Processing of localechooser_1.24_i386.changes

localechooser_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: localechooser_1.24.dsc localechooser_1.24.tar.gz localechooser_1.24_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#317165: marked as done (localechooser: behaves badly if user selected different default locale)

Your message dated Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:38:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing irrelevant BR has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Processed: severity of 365307 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > severity 365307 wishlist Bug#365307: localechooser: Should build the list of languages, depending on the interface, at run time rather than build time Severity set to `wishlist' from

localechooser_1.24_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: localechooser_1.24.dsc to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.24.dsc localechooser_1.24.tar.gz to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.24.tar.gz localechooser_1.24_all.udeb to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.24_all.udeb Override entries for your package: loca

How to "recognize" that the install is a floppy install?

In #269972, I developed a patch which could be used by localechooser to warn users that the install runs in English temporarily even if they choose another language. This patch is meant to be used on floppy installs where all translations are removed from the initial udebs for space reasons. The

Re: new netcfg translations from Ubuntu

On 30/08/2006, at 8:04 PM, Christian Perrier wrote: (please leave the discussion CC'ed. I want D-I developers who do not necessarily read -i18n to give their adviceeven if the D-I release manager, Frans Pop, is actually on holidays) Approximately how many strings, and in which files would

Processed: tagging 384323

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 384323 pending Bug#384323: localechooser: Should not overwrite console-cyrillic configuration There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing h

Latest sarge sparc32 netboot image problems

Hi, JFYI, the current sarge sparc32 netboot 2.4 image downloaded from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img fails to load the network modules due to missing crc32_* symbols. The module providing these symbols appears to be missing

Processing of grub-installer_1.18_i386.changes

grub-installer_1.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_1.18.dsc grub-installer_1.18.tar.gz grub-installer_1.18_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Processing of partman-auto-lvm_14_i386.changes

partman-auto-lvm_14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto-lvm_14.dsc partman-auto-lvm_14.tar.gz partman-auto-lvm_14_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Processing of partman-auto_55_i386.changes

partman-auto_55_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_55.dsc partman-auto_55.tar.gz partman-auto_55_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processing of partman-lvm_46_i386.changes

partman-lvm_46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-lvm_46.dsc partman-lvm_46.tar.gz partman-lvm_46_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Bug#385180: marked as done (GRUB 2 support)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385180: fixed in grub-installer 1.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#380351: marked as done (hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rendering them "unmovable")

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380351: fixed in grub-installer 1.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processing of choose-mirror_2.05_i386.changes

choose-mirror_2.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_2.05.dsc choose-mirror_2.05.tar.gz choose-mirror_2.05_all.udeb choose-mirror-bin_2.05_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#375491: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm: should automatically delete existing LVM)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381693: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#385531: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: etch beta 3, 2006/08/30, FH Esslingen Date: 2006/08/30 Machine: MEDION Processor: PIV 630, 3.2GHz Memory: 1G Partitions: FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb3 reiserfs 3992000 2290988

Bug#255024: marked as done (partman-auto: should not suggest guided part'ing for RAID/LVM volumes)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375257: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#383104: marked as done (debian-installer: Installer talks about the third console, but it is the fourth one.)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383104: fixed in partman-lvm 46 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#375491: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm: should automatically delete existing LVM)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382315: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#381693: marked as done (Should automatically delete pre-existing LVM from selected disk)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375491: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

grub-installer_1.18_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: grub-installer_1.18.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.18.dsc grub-installer_1.18.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.18.tar.gz grub-installer_1.18_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.18_i386.udeb Override entries for your pa

Bug#375491: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm: should automatically delete existing LVM)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375491: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#385316: marked as done (choose-mirror: please update before releasing next release candidate)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385316: fixed in choose-mirror 2.05 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350450: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm: Assumes a /boot partition in selected scheme is not marked lvmok)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350450: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#255024: marked as done (partman-auto: should not suggest guided part'ing for RAID/LVM volumes)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255024: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#381693: marked as done (Should automatically delete pre-existing LVM from selected disk)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381693: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#375161: marked as done (partman-lvm: check LV and VG names before trying to create them)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375161: fixed in partman-lvm 46 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#381693: marked as done (Should automatically delete pre-existing LVM from selected disk)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382315: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#382315: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm wont overwrite a lvm volume group on disk. breaking preseeded installations)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382315: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#382315: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm wont overwrite a lvm volume group on disk. breaking preseeded installations)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375491: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#384527: marked as done (partman-auto: implement two-level menu split)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384527: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#375257: marked as done (partman-auto: Should not offer LVM devices for partitioning)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255024: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#375257: marked as done (partman-auto: Should not offer LVM devices for partitioning)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375257: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#382315: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm wont overwrite a lvm volume group on disk. breaking preseeded installations)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:51:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381693: fixed in partman-auto 55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

partman-auto_55_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-auto_55.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_55.dsc partman-auto_55.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_55.tar.gz partman-auto_55_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_55_i386.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-auto_55.dsc - s

choose-mirror_2.05_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: choose-mirror-bin_2.05_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.05_i386.udeb choose-mirror_2.05.dsc to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.05.dsc choose-mirror_2.05.tar.gz to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.05.tar.gz choose-mirror_2.05_all.udeb t

partman-auto-lvm_14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-auto-lvm_14.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_14.dsc partman-auto-lvm_14.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_14.tar.gz partman-auto-lvm_14_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_14_all.udeb Override entries for you

partman-lvm_46_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-lvm_46.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_46.dsc partman-lvm_46.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_46.tar.gz partman-lvm_46_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_46_all.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-lvm_46.dsc - source debian

