Hello there. I am not on this list, but will presumedly subscribe
soon for exactly the sort of issue I have today. My company is
working on bundling an internal distribution based on Ubuntu 6.06.1,
which as you likely know uses debian-installer, and many other pieces
of debian directl
>
> Please take this up with the maintainers of lspci and/or the kernel. This
> obviously has nothing to do with the installer.
> I don't see how the D-I team can do anything to help with this.
bug report is reassigned
Cheers
Someone who is still learning to submit a BR against the right packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 422713 pciutils
Bug#422713: lspci does not list anything (etch and dailies)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `pciutils'.
> tags 422713 d-i
Bug#422713: lspci does not list anything (etch and dailies)
There were no tags set.
reassign 422713 pciutils
tags 422713 d-i
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 07 May 2007 22:27, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I tried the Etch MA image and an Etch netboot on a desktop. The
> installer failed to detect the network interface. I think the problem
> lies somewhere in the kernel or in some basic library since lspci did
> not returned any results in DI and al
Package: installation-report
Severity: important
Hello,
I tried the Etch MA image and an Etch netboot on a desktop. The
installer failed to detect the network interface. I think the problem
lies somewhere in the kernel or in some basic library since lspci did
not returned any results in DI and a
reassign 421364 installation-reports
thanks
On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:20, Softlab wrote:
> Package: base-installer
> Status: install ok half-configured
> Priority: required
[...]
Although the syntax is similar, the fields the BTS recognizes is totally
different from the contents of the dpkg s
On Monday 07 May 2007 18:08, Davide Viti wrote:
> > - Should not first a "cleaner" solution be implemented for the fact
> > that the width of the sigils varies? I think subtracting a position
> > currently only "works" because most times the sigil is not 2
> > positions while we do now reserve 2 po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421364 installation-reports
Bug#421364: installation-reports - s390
Bug reassigned from package `base-installer' to `installation-reports'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Op 03-05-2007 om 18:59 schreef Frans Pop:
>
> I can imagine that formal reaction, but OTOH this seems like a general
> kernel incompatibility which they should care about.
> You can be fairly sure that it is _not_ something Debian specific that is
> causing the problem.
Some years ago did get[1
On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Can you give some idea of what would be needed? Some questions I
> > have:
> > - would we still need kbd-chooser, or is there a replacement
>
> We need it only during the first stage; the udebs replace it.
Sorry, but I don't understand this
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 19:01, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > This means that the console maintainers will have to make an
> > > > udeb with loadkeys.
> > >
> > > You mean a udeb from console-tools, named "console-tools-udeb",
> > > with only loadkeys?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > If so, we should file
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:58:26PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 19 April 2007 00:44, Davide Viti wrote:
> > The attached patch makes sure characters surrounding the title are
> > always even (see also #416543).
>
> This is really only a very cosmetic issue.
indeed
> I have some reserva
On Monday 07 May 2007 17:08, Frans Pop wrote:
> priority=low is certainly not required to enter a shell. The easiest
> method is to use from almost any installer screen until you
> get to the main menu and then selecting the "execute a shell" option.
> I've added a sentence in the manual about usi
On Monday 07 May 2007 03:54, Anthony Smith wrote:
> I had to figure out the hard way, that to get to the shells during
> install you have to set debconf priority to low AND BOOT_DEBUG=3any
> other combination failed for me. I repeatedly tried BOOT_DEBUG=3 and
> never saw a menu where I could g
15 matches
Mail list logo
