Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Could be done, as well, but I'd prefer the gconf route, since that
> doesn't require patching .desktop files. Something that comes to my mind
> is providing a debconf key in the gksu packge that would never be asked,
> or would be 'low', and that would be used to deci
On 8/23/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:39:31AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So. What one must do ? I know XFS warrants _file system_ integrity
> (not data), but
> this is some kind of nasty thing 4K=5G.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:58:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> - grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
> >> kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need to migrate to etch
> >> together w
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:39:31AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So. What one must do ? I know XFS warrants _file system_ integrity
> (not data), but
> this is some kind of nasty thing 4K=5G.
Hmm, no, this is some kind of POSIX thing. Most files
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> - grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
>> kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need to migrate to etch
>> together with linux-2.6 2.6.17-6 OR new installations will be
>> broken.
> Could yo
On 8/23/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> On 8/22/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:57:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> ...
> > > in prev. email, result is nothing from xfs
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> On 8/22/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:57:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> ...
> > > in prev. email, result is nothing from xfs_check and xfs_repair.
> >
> > repair and check wont
Em Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:06:48 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Though, maybe that is easier said than done. Thanks.
>
> We really can't make that kind of change at install time in d-i.
Can we provide a default gconf setting at install time, though? The
'gksu' application decides
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:10:08PM -0400, Abel McClendon wrote:
> check bug #384121
Indeed, it's exactly same problem.
> > and issue the command
> > "mv /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4b1 /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4"
With this workaround, I retry my tests with PPPoE connection.
Then my PPPoE connection is up corre
check bug #384121
:/quoted:/
From: "Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#384121: ppp-udeb: fails to
find rp-pppoe.so Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:59:57 +0300
On 22/08/06, Abel McClendo
(Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed)
Hi,
Today I test d-i and configuring PPPoE connection with last
daily-build[*]. When I configure PPPoE, it detecs my
concentrator, ask me login/password but after fails with this
message (sorry, little part of it is in french):
[!!] Configure and start a PPPoE
reopen 373704
thanks
Version: 1:1.1.3-2
Hi,
It doesn't seem to be fixed:
$ sort -k5 -t/ -n
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/99reboot
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/50brltty
^D
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/99reboot
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/50brltty
While it would be expected to see 50brltty coming before 99reb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 373704
Bug#373704: sort -k does not count fields the same as gnu sort
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping pr
Hi,
Could someone please add the following to the errata list?
BrlTTY doesn't automatically get installed
Even if BrlTTY gets started if needed during installation (thanks to
autodetection or manual setting), it isn't automatically installed
on the target system. That's because of orderin
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> It would be nice if #381951 could be considered for inclusion.
Note that this will increase the size of the resultant image by ~8k,
is that within bounds for d-i? Can we get away with just enabling this
on the 686[-pae] subarchs (and do
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:54:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350275: [i18n] Hex codes instead of letters in d-i prompts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
I've attached the first stab at reorganising the partman-auto menu into
a two level menu.
The first patch shows the changes that I've done to partman-auto and the
second patch shows what changes would be necessary to partman-auto-lvm
(similar changes would be needed for partman-auto-crypto and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 384202 linux-2.6
Bug#384202: Failure on systems with HP iLO 2
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
kbd-chooser_1.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_1.30.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.30.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.30_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
rootskel_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.35.dsc
rootskel_1.35.tar.gz
rootskel_1.35_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.35_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
user debian-boot@lists.debian.org
usertag 384202 i386 etch-beta3 netinst hw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 13:27, you wrote:
> No changes with the netinstall dayly build today :-(
> missing megaraid.ko megaraid/megaraid_mm.ko and
> megaraid/megaraid_mbox.ko I continue to download from my website these
> 3 files.
Well, getting changes into daily builds takes some time...
> And
Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I don't think it is much use to add it after the fact. I
> also don't think it is a good idea to change the release notes from the
> mail that was sent out.
> The list of changes included in the release and that were candidates for
> inclusion in the release not
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:03:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> [ identifiable DHCP request didn't made it into the release notes ]
>
> Please remind me to list it for the next release.