Processed: tagging 384527

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 384527 + pending Bug#384527: partman-auto: implement two-level menu split Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#307306: marked as done (debian-installer: Uses 2.6.10 kernel on amd64.)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:01:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of debian-installer 20050317sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#306976: marked as done (debian-installer: monolithic should use libdevmapper1.01-udeb.)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:01:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of debian-installer 20050317sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#375740: marked as done (partman-auto: add support for partman-auto-crypto preseeding)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:14:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line No longer relevant has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#385179: debian-installer: [installation report : powerpc] IBM pseries p505 single CPU, no virtualization

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:09:57PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:49:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:15:49PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > > How knows the kernel which one to use? > > > > the kernel will output to all of those existi

Re: r40333 - in trunk/packages/arch/i386/grub-installer: . debian

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otavio Salvador wrote: >> +Template: grub-installer/grub2_instead_of_grub_legacy >> +Type: boolean >> +Default: false >> +# This is suitable for testing grub2 only. Do not translate it! >> +Description: Install GRUB 2 instead of GRUB Legacy? > >> + db_input

Triage bugs

Hello, To keep this E-mail short, I'll skip my personal motivation for working on the debian-installer. The import thing is that we, this mailinglist, have as common interest "d-i". I have still interest in the project, but I gonna chance my focus. That means that I not will be processing install

Bug#376635: tasksel: tasks icon infrastructure.

Gustavo Franco wrote: > Could you give me a hint about the best image format to the 'icon' > feature? I haven't thought about it.. > Btw, could we use country/region flags to the l10n tasks? I don't see the point, since those tasks are not user-visible. -- see shy jo signature.asc Descripti

Bug#385233: marked as done (Debian Netinstall 3.1r2 cannot detect cdrom on Intel D945GNT motherboard)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:30:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385233: Debian Netinstall 3.1r2 cannot detect cdrom on Intel D945GNT motherboard has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Re: r40333 - in trunk/packages/arch/i386/grub-installer: . debian

Otavio Salvador wrote: > +Template: grub-installer/grub2_instead_of_grub_legacy > +Type: boolean > +Default: false > +# This is suitable for testing grub2 only. Do not translate it! > +Description: Install GRUB 2 instead of GRUB Legacy? > + db_input low grub-installer/grub2_instead_of_grub_legacy

Re: pressed , display only netcfg-info box to user

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:20:48PM +0300, george wrote: > > is it possible to force the installer to display > the dialog box that contains the fields that > accept the information that is mentioned above > as pressed file directives, and if possible do > this regardless of the debconf priority le

Bug#385179: debian-installer: [installation report : powerpc] IBM pseries p505 single CPU, no virtualization

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:49:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:15:49PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > How knows the kernel which one to use? > > the kernel will output to all of those existing, while the interactive one > being the last one. Since i have not yet see

Re: Urgent : megaraid and qla2300 modules not found

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:09:34AM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote: > Hello Dan, Frans > > Today I can install the debian on our ia64 machine :-) and all work fine. > The megaraid is correctly recognized and no errors with initramfs. > the cd net install image is the 20060827 > > I don't know if my pr

Bug#385445: installation-guide: Typo on appendex/preseed.xml, missing closing parenthesis

Quoting Tapio Lehtonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: installation-guide > Version: Id: preseed.xml 39932 2006-08-17 22:42:15Z joeyh > Severity: minor > > > *** preseed.xml 2006-08-18 11:49:44.0 +0300 > --- preseed-tale.xml 2006-08-31 13:08:52.964723842 +0300 Can you comit that

Processing of iso-scan_1.16_powerpc.changes

iso-scan_1.16_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: iso-scan_1.16.dsc iso-scan_1.16.tar.gz iso-scan_1.16_all.udeb load-iso_1.16_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

cdrom-detect_1.17_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-detect_1.17.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.17.dsc cdrom-detect_1.17.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.17.tar.gz cdrom-detect_1.17_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.17_all.udeb Override entries for your package: cdrom-detect_

iso-scan_1.16_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: iso-scan_1.16.dsc to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.16.dsc iso-scan_1.16.tar.gz to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.16.tar.gz iso-scan_1.16_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.16_all.udeb load-iso_1.16_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.16_all.udeb Override ent

Processing of cdrom-detect_1.17_powerpc.changes

cdrom-detect_1.17_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-detect_1.17.dsc cdrom-detect_1.17.tar.gz cdrom-detect_1.17_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#385151: marked as done (linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6: upgrade to 2.6.17 kernels.)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:49:51 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385151: fixed in linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

Hi i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it turns out that - a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hope the DirectFB maintainer has the time to prepare a snapshot for experi

linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.20_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: affs-modules-2.6.17-2-powerpc-di_1.20_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.17-2-powerpc-di_1.20_powerpc.udeb affs-modules-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot-di_1.20_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot

Bug#376635: tasksel: tasks icon infrastructure.

