Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:01:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372734: fixed in base-config 2.53.10.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 306976 + fixed
Bug#306976: debian-installer: monolithic should use libdevmapper1.01-udeb.
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> tag 307306 + fixed
Bug#307306: debian-installer: Uses 2.6.10 kernel on amd64.
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356939: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.3-31sarge9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Installing:
file-preseed_1.01.2_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_1.01.2_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.01.2_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/network-preseed_1.01.2_all.udeb
preseed_1.01.2.dsc
to pool/main/p/preseed/preseed_1.01.2.dsc
preseed_1.01.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/preseed/pres
Installing:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.2
Installing:
acpi-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i3
Installing:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-386-di_1.04sarge2_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-386-di_1.04sarge2_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.04sarge2_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.04sarge2_i386.u
Installing:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-gen
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_1.0sarge1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_1.0sarge1_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_1.0sarge1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_1.0sarg
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc32-di_0.05sarge2_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc32-di_0.05sarge2_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge2_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules
Installing:
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-tape-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-tape-di_0.61sarge1_s390
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc64-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.
Installing:
debian-installer-manual_20050317sarge1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20050317sarge1_i386.deb
debian-installer_20050317sarge1.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20050317sarge1.dsc
debian-installer_20050317sarge1.tar.gz
to pool/
Installing:
base-config_2.53.10.2.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.10.2.dsc
base-config_2.53.10.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.10.2.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.10.2_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.10.2_all.deb
Override entries for your p
Installing:
base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.dsc
base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.tar.gz
base-installer_1.13.4sarge1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.1
Installing:
affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power3-di_0.78sarge2_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power3-di_0.78sarge2_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power4-di_0.78sarge2_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power4-d
Installing:
affs-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.64sarge1_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc/affs-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.64sarge1_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-small-di_0.64sarge1_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc/affs-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-sma
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel/cdrom-core-modul
Installing:
fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb
fat-modu
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/fat-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge2_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge2_hppa.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-64-di_1.1sarge2_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-64-di_1.1sarge
Installing:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge2_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge2_ia64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge2_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.8-3
Installing:
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
fat-mo
> Interesting point, thanks for you help. Do you have any suggestion for
> l10n tasks icons?
(not sure that I should keep you CC'ed. Doing so, in doubt)
Not exactly, no. The most suited would be an "icon" with the lowercase
ISO-639 2-letter code ("en", "fr", "pt"and the exceptions "pt_BR",
"
Thank you for repling
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:10:21 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:28:33PM +0900, Yukiharu Yabuki wrote:
> > I take screen shot
> >
> > If you can see, these images, It is easy to get issue.
> > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/diary/2
OK, looking through 'anna' (finally found it *$ing package which only produces
udebs),
it looks like it should *not* need to be modified.
'anna' can be invoked multiple times with different retrievers, which is all
that
is needed for this.
(There may be some issue with Packages files. I'm not
Thanks. :) I used the Testing (etch) nightly snapshot and it worked OK.
However, there is a minor annoyance that should be addressed before the next
Stable release. When selecting Reiserfs for root partition, /etc/fstab gets
created with the "notail" mount option even when it is not selected dur
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Network Install CD
Image version: 30 August 2006
Date:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 380Z
Processor: Pentium II 300 mhz
Memory: 163 mb
Partitions:
[EM
On 31/08/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aug 31 00:24:00 pppd[11082]: pppd 2.4.4 started by (unknown), uid 0
> Aug 31 00:24:00 apt-install: Queueing package ppp for later installation
> Aug 31 00:24:00 main-menu[2142]: (process:10955): 0
> Aug 31 00:24:00 main-menu[2142]: WAR
On 31/08/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Sorry for the lag of my answer, I was on "pseudo-[VAC]".
NP, this debugging is not such a pleasure :-D
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:24:31PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> Could you please set DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 at boot time an
Accepted:
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.dsc
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.tar.gz
Override entries
ttf-cjk-compact_1.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.5.tar.gz
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
Sorry for the lag of my answer, I was on "pseudo-[VAC]".
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:24:31PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> Could you please set DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 at boot time and run the PPPoE
> step (after doing the move of the plugin) and send the relevant log
> section?
>
> Relevant means
Following conversations on IRC with joeyh and Kamion, I've redone the
patch so that the menu layout changes can be kept to a bare minimum.
