Bug#397973: Patch for partman-md

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
And here's the patch for partman-md to ensure that flags are exclusive where reasonable... -- David Härdeman Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (revision 45641) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pa

Bug#413183: Patch

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
Here's the patch to make sure that superfluous flags are not set. -- David Härdeman Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (revision 45633) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +partman-lvm (52) UNRELEASED;

Bug#397973: parted: Fix mac partition table corruption

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:14:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:47:04AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: diff -ur ./parted-1.7.1.orig/libparted/labels/mac.c ./parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c --- ./parted-1.7.1.orig/libparted/labels/mac.c 2006-05-25 19:28:55.0

Processed: Clone 397973

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 397973 -1 -2 Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag to partitions. Bug 397973 cloned as bugs 413183-413184. > severity 397973 normal Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid

Bug#397973: parted: Fix mac partition table corruption

2007-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:47:04AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: > diff -ur ./parted-1.7.1.orig/libparted/labels/mac.c > ./parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c > --- ./parted-1.7.1.orig/libparted/labels/mac.c2006-05-25 > 19:28:55.0 +0200 > +++ ./parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c

Bug#397973: parted: Fix mac partition table corruption

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
The attached patch changes libparted so that it doesn't corrupt the mac parition table when flags that alter the system_name entry are set/unset. This fixes the error for me (using a mac partition table on a i386 machine). Some minor fixes remain in partman-md and partman-lvm (lvm, swap and r

aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: aboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.udeb to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.udeb Overr

Processing of aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.changes

2007-03-02 Thread Archive Administrator
aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.25_alpha.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Bug#412903: install-report

2007-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:42, Παναγιώτης Παπασωτηρίου wrote: > Comments/Problems: > PROBLEM WITH SATA DISK DRIVES: Installation failed at first try; the > installer booted from the CD as expected, and installation went ok > until the "Install base system" phase. Strangely enough, I was not a

Bug#400966: Patch, security

2007-03-02 Thread Filipus Klutiero
I'm submitting the following patch, result of many corrections thanks to tests on all release architectures and kfreebsd-i386. Seriously, this is an untested patch which I think is quite important to apply for Etch. We released Sarge without the PHP version recommended by upstream, and thankful

Bug#413060: marked as done ((no subject))

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:09:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413060: (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#410328: installation-reports: Successful install

2007-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 02 March 2007 22:01, Celejar wrote: > I'm just curious - is there a technical reason that this can't be done, > or is it just too much work for the install team? No hard technical reason. Maybe it will be implemented at some point, but I doubt it will ever be a priority. -- To UNSUBS

Bug#410143: marked as done (Dell XPS M1210 laptop installation report)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:55:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410143: Dell XPS M1210 laptop installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#410122: marked as done ()

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:51:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410122: has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#410105: marked as done ()

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:44:28 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410105:installation-report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#410087: marked as done (SATA+PATA on MS-6728 Neo2 865PE leads to oops on boot)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:40:06 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410087: SATA+PATA on MS-6728 Neo2 865PE leads to oops on boot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#410065: installation-report: d-i rc1, NSLU2: minor network-console and boot issues

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-07 08:38]: > I first tried the di-nslu2.bin image from the installer nightly > builds, as of midday 2007-02-03. The kernel sitting next to the > image was marked as 2.6.18-4 so I assume it was new enough that it > ought to have had a working network

Bug#410041: marked as done (Install fails on VIA VT8251-based SATA controller)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:29:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410041: Install fails on VIA VT8251-based SATA controller has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#410022: marked as done (installation report)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:26:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410022: installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#409965: marked as done (installation-report SUN Ultra 10)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:13:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409965: installation-report SUN Ultra 10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#409951: marked as done (installation fails)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:07:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409951: installation fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#409886: marked as done (Installation report)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:04:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409886: Installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#409716: marked as done (Successful base-install on Mac Cube 450)

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:59:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409716: Successful base-install on Mac Cube 450 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#394344: another Marvell Technology 11ab:6101 PATA Controller (support all-generic-ide)

2007-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 03 February 2007 17:49, Jacob L. Anawalt wrote: > I mean that I have been using pata_marvell.c in linux-2.6.19-rc1-mm1 in > the system I first tested with in October 2006. The pata_marvell.c > driver has been working for me, so I didn't need to wait for Marvell to > do the honours. Actu

