Bug#405098: It's been a while

2007-03-24 Thread Adam Porter
Regretfully, it's been too long since I encountered this bug for me to provide additional information. Feel free to close it if you think that's appropriate. pgpkF27wGauYX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#416127: apt-get download error during a network installation

2007-03-24 Thread Huang Zhen
Package: installation-reports Boot method: network Image version: http://debian.cn99.com/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current/images/ netboot/mini.iso Date: 2007-03-24 Machine: VMWare Workstation 5.5.3 Processor: Pentium M 1.7G Memory: host:1280M guest:256M Partitions: Output of lspci

Bug#394868: Is this worth mentioning in the D-I errata?

2007-03-24 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
Just following up, no one seemed to comment on this bug, so I presume it's not been fixed, but I think it would be handy to mention in the D-I errata or install notes to prevent others being bitten by this problem. Helpfully, the errata says that to get things added to the errata, you need to file

Bug#416071: marked as done (Etch d-i RC2)

2007-03-24 Thread Eddy Petrișor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Saturday 24 March 2007 17:28, Michael Numberger wrote: >> On a AMD K7-650 (Slot A), the RC2-Installer installs the >> linux-image-2.6-486 an not the linux-Image-2.6-k7. > > You probably used a netinst CD image. That CD image just does not contai

Bug#416119: marked as done (installation-guide-i386: use qemu to "test" you'll reboot correctly (limited use))

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:00:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416119: installation-guide-i386: use qemu to "test" you'll reboot correctly (limited use) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#416119: installation-guide-i386: use qemu to "test" you'll reboot correctly (limited use)

2007-03-24 Thread Thiemo Seufer
supaplex wrote: > Package: installation-guide-i386 > Severity: wishlist > > FWIW, I used qemu to test my remote install of debian will boot > correctly. There are some outstanding issues with this line of thought. > However, for those that want to persue this, it can be a comfort to have > a high

Bug#416117: marked as done (installation-guide-i386: mention alternate releases for more help)

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:17:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416117: installation-guide-i386: mention alternate releases for more help has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules

2007-03-24 Thread peter green
> There is no mention of updating /etc/modules. Without a network driver, > or something else equally critical, you may find your remote dedicated > box happily running while noone can ssh into it. afaict nowadays /etc/modules isn't really nessacery anymore and can even cause upgrade problems. I

Bug#416119: installation-guide-i386: use qemu to "test" you'll reboot correctly (limited use)

2007-03-24 Thread supaplex
Package: installation-guide-i386 Severity: wishlist FWIW, I used qemu to test my remote install of debian will boot correctly. There are some outstanding issues with this line of thought. However, for those that want to persue this, it can be a comfort to have a high degree of confidence the syst

Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules

2007-03-24 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 416115 installation-guide severity 416115 minor thanks On Sunday 25 March 2007 00:53, supaplex wrote: > There is no mention of updating /etc/modules. Without a network > driver, or something else equally critical, you may find your remote > dedicated box happily running while noone can s

Processed: Re: Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 416115 installation-guide Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules Bug reassigned from package `installation-guide-i386' to `installation-guide'. > severity 416115 minor Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules Severity set to `min

Bug#416118: Installation report

2007-03-24 Thread Litvinov Vadim
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: 22.03.2007 Machine: Packard Bell EasyNote E6 Partitions: Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4864 cyli

Bug#416113: installation-guide-i386: debootstrap pitfalls; install-grub+FC4 disk labels

2007-03-24 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 416113 grub thanks On Sunday 25 March 2007 00:44, supaplex wrote: > grub-install chokes in /etc/mtab if there is a disk label. From comments on IRC I understand that this was a debootstrap installation from an existing Fedora Core system, not a D-I installation. IMO this falls in the ca

Processed: Re: Bug#416113: installation-guide-i386: debootstrap pitfalls; install-grub+FC4 disk labels

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 416113 grub Bug#416113: installation-guide-i386: debootstrap pitfalls; install-grub+FC4 disk labels Bug reassigned from package `installation-guide-i386' to `grub'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#416117: installation-guide-i386: mention alternate releases for more help

2007-03-24 Thread supaplex
Package: installation-guide-i386 Severity: wishlist While I was following the Sarge guide to begin with, I discovered better details in newer releases of the install guide (debootstrap section). It might be helpful for others to "consider" any newer release of the documentation to gain insights if