The updated patch is attached, to see the menu in action:
http://www.hardeman.nu/~david/files/patches/debian/menuone-v2.png
http://www.hardeman.nu/~david/fil
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:29:29PM -0700, Dave Bechtel wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: April 2006,
> Debian FTP site - Debian Netinstall 3.1 R2
Please use newer debian-installer such as version "Beta 3"
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r2/i
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:44:10PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Denis suggested dropping /etc/environment and moving locale
> information to /etc/default/locale.
>
> I support this idea, but currently this change prevents
> the localized desktop environment.
>
> GDM is launched in local l
Package: efi-reader
Version: 0.7
Severity: serious
efi-reader doesn't build with current toolchain:
(osprey)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/efi-reader-0.7$ gcc-4.1 -W -Wall -I.
-fomit-frame-pointer -Os efi-reader.c -o efi-reader -ldebian-installer
-ldebconfclient
efi-reader.c:27: error: expected spec
On 8/30/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Joey,
>
> Could you give me a hint about the best image format to the 'icon'
> feature? Btw, could we use country/region flags to the l10n tasks?
I would strongly discourage you to do so as
Quoting Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Joey,
>
> Could you give me a hint about the best image format to the 'icon'
> feature? Btw, could we use country/region flags to the l10n tasks?
I would strongly discourage you to do so as this is very likely to
drive sensitive problems (using Fr
Hi Joey,
Could you give me a hint about the best image format to the 'icon'
feature? Btw, could we use country/region flags to the l10n tasks?
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 350450 + pending
Bug#350450: partman-auto-lvm: Assumes a /boot partition in selected scheme is
not marked lvmok
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, st
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> Denis suggested dropping /etc/environment and moving locale
> information to /etc/default/locale.
>
> I support this idea, but currently this change prevents
> the localized desktop environment.
>
> GDM is launched in local language using /etc/d
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:57:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385311: install: default apt.conf in etch beta 3 makes
impossible the apt to connect through transparent zorp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 385316 pending
Bug#385316: choose-mirror: please update before releasing next release candidate
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 385316 pending
thanks
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: choose-mirror
> Severity: wishlist
> Version: 2.04
>
> Hi,
>
> We Japanese people changed Mirrors.masterlist to order of JP mirrors
> we expected (ftp.jp should be
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:28:19PM +0200, GavLac wrote:
> Package: install
> Severity: normal
>
> Acquire::http::Proxy "false";
> with transparent zorp proxy gives the following:
> Hib http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
> 500 Error encountered [IP: 194.109.137.218 80]
>
> wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 255024 + pending
Bug#255024: partman-auto: should not suggest guided part'ing for RAID/LVM
volumes
There were no tags set.
Bug#375257: partman-auto: Should not offer LVM devices
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:06, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:15, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is
> > > > what the firmware on a
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:02:08PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting W. Borgert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it (or will it be) possible to check the RAM for errors
> > before actually doing an installation with d-i? Either as
> > optional step in the d-i menu or as additional b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 368633 - patch
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:39:58AM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
And here's an updated patch. This one is tested and works with one
exception: if you do an automated partman-auto-lvm install two times in
a row, the parted server seems to become confused and the manual
partitioning screen is mess
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:09:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384662: installation-reports: t2000 niagara sucess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 375491 + pending
Bug#375491: partman-auto-lvm: should automatically delete existing LVM
Tags were: patch
Bug#381693: Should automatically delete pre-existing LVM from selected di
David Goodenough wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:15, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is what
> > > the firmware on a real decstation would boot. However gxemul does not
> > > have any fir
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, it's not exactly an experimental package. It's releases and
>> usable for a lot of people. I just don't think it's suitable to Etch
>> since it's receiving too many modification and redesigns from upstream
>> side.
>>
>> I'll make it not tran
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:15, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is what
> > the firmware on a real decstation would boot. However gxemul does not
> > have any firmware, it only knows how to load an EL
The future versions of Debian will support the nVidia controller SATA
during the installation?
That is will be able to be installed a computer without the disc aid
SCSI or IDE?
Thanks in advance for your answer and availability.
Andrea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package grub-installer
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grub-installer
> tags 380351 + pending
Bug#380351: hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rendering them
"unmovable"
Hi,
Denis suggested dropping /etc/environment and moving locale
information to /etc/default/locale.
I support this idea, but currently this change prevents
the localized desktop environment.
