Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 07:04:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421692: Install report ETCH
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: user-setup
Severity: minor
Some user-setup templates are still named passwd/* as they were inherited
from passwd templates when to abandoned base-config.
It is probably now time to get some consistency and rename these templates
to user-setup/*
Of course, the documentation (particularly
Your message dated Tue, 01 May 2007 21:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421323: fixed in user-setup 1.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
(new) crypto-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.14_s390.udeb extra debian-installer
crypto modules
This package contains crypto modules.
(new) dasd-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.14_s390.udeb standard debian-installer
dasd modules
This package contains dasd modules.
(new) fat-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.14_s3
linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.dsc
linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_1.02_s390.udeb extra debian
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.14_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.14_all.udeb
user-setup_1.14.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.14.dsc
user-setup_1.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.14.tar.gz
user-setup_1.14_all.deb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-s
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.13_all.udeb
user-setup_1.13.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.13.dsc
user-setup_1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.13.tar.gz
user-setup_1.13_all.deb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-s
Matt Funk wrote:
That all seems fine. However, when i boot from the stick dhcp starts but
doesn't seem to get anything. After a while i get:
No boot file name received.
and
operating system missing
Mmmh, maybe i haven't understood correctly but this messages seems to
tell that your system is
user-setup_1.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.14.dsc
user-setup_1.14.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.14_all.udeb
user-setup_1.14_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.dsc
linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.02.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_1.02_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.14_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.14.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.14.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.14_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.14_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.20-1-s3
user-setup_1.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.13.dsc
user-setup_1.13.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.13_all.udeb
user-setup_1.13_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Package: user-setup
Severity: normal
user-setup has code to configure gnome to use sudo, if the system has no
root password, but is missing equivilant setups for kde and xfce. I
assume that both of these need special configs to use sudo for obtaining
root.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: l
On Monday 30 April 2007 23:44, dann frazier wrote:
> Just a note that the next 2.6.8 kernel update for sarge includes an
> ABI change. 2.4.27 updates are coming, but I do not believe the 2.4
> ABI will change.
/me curses, but not very loudly
Ah, well. What's another D-I release...
I really hope
tags 421692 notabug
thanks
The message is as harsh as reality.
Op 30-04-2007 om 21:43 schreef kaba13:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> The initial install refused to active X. After checking the net
> without result I re-installed having the same result without X
> Remembering having read abo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421692 notabug
Unknown tag/s: notabug.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n et
severity 421402 wishlist
reassign 421402 libselinux
tags 421402 d-i
thanks
Op 30-04-2007 om 12:13 schreef Xan:
>
> I only wanted to help detecting some bugs or wishes (if you tag this bug
> as it) for improve debian. If you closed the bug, the bug is alive yet.
Bug triaged.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 421402 wishlist
Bug#421402: Possibility of installing selinux in d-i
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> reassign 421402 libselinux
Bug#421402: Possibility of installing selinux in d-i
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports'
On May 01, Frank Lenaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Searched for similar bugreports and found out that Debian bug #394047 seems
> to resemble it. My system has eth0 (on-board) and eth{1,2,3,4} (a qfe
> card).
Which uses the same MAC address for all interfaces.
Your system sucks, sorry.
You ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421805 udev
Bug#421805: installation-reports: Network setup incorrect after installation
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `udev'.
> tags 421805 moreinfo d-i
Bug#421805: installation-reports: Network setup incorrect after i
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I didn't know about this one; as it is done, it should work, but you
> have to re-run update-gconf-defaults whenever touching the alternative,
> if it is installed.
Yes.
> The problem I can see with the alternative is that you have to set it in
> d-i before libgksu is in
reassign 421805 udev
tags 421805 moreinfo d-i
thanks
Op 01-05-2007 om 13:05 schreef Frank Lenaerts:
>
> Checked /etc/network/interfaces and saw that it contained eth0_rename
> instead of e.g. eth0:
>
> ...
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth0_rename
> iface eth0_rename inet dhcp
> ...
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 14:34 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > You don't have to modify menu entries; gksu can be made to behave like
> > gksudo by setting the /apps/gksu/sudo-modo GConf key.
>
> We're also supposed to be able to do it by updating the
> libgksu-gconf-default
Joey Hess wrote:
> The update-alternatives call in user-setup is supposed to deal with this
> and make gksu use sudo. If it doesn't, user-setup is, I suppose, the
> first thing to look at.