"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Any other symbol will be very likely to be related to a culture and >> thus geographical considerations than related to a language. > > makes sense, IMHO. > > Btw, any hint on the size and format? Joey ? If we can make it with svg might be a lot bet

Bug#142881: Have your seen this?

Sorry for taking so long to reply. We are sorry to inform you that our product is still not in stores. Currently we are only offering it on our product website and plan on having it in stores come October 2006. Our company Nutritionist still recommends a 4 month supply for best results. If you h

Re: Supporting multiple udeb sources.... is it really this easy?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:30:18AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:21:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Another idea that has crossed my mind the other day, would be

Re: Supporting multiple udeb sources.... is it really this easy?

Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:21:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Another idea that has crossed my mind the other day, would be to create >> > separate initramfs images, one holding the main installer, the

Bug#376635: tasksel: tasks icon infrastructure.

On 8/31/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting point, thanks for you help. Do you have any suggestion for > l10n tasks icons? (not sure that I should keep you CC'ed. Doing so, in doubt) Please do. Not exactly, no. The most suited would be an "icon" with the lowercase

Re: Supporting multiple udeb sources.... is it really this easy?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:21:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Another idea that has crossed my mind the other day, would be to create > > separate initramfs images, one holding the main installer, the other holding > > the kernel modules (would al

Re: Supporting multiple udeb sources.... is it really this easy?

Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another idea that has crossed my mind the other day, would be to create > separate initramfs images, one holding the main installer, the other holding > the kernel modules (would allow to keep a single copy of the installer, and > various copies of the per

Bug#385446: PTS: handling of udebs could be improved

Package: qa.debian.org Looking at packages.qa.debian.org/partman-crypto, there are two points specific to udebs that could be improved. They would make the page more useful (and correct) for udeb-only packages: 1. TODO and Problems warn about outdated Standards-Version. The current practice for u

Bug#385445: installation-guide: Typo on appendex/preseed.xml, missing closing parenthesis

Package: installation-guide Version: Id: preseed.xml 39932 2006-08-17 22:42:15Z joeyh Severity: minor *** preseed.xml 2006-08-18 11:49:44.0 +0300 --- preseed-tale.xml2006-08-31 13:08:52.964723842 +0300 *** *** 458,464 Most questions need to be preseeded using t

pressed , display only netcfg-info box to user

# Static network configuration. #d-i netcfg/get_nameservers string 192.168.1.1 #d-i netcfg/get_ipaddress string 192.168.1.42 #d-i netcfg/get_netmask string 255.255.255.0 #d-i netcfg/get_gateway string 192.168.1.1 #d-i netcfg/confirm_static boolean true #unknown netcfg/confirm_static boolean true

Bug#381979: Patch for this bug, RFC

yesterday i produced a dirty patch [1] for the GTK frontend to make the underlying DFB system force-reload the keymap at every frontend_go() call and Davide made tests and confirmet it works. This patch direcltly calls a DFB function from the GTK code: this is unclean and will be polished as soo

ia64 error at boot

Hello, On my syslog I report theses error : Aug 31 07:15:31 nova kernel: GSI 48 (level, low) -> CPU 1 (0xc218) vector 56 Aug 31 07:15:31 nova kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:01.0[A] -> GSI 48 (level, low) -> IRQ 56 Aug 31 07:15:31 nova kernel: megaraid: fw version:[1.77] bios version:[3.14] A

Re: Urgent : megaraid and qla2300 modules not found

Hello Dan, Frans Today I can install the debian on our ia64 machine :-) and all work fine. The megaraid is correctly recognized and no errors with initramfs. the cd net install image is the 20060827 I don't know if my previous problem (random boot on megaraid or qla controller) are solved becaus

libd-i ABI bump

Hi folks There is an ABI bump scheduled for after beta3. It includes the following changes: libdebian-install.so.4 -> libdebian-installer.so.5 and a new libdebian-installer-package.so.0 The later is needed to make changes on the packages structures more easily. There was requests to do so on a r

Re: Supporting multiple udeb sources.... is it really this easy?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:20:53PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > OK, looking through 'anna' (finally found it *$ing package which only > produces udebs), > it looks like it should *not* need to be modified. > > 'anna' can be invoked multiple times with different retrievers, which is all > tha

Fixed in NMU of debian-installer 20050317sarge1

tag 306976 + fixed tag 307306 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:19:56 +0200 Source: debian-installer Binary: debian-install