Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:43:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395452: [ia64] HP rx2600 w/ 20061025 daily
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
hey, i figured out my burning error now dealing wi t h trying to start my
graphical environment. i only downloaded the base system so im not even sure
if its on there. perhaps you know the command to installing the x
environment? thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System)
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:03:29AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 19:39, you wrote:
> > Did you see the new version i attached :
>
> No, initially I did not see this. Reason is simple: I had already applied
> your original patch and closed the BR, so I looked in the origina
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Boot to CD
Image version: 10-21-2006. Image from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd
Date: October 21, 2006. Various attempts between 7pm and 9:30pm PST
Machine: "parts" machine - MSI MS-6300 motherboard
Processor: AMD Duron 95
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version: 20061025 daily
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:04:11 -0600
Machine: HP rx2600
Processor: Itanium II (ia64)
Memory: 12G
Partitions:
debian:~# df -Tl
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 ext3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 395411 normal
Bug#395411: debian-installer: [daily 20061026] fails to set up route + fails to
see mirrors
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Thursday 26 October 2006 21:04, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, Frans, please step back into reality.
>
> I filled a correct patch back then, which i had tested and everything.
> This patch did not get applied, but modified slightly by Colin or you
> or whoever, which resulted in d-i being utterly brok
On Thursday 26 October 2006 19:39, you wrote:
> Did you see the new version i attached :
No, initially I did not see this. Reason is simple: I had already applied
your original patch and closed the BR, so I looked in the original bug
report instead of in your new mail. Is that my mistake, maybe.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Hi,
> #
> # Now that the BTS supports version-tracking, bugs that were
> # fixed in NMUs but never acknowledged can be marked as
> # closed in the relevant version. In the case of the bugs listed
> # below, they're marked as release-critical in the ve
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:47:54 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Comments/Problems:
> Mit dem Gui installer konnte das Zeichen @ bei der Proxy Server Angabe
> nicht eingeben werden. Habe das Zeichen @ vom Beispiel
> (http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port) kopiert und eingefügt. Das
> Tastaturlayout
> Swi
Frans Pop wrote:
> I still think your setup is what's broken here. Why would you want outside
> DNS resolution if you can't reach anywhere anyway?
FWIW I once saw such a setup used so that logresolve could be used.
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Hm. If you installed the gnome metapackage with aptitude,
> > then the dependencies would be marked 'auto' and re
Accepted:
glantank-installer_0.5_arm.udeb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-installer_0.5_arm.udeb
glantank-utils_0.5_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-utils_0.5_arm.deb
glantank_0.5.dsc
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.5.dsc
glantank_0.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.5
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
glantank-installer_0.5_arm.udeb: package says priority is standard, override
says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
aboot-installer_0.0.23.dsc
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.23.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.23.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.23_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.23_alpha.udeb
Overr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
While translating I have taken some notes about weird things found in
the original version of the manual and marked them with XXX in the PO
file. Below is the (trimmed) result of "$ grep -A10 XXX *.po".
using-d-i.po:# XXX: isn't it "DEC stati
aboot-installer_0.0.23_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aboot-installer_0.0.23.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.23.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.23_alpha.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: prevents install
Downloaded the daily etch netinst ISO image from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Booted fine on a ThinkPad T42, detected CD drive and built-in
glantank_0.5_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glantank_0.5.dsc
glantank_0.5.tar.gz
glantank-utils_0.5_arm.deb
glantank-installer_0.5_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:05:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> > That said, please also apply the first hunk of the attached patch,
> > which bumps the check to 1.4, as my colegues released a 1.3 firmware
> > from an older tree, and i had to bum
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:33:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> > That said, please also apply the first hunk of the attached patch,
> > which bumps the check to 1.4, as my colegues released a 1.3 firmware
> > from an older tree, and i had to bum
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
Op 24-10-2006 om 22:17 schreef Geert Stappers:
> Hello,
>
> Following http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> on the weekly builds did bring me
> to http://ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/
> where all file dates are 10-Oct-2006.
>
> Assuming it is an known issue,
> whe
Your message dated Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:26:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394915: installation-guide: it is now possible, to
partition RAID through preseeding
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:27:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395300: installation-guide: New disk partitioner changed
menu entries, guide needs updating
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Accepted:
lilo-installer_1.18.dsc
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.18.dsc
lilo-installer_1.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.18.tar.gz
lilo-installer_1.18_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.18_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your
Accepted:
grub-installer_1.19.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.19.dsc
grub-installer_1.19.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.19.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.19_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.19_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your
lilo-installer_1.18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lilo-installer_1.18.dsc
lilo-installer_1.18.tar.gz
lilo-installer_1.18_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
grub-installer_1.19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.19.dsc
grub-installer_1.19.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.19_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Accepted:
vmelilo-installer_1.12.dsc
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.12.dsc
vmelilo-installer_1.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.12.tar.gz
vmelilo-installer_1.12_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.12_m68k.udeb
O
vmelilo-installer_1.12_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vmelilo-installer_1.12.dsc
vmelilo-installer_1.12.tar.gz
vmelilo-installer_1.12_m68k.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Accepted:
partman-prep_9.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_9.dsc
partman-prep_9.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_9.tar.gz
partman-prep_9_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_9_powerpc.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-prep_9.dsc - so
On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> That said, please also apply the first hunk of the attached patch,
> which bumps the check to 1.4, as my colegues released a 1.3 firmware
> from an older tree, and i had to bump the version of the version with
> the correct disk numbering.
Pl
Accepted:
partman-newworld_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_15.dsc
partman-newworld_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_15.tar.gz
partman-newworld_15_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_15_powerpc.udeb
Override entries
partman-prep_9_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-prep_9.dsc
partman-prep_9.tar.gz
partman-prep_9_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
partman-newworld_15_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-newworld_15.dsc
partman-newworld_15.tar.gz
partman-newworld_15_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> That said, please also apply the first hunk of the attached patch,
> which bumps the check to 1.4, as my colegues released a 1.3 firmware
> from an older tree, and i had to bump the version of the version with
> the correct disk numbering.
No
Your message dated Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:27:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395230: installation-reports: [sparc64] ultra10 creator 3d
install failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Rick Thomas wrote:
Note the difference in dates of the .iso files...
The images are different too as the MD5SUM files can tell you.
Something strange is happening. Is it a Halloween prank?
Looks like the ftp server already has the new images that have only just
been b
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
preparing.po has
Manually edit partition table
,
but the installer no longer has this menuitem. I guess there are
several cases like this, guide needs to get the new menuitems texts
from the installer. The partition code seemed to get a heavy re-wr
We are living in a time of resource, and those with the
mineral wealth are those with the power and money.
belongings, oil, gold; all at record highs. It's where you need to be.
Our next feature has achieve that position, and is now
starting heavy mass publicity to let anyone know it.
This c0mpan
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:25:33AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 23:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It seems that nobootloader uses still devfs paths for some reason. The
> > following line :
>
> That is not so strange as that line is using the exact same variable
> $bootfs_de
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:57:10PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Please try booting with 'video=atyfb:off' boot parameter.
Thanks, that worked. Install is proceeding.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Micro
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version: <25.10.06 debian.org>
Date: <25.10.06 13.00>
Machine:
Processor:
Memory:< 512 MB>
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host
Bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge:
We are living in a time of resource, and those with the
mineral wealth are those with the power and money.
oil, belongings, gold; all at record highs. It's where you need to be.
Our next feature has achieve that position, and is now
starting heavy mass advertising to let everyone know it.
This c0
45 matches
Mail list logo