Bug#416115: pitfal: no mention of /etc/modules

2007-03-24 Thread supaplex
Package: installation-guide-i386 Severity: important There is no mention of updating /etc/modules. Without a network driver, or something else equally critical, you may find your remote dedicated box happily running while noone can ssh into it. Slight overkill: # awk '{print $1}' < /proc/module

Processed: change my mail address

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # daniel.leidert.spam[at]gmx.net > submitter 364535 ! Bug#364535: Buggy /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual line 16 Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 364837 ! Bug#364837: Seg

Bug#416113: installation-guide-i386: debootstrap pitfalls; install-grub+FC4 disk labels

2007-03-24 Thread supaplex
Package: installation-guide-i386 Severity: important grub-install chokes in /etc/mtab if there is a disk label. After some research, something suggested I cp /proc/mounts /etc/mtab. I think this is where the problem was introduced first for me. There was an existing FC4 install with /boot on /dev

Re: ipso withdrew

2007-03-24 Thread TVivian PFenton
Our Last pick Doubled in 48 hours Get in on Energy Bottom Critical Care New SYM-C-C-T-I Cannot go wrong at 20 cents Short or long, this one cant go wrong This is a Real Business not a fly by night Get in Monday, Don't Regret later!! Louis Bullock in what the NCAA said was the largest financial

Bug#415989: Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt

2007-03-24 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 24-03-2007 om 18:56 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Le Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:22:38 +0100, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a > écrit: > >The message > >>Install base system : Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt > >should have been reported by more people if it really is damaged. >

Bug#415989: Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt

2007-03-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:22:38 +0100, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Op 24-03-2007 om 17:59 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:21:45 +0100, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: >Op 23-03-2007 om 19:41 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >>Install base system : De

Bug#276590: marked as done (painful alpha install)

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:40:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing very old report on alpha install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#415989: Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt

2007-03-24 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 24-03-2007 om 17:59 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Le Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:21:45 +0100, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a > écrit: > >Op 23-03-2007 om 19:41 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> > >>Install base system : Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt > >> > > > >And from which

Bug#416078: installation-report

2007-03-24 Thread Paul van der Vlis
package: installation-reports > Boot method: CD > Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 17-Mar-2007 21:47 > Date: 24-3-2007 > Machine: Student PC (230 euro) > Processor: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2600+ > Memory: 256 MB -

Processed: retitle 415989 to Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 415989 Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt Bug#415989: (no subject) Changed Bug title to Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt from (no subject). > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#416071: marked as done (Etch d-i RC2)

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416071: Etch d-i RC2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Processed: Re: Bug#416071: Etch d-i RC2

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 416071 installation-reports Bug#416071: Etch d-i RC2 Warning: Unknown package 'installer' Bug reassigned from package `installer' to `installation-reports'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#416071: Etch d-i RC2

2007-03-24 Thread Michael Numberger
Package: Installer Version: Etch RC2 it seems, there is a bug in the Etch-Installer RC2: On a AMD K7-650 (Slot A), the RC2-Installer installs the linux-image-2.6-486 an not the linux-Image-2.6-k7. Goodbye Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: r45997 - in trunk/packages/installation-report: debian finish-install.d

2007-03-24 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote: > * Merge from Ubuntu: > - Save /target/var/lib/dpkg/status to > /target/var/log/installer/initial-status.gz; suggested by Jason > Whitlark. I'm uncertian of what the benefits of doing this are, at least for Debian. After the install, the dpkg status will only be chan

Processed: reassign

2007-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 394868 grub-installer Bug#394868: highpoint/grub conflict detection would be nice Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Re: unable to install etch ( "all-generic-ide" )

2007-03-24 Thread reju rajeev
Hi Don, Its perfect now... Thanks for your great help . Regards Reju Rajeev On 3/20/07, Don Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:33:46 +0530, "reju rajeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, >I succeed in installing with generic.all_generic_ide=1, but after the >installation

Please allow discover1 version 1.7.20 into etch

2007-03-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Yesterday I uploaded a new version of discover1 into unstable. It fixes a bug in video card detection, where it would detect a TV card as a video card and break X autodetection because of this (bug #415620). I also fixed a few low-hanging fruits, and closed a few bugs fixed in earlier versions.