Well, I tried configuring an existing gnome system to use sudo as user-setup
would:
update-alternatives --se
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You don't have to modify menu entries; gksu can be made to behave like
> gksudo by setting the /apps/gksu/sudo-modo GConf key.
We're also supposed to be able to do it by updating the
libgksu-gconf-defaults alternative to point to
/usr/share/libgksu/debian/gconf-defaults.l
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> > > manpower for console handli
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmmm, I fail to understand why this bug is reassigned to user-setup.
>
> Quoting the bug reporter:
>
> because the entry in Gnome Menue is e.g for start Synaptic gksu -u root
> /usr/sbin/synaptic
> but the right way is: gksudo -u root /usr/sbin/synaptic.
>
> That seems
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.29
Severity: normal
Installation of the system was ok but I didn't have a network connection
after the reboot.
Saw the following on the console:
...
SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
eth0_rename: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
eth0_rename
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> > manpower for console handling in D-I is very scarce.
>
> The patch is attached. It activates console-s
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.dsc
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-qemu-di_1.04_mipsel.u
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-r5k-cobalt-di_0.14_mipsel.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.14_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.14_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.14.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.14.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.14_mipsel.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.14_mipsel.udeb
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_1.04_mipsel.udeb
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_1.04
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> manpower for console handling in D-I is very scarce.
The patch is attached. It activates console-setup for the non-Latin
languages as well as for some Lat
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 13:44, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2007 13:37, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:30, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Back from holidays, my daily builds fail. I wonder whether this is
> > > local to my system (running unstable and up-to-date as of
> > > y
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 14:30 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:56, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Hmmm, I fail to understand why this bug is reassigned to user-setup.
> >
> > IIRC this issue has been reported before and we've
Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Frans Pop wrote:
> >> I however wonder whether this bug is indeed "menu entries using 'gksu'
> >> should be corrected to use 'gksudo' when the "sudo way" is chosen in
> >> D-I. That could have been Joeyh's rationale when reassigning the bug.
> >
> > D-I
Sergei Kanevski wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> i have to install debian etch on about 50 computer
Have you looked at preseeding? Coroborated with some options to set the default
mirror and unsigned mirrors, I think you
can do a pretty nice job.
--
Regards,
EddyP
==
Frans Pop wrote:
>> I however wonder whether this bug is indeed "menu entries using 'gksu'
>> should be corrected to use 'gksudo' when the "sudo way" is chosen in
>> D-I. That could have been Joeyh's rationale when reassigning the bug.
>
> D-I is not allowed to modify menu entries like that. If an
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:56, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Hmmm, I fail to understand why this bug is reassigned to user-setup.
>
> IIRC this issue has been reported before and we've reassigned to Gnome
> before, no idea which exact package.
>
> > I howev
(Alastair, it is probably quite important that you first read this
thread in debian-boot. We really might need your involvment)
> The first stage is this: (a) make the Cyrillic languages use
> console-setup instead of console-cyrillic and (b) use console-setup
> for even more languages (such as Vi
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 13:37, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:30, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Back from holidays, my daily builds fail. I wonder whether this is
> > local to my system (running unstable and up-to-date as of yesterday):
>
> Daily builds are fine and a local build here i
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:30, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Back from holidays, my daily builds fail. I wonder whether this is
> local to my system (running unstable and up-to-date as of yesterday):
Daily builds are fine and a local build here is fine too. Must be
something local.
Good luck tracing
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 12:50, Sergei Kanevski wrote:
> I can just choose
> stable/testing/unstable and then comes abort. I can only see on tty4
> "Release file unsigned".
Try booting the installer with the option:
debian-installer/allow_unauthenticated=true
Cheers,
FJP
pgpDu4wP9eXKm.pgp
Hallo,
i have to install debian etch on about 50 computer and i have a weak internet
connection. With Potato,Woody,Sarge i used to copy the DVD/CD content to one
local HD, offer that directory via http/ftp and after pxe-boot i could point
to my http/ftp server as install source mirror. Now
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:56, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmmm, I fail to understand why this bug is reassigned to user-setup.
IIRC this issue has been reported before and we've reassigned to Gnome
before, no idea which exact package.
> I however wonder whether this bug is indeed "menu entries us
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:04:46PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> > - how are the various architectures supported
>
> Currently they are not supported well due to problems with the X
> keyboard data.
Today I notice that the X upstream has made changes that perhaps solve
the problems and it is
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> > reassign 421323 user-setup
> Bug#421323: Bug in Debian expertgui installer
> Bug reassigned from package `debian-instal
48 matches
Mail list logo