Re: Preseeding with no swap partition

2007-03-02 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 01-03-2007 om 17:10 schreef Durk Strooisma: > Hi all, > > Does anybody know of a way to preseed the question "Do you want to return to > the partitioning menu" when no swap space was defined? > > Any value for "d-i partman-basicfilesystems/no_swap boolean" makes d-i enter > a loop... Maybe the

Re: we differ, lets care about the common interrests

2007-03-02 Thread Geert Stappers
> > I was sad that you chose not to meet with me at FOSDEM, and that when i > greeted you in the hall outside the debian room, you chose to ignore me and > pass by me looking the other was, as well as the way you chose to refuse to > participate in the discussion concerning my ideas for the kernel

Bug#410328: installation-reports: Successful install

2007-03-02 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:22:36 +0100 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > 4) About the guided partitioning - as far as I could make out from the > > prompts, lvm was only an option if I gave the installer the whole disk, > > which I couldn't do, so I settled for regular guided partitioni

Re: Filesystem type survives formatting in debian installer?

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote: On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:59:01AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: On Fri, March 2, 2007 1:17, Josef Wolf said: > The error occures on the first reboot (before any of my scripts > mentioned above come into the game). > > fsck.ext3: Unabl

Processed: RE: Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 412982 Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 412982 gnome Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in i

Bug#412948: Bug 412948 - crypto and RAID

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
reassign 412948 partman-md forcemerge 412948 393728 thanks Hi, and thanks for your bug report. Unfortunately the combination of crypto and RAID is known to be buggy (see bug reports #393728, #398464, #407905, #397872). Unfortunately it also seems unlikely that this will be fixed before the r

Processed: Bug 412948 - crypto and RAID

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 412948 partman-md Bug#412948: Bug in Etch debian-installer Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-md'. > forcemerge 412948 393728 Bug#412948: Bug in Etch debian-installer Bug#393728: dm-crypt on raid does not play nicel

Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks

2007-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 02 March 2007 20:24, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 3/2/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:17, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > When you enable sudo in the installer (via expert mode), a password > > > for the root user isn't set. Then, if you (for exam

Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks

2007-03-02 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 3/2/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Gnome date/time applet asks for the root password. The user > password doesn't work. Well, you could have been a bit more clear about what "it" was then. How were we supposed to guess this was about a Gnome applet? Yes, sorry. The 'desktop

Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks

2007-03-02 Thread peter green
reopen 412982 reassign 412982 gnome thanks > The Gnome date/time applet asks for the root password. The user > password doesn't work. this sounds like a gnome bug then, it really should be able to handle the case with the root account disabled but sudo availible.

Bug#412982: installation-reports: Enabling 'sudo' in installer skips setting root password and breaks desktop root tasks

2007-03-02 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 3/2/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:17, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > When you enable sudo in the installer (via expert mode), a password for > the root user isn't set. Then, if you (for example) want to adjust date > & time, it asks for the root password, wh

Processed: Re: Bug#413065: Debian Installer doesn't change partition types

2007-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 413065 installation-reports Bug#413065: Debian Installer doesn't change partition types Warning: Unknown package 'd-i' Bug reassigned from package `d-i' to `installation-reports'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#413065: Debian Installer doesn't change partition types

2007-03-02 Thread Mohammed Hagag
Package: d-i Version: testing when installing debian testing [ 2 monthes old version ] and formating non-linux partitions to be the root / the installer doesn't convert the partition type to Linux and grub will not install if the target partition was NTFS for example. i don't know if this proble

Re: Filesystem type survives formatting in debian installer?

2007-03-02 Thread Josef Wolf
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:59:01AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: > On Fri, March 2, 2007 1:17, Josef Wolf said: > > The error occures on the first reboot (before any of my scripts > > mentioned above come into the game). > > > > fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve 'UUID=x' > > fsck died with ex

Bug#380226: NTFS (partition) not recreated correctly after resize:incorrect start sector

2007-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 02 March 2007 03:11, Ben Hutchings wrote: > What is the intended difference in semantics between RESIZE_PARTITION > and VIRTUAL_RESIZE_PARTITION? In the resize_partition() function these > are distinguished by the open_filesystem flag which implied to me that > in the latter case we woul

Re: Filesystem type survives formatting in debian installer?

2007-03-02 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, March 2, 2007 1:17, Josef Wolf said: > The error occures on the first reboot (before any of my scripts > mentioned above come into the game). > > fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve 'UUID=x' > fsck died with exit status 8 If you get this error on the first reboot, then you have alread