2_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
FYI: The status of the debootstrap source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3.3.3
Current version: 1.0.1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: cdebconf
> Version: 0.119
> Severity: normal
>
> See #436340. clock-setup started a progress bar, set the time back by N
> seconds, stepped the progress bar by one, and it hung for N seconds.
>
> It seems that this is because newt_progress_set uses a timer to make
> ne
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436340: fixed in clock-setup 0.91
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
clock-setup_0.91.dsc
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.91.dsc
clock-setup_0.91.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.91.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.91_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.91_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
clock-setup_0.91.dsc
Luigi Rocca wrote:
> - Only negative clock skew make the script hang.
> - The script seems not to hang, but to *wait* an amount of time
> proportional to
> the clock skew found by rdate before going on to the partitioning step.
> I've actually tried this with -1s, -30s, -90s...
Warning: I took a
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.119
Severity: normal
See #436340. clock-setup started a progress bar, set the time back by N
seconds, stepped the progress bar by one, and it hung for N seconds.
It seems that this is because newt_progress_set uses a timer to make
newtFormRun return 1 millisecond afte
clock-setup_0.91_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
clock-setup_0.91.dsc
clock-setup_0.91.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.91_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Luigi Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I'm sending back the logs of an execution trace of the
> lock-setup.postinst
> script.
Please attach it so it's easier to read.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I spent some more time trying to understand what happens, and I came to the
following conclusions:
The problem seems to occur in the line 29 of the script
/var/lib/dpkg/info/clock-setup.postinst, "db_progress step 1".
If I comment out this line, everything goes on fine.
I'm new to debian, but I g
PolicyChange.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I'm using the weekly snapshot to install a system with expertgui and manual
partitioning.
I set up a boot partition on sda5, and two volumes for encryption on sda6
and sda7. (Keeping the prefab windows volumes on sda1 & sda2 to play
games.)
Then I click "configure encrypted volumes." The boot
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:29:48AM -0700, Frank Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded todays netinst CD image for i386 to test the new GRUB 2, but
> the installation of the package fails. On the third console there is an
> error message saying the package could not be downloaded (I have no Internet
Hi,
I downloaded todays netinst CD image for i386 to test the new GRUB 2, but
the installation of the package fails. On the third console there is an
error message saying the package could not be downloaded (I have no Internet
connection on the testing machine).
Would it be possible to add the GR
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Package: anna
>> Version: 1.27
>> Severity: wishlist
>> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Usertags: nostrip
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> There was a problem while autobuilding your package with
>> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nos
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:01:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436458: anna: not handling nostrip build option (policy
10.1) sid/i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
At 1186505305 time_t, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Yes, "upstream" does. We are upstream as anna is a udeb-only
> package. and there is really no point, imho, in stripping a binary
> meant for a udeb...
>
> Julien, the testing script should probably avoid testing packages that
> only produce udebs.
Quoting Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: anna
> Version: 1.27
> Severity: wishlist
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: nostrip
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package with
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
> Final binaries are still stripped.
>
> If you call
reassign 436444 clock-setup
forcemerge 436340 436444
thanks
Quoting Wojciech Zareba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Installation hangs on "Getting the time from a network time server".
This has already been r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 436444 clock-setup
Bug#436444: installation-reports: installation lenny from businesscard fails
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `clock-setup'.
> forcemerge 436340 436444
Bug#436340: Installation freezes during "configure
Package: anna
Version: 1.27
Severity: wishlist
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: nostrip
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
Final binaries are still stripped.
If you call dh_strip correctly in debian/rules, this may mean that upstream
is s
Hello,
I'm trying to modify the d-i a bit and my idea is to store netboot files
under a tftp root under a different directory than the official d-i
(debian-installer). I want to choose from a menu during PXE and have
ability to boot e.g. official d-i, modified d-i, debian-live, and other
things. St
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 436340 sid lenny
Bug#436340: Installation freezes during "configure the clock" step
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, lenny
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
muchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Please, let's continue the debugging.
>
> If you say so... Now I removed one hard drive, (with empty partition,
> would be Debian bootable) it still has one hard drive (Win98 bootable).
>
> Should I put the disk back for debugging?
We
Otavio Salvador wrote:
muchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Could be. The only issue that worries me is that it's reproducable at
same place.
It's not very meaningful to buy old memory card to replace in the
old PC, I'll stop this attempt to install Debian on this PC.
Please, let's continue th
muchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote:
>> I downloaded install CD for Ubuntu and Xubuntu,
>> (my plan was to install Debian and Xfce, so Xubuntu is about
>> the same thing, isn't it?)
>>
>> If anything above will succeed, I'll report here.
>>
>
> Xubuntu and Ubuntu installation also failed
> > 3. run as root:
> > im-switch -s scim
> > After a relogin, the user can toggle SCIM on/off by pressing CRTL+SPACE.
> >
> >> "im-switch -s scim" should be done once on the installed system, or at
> >> every boot?
>
> only once at install time. And only if you want to use SCIM as defaul
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:47:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436224: follow-up: installation problem at setting clock
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
[Otavio Salvador]
> It has a list of pciids that a module has support to. Basically is
> what udev uses for probing them. So we might use it to build the
> database of external modules.
Right. then I understand what you mean. And yes, that can be done.
I have earlier used the modules.pcimap fil
I wrote:
I downloaded install CD for Ubuntu and Xubuntu,
(my plan was to install Debian and Xfce, so Xubuntu is about
the same thing, isn't it?)
If anything above will succeed, I'll report here.
Xubuntu and Ubuntu installation also failed.
The memory check utility, which came with Ubuntu in
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Let's start to try to address it in steps. First would be nice if you
could try the daily image[1] and see if it does work for you?
1. http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/mini.iso
Please report what it does solve and not.
I tried to boot from mini
Accepted:
discover-data_2.2007.08.07.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2007.08.07.dsc
discover-data_2.2007.08.07.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2007.08.07.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2007.08.07_all.deb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2007.08.07_all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Glassey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Hi,
>> I think it would be good to discuss this with Debian folks at well to
>> share their expertise and I think these issues should be addressed for
>> lenny as well.
>
> And,
discover-data_2.2007.08.07_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_2.2007.08.07.dsc
discover-data_2.2007.08.07.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2007.08.07_all.deb
discover1-data_2.2007.08.07_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNS
reassign 436340 clock-setup
severity 436340 serious
thanks
> Everything goes fine until clock configuration.
> The installer freezes in the "Setting up the clock" part, when it tries to
> get the time from a network time server. The progress bar reaches 100% and
> nothing happens thereafter.
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 436340 clock-setup
Bug#436340: Installation freezes during "configure the clock" step
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `clock-setup'.
> severity 436340 serious
Bug#436340: Installation freezes during "configure the clock"
Quoting Daniel Glassey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
> I think it would be good to discuss this with Debian folks at well to
> share their expertise and I think these issues should be addressed for
> lenny as well.
And, given that this highly involves packages beings installed by
default, this should
47 matches
Mail list logo