Will do
GSt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377355: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:37:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384092: debian-installer: setting preseed/url in
network-preseed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382697: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365308: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339716: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.35_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.35_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.35.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.35.dsc
rootskel_1.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.35.tar.gz
rootskel_1.35_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.3
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_1.30.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.30.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.30.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.30_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
kbd-chooser_1.30.dsc
David Härdeman wrote:
> before I want on vacation I whipped up the attached patch which changes
> partman-crypto to do "on-demand" loading of components. The result is
> that it doesn't use memory if not used at the expense of additional
> downloads during partitioning if encryption is desired.
Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > +++ trunk/packages/installation-report/bug/installation-report/script
> > Thu Aug 17 22:47:20 2006
> > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
> > if [ ! -e "$logsavedir/hardware-summary" ]; then
> > gettext "Cannot find installation logs in /var/log/installer"
> > echo
>
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:02:49PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I will try to look at it over the next few days. Maybe David Härdeman will
> be willing to take a look as we
OTOH, the missing dep may only make it fail to find an existing windows
install, or find one that partman later removes, so as long as it is
still a the right point in the menu, this will only be a problem when
it's run out-of-order. There might be something to be said for allowing
the user the pos
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:28:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247260: can be closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 17:10, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Log:
> > Drop depend on mounted-partitions. It is not needed, as the editing of
> > /target/ is done in finish-install.d/, and it messes up the debian-edu
> > main-menu reordering.
>
> I think it is needed because
Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I don't know if this fix works with policy, but all you have to do is in
> every gui admin's .desktop file change:
>
> TryExec=gksu
> Exec=gksu -u root disks-admin
>
> or
>
> TryExec=gksu
> Exec=gksu disks-admin
>
> To:
>
> TryExec=gksudo
> Exec=gksudo disks-admin
>
> Th
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 13:58, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Please add the identifiable DHCP request to the release notes.
I'm sorry, but I don't think it is much use to add it after the fact. I
also don't think it is a good idea to change the release notes from the
mail that was sent out.
The list
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:58:37 +0200 Davide Viti wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:04:56AM +0200, Holger Hoffmann wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > The installer is (almost) perfect! Didn't use Debian 'til yesterday
> > because installing was a hassle.
> > Minor problem: I selected German as insta
I wanted to mention that this is not only a problem of Czech.
It also happens i.e. in de and thus likely in other languages,
too.
Holger
--
==
Created with Sylpheed 2.2.2
under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 »Sarge«
http://counte
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:02, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Did either of you manage this yet? I've tested it against an up to
> date daily and with more than just two partitions (i.e. adapting the
> multi recipe from partman-auto) and it's still working fine here.
No sorry. And I'm afraid I won't be
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 17:10, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Log:
> Drop depend on mounted-partitions. It is not needed, as the editing of
> /target/ is done in finish-install.d/, and it messes up the debian-edu
> main-menu reordering.
I think it is needed because clock-setup runs os-prober whic
Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > + [ Colin Watson ]
> > + * src-bootfloppy/sbin/init: Use list-devices to find storage devices.
> > +
> > -- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:20:43 +0200
> >
> > rootskel (1.34) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > Modified: trunk/package
Colin Watson wrote:
> + [ Colin Watson ]
> + * src-bootfloppy/sbin/init: Use list-devices to find storage devices.
> +
> -- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:20:43 +0200
>
> rootskel (1.34) unstable; urgency=low
>
> Modified: trunk/packages/rootskel/src-bootfloppy/sbin/init
Hi,
Your e-mail address came up when I tried to get info about a replacement
battery for an laptop made in Taiwan model A9001. I'm trying to find a
replacement battery for it.
Can you Help.
Thanks in advance,
Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > It is, by definition, a bit more invasive and it would be better if
> > someone with all the skills in keyboard/console stuff (such as
> > Alastair, Denis, Eugen) looks at it.
