Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 414516 partman
Bug#414516: debian-installer: RAID/crypto/USB problems
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Мэйловая реклама по нашим базам
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2ВОСЕМЬ9-584-274
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 415017 installation-reports
Bug#415017: Hosts from /etc/hosts does not resolve
Warning: Unknown package 'installation-repors'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-repors
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 415017 installation-repors
Bug#415017: Hosts from /etc/hosts does not resolve
Warning: Unknown package 'installation-repors'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 415079 important
Bug#415079: installation-reports: etch-RC2 install hangs on sparcstation 20
while detecting other hardware
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End o
Package: installation-reports
Version: etch-RC2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-sparc/rc2/images/sparc32/netboot/2.6/boot.img
Date: Wed Mar 14 21:25:4
Subject: installation-report: Mostly successful amd64-kde install on Intel
P965/ICH8 chipset with JMicron IDE
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.29
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian GNU/Linux t
Hi,
I just got a Dell box and want to do a fresh Debian network install on
it. It currently has Windows Vista on it.
The box has a Nvidia nForce Sata controller and according to Nvidia
the linux driver for it is called sata_nv and has been included in all
linux distributions for the last couple
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:30:25 +0530, "reju rajeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ref : mail sent to debian-boot on 2006-12-11
>Sir,
>The problem still exists .. i tried latest daily build . missing cdrom
>during installation.
>
>attaching the previous mail sent
>
>*Author: *reju rajeev <[EMAIL PROTE
> get as far as checking ide that takes it's time but moves on to checking
> scsi then hangs and won't go any further 91% is shown and there the machine
> hangs indefinatly
What D-I image were you using?
Was this an image downloaded from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer?
Or was
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:44, Colin Watson wrote:
Personally I also feel that all possible solutions effectively make
/etc/fstab unreadable and unmaintainable.
The approach we took in Ubuntu was to put comments above each UUID
entry in /etc/fs
I download today's boot.img.gz and debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso and
tried again. Same failure.
More exactly the failure message is failed to mount /. This comes after
formatting is complete.
My apologies. I failed to notice the scroll down to Abort. This worked
OK and after I restored
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 415020 installation-reports
Bug#415020: installation: gdm, kdm fail to login after selecting choosewm and
several window managers.
Warning: Unknown package 'installation'
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `installation-reports'.
>
On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:44, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Personally I also feel that all possible solutions effectively make
> > /etc/fstab unreadable and unmaintainable.
>
> The approach we took in Ubuntu was to put comments above each UUID
> entry in /etc/fstab documenting which traditional devic
Package: installation
Severity: important
Initial login after install worked fine. After running synaptic and
adding kdm, wdm, choosewm, and several window managers (enlightenment
in particular), gnome and kde couldn't login. Neither gdm nor kdm
displayed options for window managers--why? Fin
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: grub-installer
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Any reason why we shouldn't check for amd64 here ? (other than 64-bit Macs
> not yet being in the market)
(Huh? Core 2 Duo-based MacBooks are 64-bit and available.)
I in
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:22:03PM -, peter green wrote:
> for most users fstab has always identified by rough position (e.g.
> hda=ide primary master), changing to a system based on partition IDs
> would mean a lot of relearning for admins (e.g. its no longer ok to
> backup a partition by ddi
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:49:02PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Colin has said a few times that he consideres the Ubuntu solution not
> clean enough for Debian.
If I said that I misspoke; I only meant that it's not settled enough for
Etch at this point. As I indicated on #debian-boot yesterday, I do
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version:
Date:
Machine: home build amd xp2600 on an asus a7n8x-e delux 80gb sata drive geforce
6600gt ac97 sound
Memory:
Partitions: maxtor sata drive not able to detect during scsi detection phase
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base Syste
Ref : mail sent to debian-boot on 2006-12-11
Sir,
The problem still exists .. i tried latest daily build . missing cdrom
during installation.
attaching the previous mail sent
*Author: *reju rajeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Date: *2006-12-11 10:592006-12-11 05:29 +5.530UTC
*To: *debian-boot
*CC: *re
Resubmitted as I was advised no response is possible to my normal email
address as it contains the word mail.
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Booted from a USB Drive
Image version:
www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
Date: 2007-03-14 1600
Machine: Assembled from
component
A million thanks to Steve - I managed to complete my install a few weeks
ago using steps 1-4 outlined in my second post (9 Jan), and then the
following steps of Steve's:
- Skipped over the failing lilo, let it finish and eject the CD, flipped
over to VT2 to finish the install by hand.
(I'm not su
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:39:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414967: D-I RC2 netinstall image successfully installed on
iMac G5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:34:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414880: D-I RC2 netinstall image fails to install on iMac
G5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:19:11AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Someone which uses scsi-over-fc have much better identification, the wwnn,
> > which is used in by-id:
> So it's used in by-id, but not in by-path, right? Hence this is still an
> argument against by-path.
No, similar identifiers
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:57:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > >, it changes if you change the SCSI/IDE bus address
> > > > of the drive
> > > the same applied in the old hd? and sd? days, drives names changing when
> > > you c
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:56:48PM +0530, Praveen A a écrit :
2007/3/14, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CD/DVD images are available from:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
I would like to check if everything is OK on iMac G5, which image shall
I use ?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:57:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >, it changes if you change the SCSI/IDE bus address
> > > of the drive
> > the same applied in the old hd? and sd? days, drives names changing when
> > you change thier IDE/SCSI ids is something admins expect and are used to.
> Um
28 matches
Mail list logo