GDM is launched in local language using /etc/default/locale
(called by /etc/init.d/gdm).
But when user lo
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:07:38AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> However gxemul does not have
> any firmware, it only knows how to load an ELF file and get it started.
> Well supposedly it should also be able to load a binary file such as the
> initrd image, but for some reason I've been una
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: choose-mirror
Severity: wishlist
Version: 2.04
Hi,
We Japanese people changed Mirrors.masterlist to order of JP mirrors
we expected (ftp.jp should be prior to ftp2.jp).
Please update choose-mirror package with newest Mirrors.masterlist
befor
> Well, it's not exactly an experimental package. It's releases and
> usable for a lot of people. I just don't think it's suitable to Etch
> since it's receiving too many modification and redesigns from upstream
> side.
>
> I'll make it not translatable, no problem.
>
> But I have no problem to d
Quoting Michael Noisternig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: network
> Image version: 10 Aug 2006, debian.org
> Date: 10 Aug 2006
Please give the exact URL which you downloaded the images
from. Without this information, there is no chance that we can give
you a
Quoting W. Borgert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> is it (or will it be) possible to check the RAM for errors
> before actually doing an installation with d-i? Either as
> optional step in the d-i menu or as additional boot target
> for the syslinux boot prompt? Thanks for comments.
>
That would
Package: install
Severity: normal
Acquire::http::Proxy "false";
with transparent zorp proxy gives the following:
Hib http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
500 Error encountered [IP: 194.109.137.218 80]
without it aptitude update works
-- System Information:
Debian Release: test
(please leave the discussion CC'ed. I want D-I developers who do not
necessarily read -i18n to give their adviceeven if the D-I release
manager, Frans Pop, is actually on holidays)
> Approximately how many strings, and in which files would they be merged?
"a small amount". Colin takes care to
Hi,
is it (or will it be) possible to check the RAM for errors
before actually doing an installation with d-i? Either as
optional step in the d-i menu or as additional boot target
for the syslinux boot prompt? Thanks for comments.
Cheers, WB
(please CC me)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Asking at low priority would also be ok, if enough people would actually
>> > use it to justify all the traslator work and added space of such a
>> > user-visible question.
>>
>> Well, in that case I'll then apply the patch and manage to have it
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:07:38AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > > In other words, it was all my fault. Now I'm trying to figure out how to
> > > convince gxemul to start a debian kernel with the deb
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
[snip]
> What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is what
> the firmware on a real decstation would boot. However gxemul does not have
> any firmware, it only knows how to load an ELF file and get it started.
> Well supposedly it should also be able
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > In other words, it was all my fault. Now I'm trying to figure out how to
> > convince gxemul to start a debian kernel with the debian initrd...
>
> I wonder why this is a problem, the DECstation installer
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:10:06AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > Also just as a sanity check I did confirm today that the installation on
> > decstation works fine if I use the sarge 31r2 image instead. So gxemul
> > does seem to be useable enough if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 373253 important
Bug#373253: [g-i] crash if switch to VT2 on AMD64
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
This thread [1] started on directfb-dev by Davide Viti contains some
hints about how to set the correct keymap on dfb.
Attilio
[1] http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2006-August/002216.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Package: linux-kernel-di-m68k
Severity: serious
The linux-kernel-di-m68k package builds udebs for the 2.4.27 and 2.2.25
kernels, neither of which will be shipping with etch. It's time to drop
these kernels from testing.
Please clone this bug to ftp.debian.org to request removal of this package
f
Package: linux-kernel-di-i386
Severity: serious
The linux-kernel-di-i386 package builds udebs for the 2.4.27 kernel,
which will not be shipping with etch. It's time to drop the kernel and its
reverse-dependencies from testing.
Please clone this bug to ftp.debian.org to request removal of this pa
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: network
Image version: 10 Aug 2006, debian.org
Date: 10 Aug 2006
Machine: i386
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initia
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:10:06AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Also just as a sanity check I did confirm today that the installation on
> decstation works fine if I use the sarge 31r2 image instead. So gxemul
> does seem to be useable enough if you have the right image.
I figured
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:23:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Figured out the issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
David Härdeman wrote:
I've attached a patch which details what this could look like...
And here's an updated patch. This one is tested and works with one
exception: if you do an automated partman-auto-lvm install two times in
a row, the parted server seems to become confused and the manual
p
81 matches
Mail list logo