> >
> > I suggest committing the first patch (w
debian-installer-utils_1.35_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.35.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.35.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.35_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.35_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.35_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.35
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.35.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.35.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.35.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.35_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-ut
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.5_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.5_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.5_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.1
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:58:47PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> Ok, work now, I extract the deb from the netinstall cd and extract the
> megaraid.ko megaraid/megaraid_mm.ko megaraid/megaraid_mbox.ko
> Store these files on my web server and dowload under lib/modules//scsi
> Now I can continue th
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Boot method: CD and network
Image version: Etch Beta 3
Date: 22 August 2006
Machine: HP DL 360 G5
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon
Memory: 6 GB
Partitions: 1 partition
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = E
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 August 2006 12:17, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > > Is there anything magical I should do to upload partman-auto-raid?
> > Well, it should not be uploaded yet.
>
Hallo,
On 8/22/06, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:57:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
...
> in prev. email, result is nothing from xfs_check and xfs_repair.
repair and check wont be reporting a problem because the size is
valid... it looks like somethings has
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:14:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> The release notes of Beta 3 don't mention some like
> | d-i does send a identifiable DHCP request (vendor class is set to "d-i")
> | and from the DHCP answers uses d-i the filename as URL to the preseed
> | file. With 'preseed/run
Do nota ignore me please,
I found your email somewbhere and now decided tbo write you.
I am coming to your place in few weeks abnd thought we
can meet each other. Lbet me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Hello Frans,
No changes with the netinstall dayly build today :-(
missing megaraid.ko megaraid/megaraid_mm.ko and megaraid/megaraid_mbox.ko
I continue to download from my website these 3 files.
And the problem with initrd-tools continue to stop the install process.
Cheers
Guy
Frans Pop a écr
Hi,
I'm proud to confirm that i386 is also full installable.
Root disk is also sdi
Cheers
Bjoern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 383740
Bug#383740: quik-installer incorrectly allows separate root and /boot
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 383739 separate root and /boot doesnt work
Bug#383739: quik: Quik manpage incorrectly states that separate root and /boo
reopen 383740
retitle 383739 separate root and /boot doesnt work
thanks
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 09:39, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> That what it is *supposed* to do. It doesn't work, which is why I have
> filed the bug report on #383739 and this one. If it is supposed to
> work it needs to b
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 00:29, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Note that this currently means that VT2 may get garbled input as that
> > is not set to UTF-8, so the new challenge is how to set that
> > dynamically when the user switches to VT2. It needs to be set
> > dynamically as we don't know when init i
> It is, by definition, a bit more invasive and it would be better if
> someone with all the skills in keyboard/console stuff (such as
> Alastair, Denis, Eugen) looks at it.
>
> I suggest committing the first patch (we are in "near freeze" time)
> and report the other one as a separate BR (wit
> The bug you're referring to is #339352 which I closed a few days ago since
> I can't reproduce it anylonger. I just tried to rebuild a g-i image and,
> again,
> I wasn't able to reproduce it. My tests are done using qemu; also when I
> filed the
> bugreport I was using qemu and in the menwhile
> the attached patch, besides enabling "iso-8859-7", disables those and
> should make it easier to re-enable them if needed.
> Let me know if you prefere this second patch attached to a
> separate whishlist bug.
It is, by definition, a bit more invasive and it would be better if
someone with a
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: amd64 businesscard cd
Image version: etch beta3
Date: Tue Aug 22 11:27:48 CEST 2006
Machine: SUN X4100
Processor: 2 * AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248
Memory: 2GB
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdi1
* AWP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-22 00:52]:
> we really need to make it so one can go back and install grub or lilo on
> an existing installation (booting from the CD), without running thru the
> partitioning and base
> install.
I think the rescue mode can do this.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://w
we really need to make it so one can go back and install grub or lilo on
an existing installation (booting from the CD), without running thru the
partitioning and base
install.
--
AWP
ICQ:100373317
odigo: nagualshroom (2664065)
webpages:
http://glamdy.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382605: fixed in partman-crypto 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382374: fixed in partman-crypto 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381981: fixed in partman-crypto 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381870: fixed in partman-crypto 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382398: fixed in partman-crypto 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
partman-crypto_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_10.dsc
partman-crypto_10.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_10_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_10_all.udeb
partman-crypto_10_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:33:36 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #383740: quik-installer incorrectly allows separate root and /boot,
> which was filed against the
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_10_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_10_all.udeb
partman-crypto_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_10.dsc
partman-crypto_10.tar.gz
75 matches
Mail list logo
