On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:27:00AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Package: partman-auto-crypto
Version: 2
(1)
In autopartition-crypto there is a somewhat dangerous double use of
"$dev"; it would possibly be better to use separate variables. be better
to use separate variables.
Ok
I also wonder wha
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 07:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > > Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> > > possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
> >
> > R
Hi,
I am playing around with the installer and I believe I have hit this
problem.
If I select automatically set up LVM and crypto I get a good setup, but
if I then go to Configure encrypted partitions I am told I can't as swap
is not encrypted.
The swap is an LVM partition on a dm-crypt device,
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with th
Your message dated Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:33:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391879: INTL:de typo in german translation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
debian installer lets one setup a raid fairly easily. however, it gives
no indication that one can't partition an array, but one has to
partition the base disks and create the arrays out of the partitions.
In fact, the installer will go ahead an pa
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 09 October 2006 16:31, Dr. Harold K. Brown, P.E. wrote:
I believe it would be beneficial for Etch users to have a Raid 6
installation option that really works at time of installation. I can
help with testing and even do some patches. My time is limited
(This is the last message I will CC you; if you're not yet subscribed to
the list, please do.)
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:45, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> RParr escreveu:
> > I, for one, would very much welcome this. I am not a kernel beater
> > but I would be willing to do what I can to help te
On Monday 09 October 2006 23:07, Alexander Vogel wrote:
> What is meant by "in some other way"?
> Is there something like dpkg -i snmp.deb (just as an bad example), i
> can use ? What's recommended?
The preferred method to install individual packages from a script (e.g.
preseed late) is to use ap
On Monday 09 October 2006 16:31, Dr. Harold K. Brown, P.E. wrote:
> I believe it would be beneficial for Etch users to have a Raid 6
> installation option that really works at time of installation. I can
> help with testing and even do some patches. My time is limited, and I
> do know time is sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
RParr escreveu:
>
> I, for one, would very much welcome this. I am not a kernel beater but
> I would be willing to do what I can to help test/whatever to see this
> happen.
Then smile ->
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/li
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:11, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe
> it's better to remove them from unstable.
That is not really an option. The 2.6.18 kernel is scheduled for release
with Etch.
What needs to happen is that the bug i
Dr. Harold K. Brown, P.E. wrote:
Currently, I am using the ARC-1220 Areca raid controller with the RAID
6 engine under Debian. The system is i386 based and the only hard
drives on the system is the Raid 6 drive set. This is a hardware raid
solution.
I believe it would be beneficial for Etch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto:
The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that
the kernel
pa
Hello,
I need some information:
In the file http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/example-preseed.txt
i found this :
# You can choose to install any combination of tasks that are available.
# Available tasks as of this writing include: Desktop environment,
# Web server, Print server, DNS server,
Last week, after reading [1], I wanted to see how hard it'd be
to port the graphical installer on arm.
I set up a sid VM and checked out a copy of the d-i build
environment as described in [2]
I then created a patch ([3]) based on the existing g-i build
environments and tried to compile which took
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#391395: installation report
Date: Monday 09 October 2006 18:34
From: Alexis Lee1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Frans,
`lspci -n`: 00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24cb (rev 01)
`dmesg`:
... cut ...
hda: IC35L040AVVN07-0, ATA
Quoting Mario Iseli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
>
> Hi,
>
> today I installed Debian Etch on a friends workstation, in german. First
> of all congratulations, you really do a good job and I like the new
> installer. I just wanted to report a lit
I just tried to do an installation on a Cobalt MIPS machine after
being away from the machine for several months and I get an error
during partitioning. When it wants to format /boot, which is to get
an ext2 r0 (old ext2) partition, it fails with:
The ext2 (revision 0) file system creation in p
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge2_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge2.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge2.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge2_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge2_sparc.udeb
Accepted:
glantank-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
glantank-utils_0.3_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-utils_0.3_arm.deb
glantank_0.3.dsc
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.3.dsc
glantank_0.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.3
glantank_0.3_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glantank_0.3.dsc
glantank_0.3.tar.gz
glantank-utils_0.3_arm.deb
glantank-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Currently, I am using the ARC-1220 Areca raid controller with the RAID 6 engine under Debian. The system is i386 based and the only hard drives on the system is the Raid 6 drive set. This is a hardware raid solution. I believe it would be beneficial for Etch users to have a Raid 6 installation o
Accepted:
glantank-installer_0.2_arm.udeb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-installer_0.2_arm.udeb
glantank-utils_0.2_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-utils_0.2_arm.deb
glantank_0.2.dsc
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.2.dsc
glantank_0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.2
Quoting martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I cannot imagine how partman would hang due to the resync of RAIDs.
> Can you please try to reproduce this problem?
Hm, not sure: I vaguely remember, that the hardware in
question was a then current Dell server with two hard-disks.
If nobody faced the
Accepted:
glantank-installer_0.1_arm.udeb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-installer_0.1_arm.udeb
glantank-utils_0.1_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank-utils_0.1_arm.deb
glantank_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.1.dsc
glantank_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/glantank/glantank_0.1
After thinking a bit more, I realized adding a bit more information
serves better for logging. Here is an updated patch which adds more
logging message in the fail function.
Osamu
--- cdrom-detect.postinst.orig 2006-10-09 19:31:46.0 +0900
+++ cdrom-detect.postinst 2006-10-09 22:21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 251898 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251898: long delay because RAID has to sync
Changed Bug submitter from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Your message dated Mon, 9 Oct 2006 22:03:43 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I am happy with beta 3 release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
submitter 251898 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Wolfgang,
I cannot imagine how partman would hang due to the resync of RAIDs.
Can you please try to reproduce this problem?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http:/
Package: cdrom-detect
Version: 1.17
Followup-For: Bug #267168
This bug and its friends which are still there as nomal bugs are now
almost finished for me in etch beta 3 release.
I am taliking:
#247960, #258316, #259264, #262140, #265636, #267168, #314163
Also, the following bug may be merged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
I've recently experienced a machine hang [1] after a kernel upgrade
by dist-upgrade.
Is there a way to make debian not to install as default image in lilo/
silo the new kernel image when you make a dist-upgrade?
It would be nice if de
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Hi,
today I installed Debian Etch on a friends workstation, in german. First
of all congratulations, you really do a good job and I like the new
installer. I just wanted to report a little typo in it, on the list
where you can select the task o
33 matches
Mail list logo
