Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:41:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411196:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:45:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411195:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
On Saturday 17 February 2007 03:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:46:22AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > I may be talking nonsense but would it make sense to advise people to
> > install sarge and then upgrade to etch until RC2?
>
> No.
And also, there is absolutely nothing w
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version: < http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/>
Date:
Machine: <(SUN Fire X4200)>
Processor: AMD Opteron 200 series
Memory: 4GB
Partitions:
df -Tl:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/d
Package: installation-reports
Version: daily build 20061102
Severity: important
Boot method: CD
Image version:
debian/dists/etch/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc64/netboot/mini.iso
Date: Feburary 15, 2007
Machine: IBM p5-520
Partitions:
Partition Table for /dev/sda
Fi
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:46:22AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (16/02/07 21:56), Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2007 21:07, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > As testing is currently unusable anyway, I've decided to start the
> > > migration of udebs to testing, as a slow preparation for RC2.
On (16/02/07 21:56), Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 21:07, Frans Pop wrote:
> > As testing is currently unusable anyway, I've decided to start the
> > migration of udebs to testing, as a slow preparation for RC2.
I may be talking nonsense but would it make sense to advise people to
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 3.1r4
Date: 5:00 PM CST (GMT-06:00) February 16 2007
Machine: HP Pavilion dv6040us
Processor: Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Memory: 2GB
Partitions: 120GB, NTFS
Output of lspci and lspci -n: unavailable
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initia
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 3.1r4
Date: 5:00 PM CST (GMT-06:00) February 16 2007
Machine: HP Pavilion dv6040us
Processor: Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Memory: 2GB
Partitions: 120GB, NTFS
Output of lspci and lspci -n: unavailable
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initia
Hello. Is anyone here familiar with the backported d-i images at
http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/? I've got the installation working, mostly,
but the base-config/early_command and base-config/late_command that
I use with the standard sarge installer aren't being run. Does anyone
know if the kmuto.jp in
Accepted:
download-installer_1.14_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/net-retriever/download-installer_1.14_all.udeb
net-retriever_1.14.dsc
to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_1.14.dsc
net-retriever_1.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_1.14.tar.gz
net-retriever_1.14_all.udeb
t
Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410819: fixed in base-installer 1.73
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
net-retriever_1.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
net-retriever_1.14.dsc
net-retriever_1.14.tar.gz
net-retriever_1.14_all.udeb
download-installer_1.14_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Accepted:
base-installer_1.73.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.73.dsc
base-installer_1.73.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.73.tar.gz
base-installer_1.73_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.73_i386.udeb
Override entries for your pa
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.50_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.50_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.50.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.50.dsc
rootskel_1.50.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.50.tar.gz
rootskel_1.50_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.5
base-installer_1.73_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.73.dsc
base-installer_1.73.tar.gz
base-installer_1.73_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
rootskel_1.50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.50.dsc
rootskel_1.50.tar.gz
rootskel_1.50_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.50_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Friday 16 February 2007 21:07, Frans Pop wrote:
> As testing is currently unusable anyway, I've decided to start the
> migration of udebs to testing, as a slow preparation for RC2.
Right, so here goes.
1) Feel free to remove loop-aes-modules from testing.
2) Hints for packages providing udebs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier kirjoitti:
>> Tapio said he'd also accept the original translation change
>> (Suomeksi->Suomi) if it is wanted, and no-one has yet commented on the
> Yes, but he also stated that "Suomi" has his preference
Actually, he did not. "Suom
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'd appreciate some advise/suggestions about the bug report below.
>
> I agree with Francesco that Debian does not necessarily promote "the
> ideals of the Free Software _Foundation_". However, others are
> probably more aware of the historical context.
>
>
Due to the expiration of the 2006 key, the RC1 D-I and CD images, and also
the weekly CDs have become mostly unusable.
Doing a D-I release without a kernel that is at least intended to be
released with Etch available in testing is a pointless exercise, however
leaving users without any full CD/D
> Tapio said he'd also accept the original translation change
> (Suomeksi->Suomi) if it is wanted, and no-one has yet commented on the
Yes, but he also stated that "Suomi" has his preference
> idea of using lower-case for those languages that use such themselves
> for language names, so why close
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.jigdo
Date: Feb. 14. 2007
Machine: Acer Aspire 3610
Processor: Intel Celeron M
Memory: 512M
Partitions:
df -Tl:
/dev/hda4 ext31730706
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 410354
Bug#410354: [patch] Correct translation for the "Finnish" language
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Debian Bug Tracking System kirjoitti:
> After reading all contributions, I think that Tapio is the Authority
> here and, therefore, I close this bug report.
Tapio said he'd also accept the original translation change
(Suomeksi->Suomi) if it is wanted, and no-one has yet commented on the
idea of us
Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:31:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410354: Suomi vs. Suomeksi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
> Christian,
>
> If that is all correct, then I assume this has never actually been
> properly tested as that would mean setting the default to the
> language-specific question can never have worked...
Honestly, I absolutely don't remember. From memory I would say that,
back in the times I wrot
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.31
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if it were possible to disable autonegociation and force
the media type from netcfg. It is not uncommon with switches that ports
are forced to 100baseTx-FD because autoneg just works badly. In such
cases, the card with autoneg enab
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The request of displaying the MAC address can be argued about.
I got a usecase yesterday for this: a dual port ethernet card.
Same label, and no way to know which interface is which. (and with
#248061 not fixed, it doesn't help).
O
There's already a "WHAT is Debian?" in intro/about. It doesn't talk
about about promoting anything, and I think that's fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 18:16, Francesco Poli wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 410317 + pending
Bug#410317: installation-guide: links to be fixed in section 1.2 _What is
GNU/Linux?_
There were no tags set.
Tags added
I'd appreciate some advise/suggestions about the bug report below.
I agree with Francesco that Debian does not necessarily promote "the
ideals of the Free Software _Foundation_".
However, others are probably more aware of the historical context.
I am also unsure if replacing that by "ideals of F
Hi,
Mario Lang, le Fri 16 Feb 2007 14:23:31 +0100, a écrit :
> Willy, are you still willing to help the speakup project to do the final
> cleaning up so that mainline submission could happen?
I wouldn't say "final": the way speakup access serial ports is to be
completely rethought. The current w
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:14:04AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 February 2007 23:53, Gilles Casse wrote:
>> > Today, in principle using a Speakup enabled kernel + Speechd-Up +
>> > SpeechDispatcher + eSpeak or in user space, Yasr + emacspeak
On Friday 16 February 2007 12:21, Frans Pop wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/packages/localechooser/debian/changelog
>trunk/packages/localechooser/localechooser
> Log:
> Fix default for shortlists from locale preseeding by setting the
> default on the shortlist question itself, rather than on the
Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:20:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410971: interactive aptitude wants to remove hfsutils and
sudo after etch installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411082 + pending
Bug#411082: locale preseeding doesn't work for country
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Package: kernel-image-2.6.18-3-486
Version:
everything else: see attachted plain text file, as created by the reportbug tool
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.18-3-486: frequent "invalid opcode" calls cause crashes
Package: kernel-image-2.6.18-3-486
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below
On Friday 16 February 2007 06:44, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I buy this, indeed. It is imho really important that users
> understand that they are indeed choosing a *language* first.
I haven't seen those strings in use elsewhere than in places where it is
clearly told that "choose your language".
39 matches
Mail list logo
